scoutman1
Twitter - scoutman33
I was a scout in the QMJHL for 15 or more years...i have dealt with this issue and have seen impacts on the plus and negative side.....it is not cut and dry and most times the kids that decide to stay in U18 in their province end up being just as good as the ones that went USA route...sometimes the USA route is not always the best, going to a strong program a player that has good potential gets lost on a team that is taking the best kids from many stats or provinces and the kid does not develop like he should...at tournaments such as U17 or Canada Games, the kids that play USA route are no better than the kids who stayed and played U18...I’m not comparing the two - If I Was a parent in Quebec or the Maritimes - I’d be pushing my kid to go USHL/NCAA too - Quebec league is just so diluted now and has struggled to churn out talent the past 10 or so years consistently.
as for the school part of it...if a kid stays to play NCAA IF he gets a scholarship the family is still paying big money because not everyone gets a full one...USA schools are waaaay more expensive than Canadian.....in the QMJHL they have a program set up that if the kid plays 2 full years in the QMJHL then University is fully paid for....
to me unless my kid is Sidney Crosby, or Nathan Mackinnon and a big team like Shattuck comes calling with full paid for prep fees than IMO staying put is a great option and it almost seems like going USA route is a bragging right more for the parents than the kid. That said Shattuck route did not work out well for top 2024 NHL Prospect and 1st overall WHL pick Berkley Catton, he left USA route to come back to Canada last year to play U18 in Saskatchewan. I saw guys like Yasin Cisse be a guy who was being looked at as 1st overall in the QMJHL draft and went USA route and you never heard of him again.