montreal
Go Habs Go
Hockeytv.com.
I don't think they have the rights to the USHL anymore, I think Flo hockey has it now.
Hockeytv.com.
Benson has superior hockey IQ, but Newhook is bigger, faster and a better shooter. Benson is tougher to project at the NHL level as far as Im concerned since Ive my doubts the size/speed combo will translate well. Its not that I dont like him, I just find him a bit more risky and we already have Caufield on our top 6.That's kind of fair.
Benson SHOULD be a lot better, technically speaking, but Newhook has wheels and was also touted as 'high motor' when he was drafted.
Michkov sounds like a winner , good god that would be bad missing the opportunity!I don't see the same level of killer instinct in Carlsson as compared to Michkov. Michkov wants destruction and wants to score. I feel Carlsson is more passive than Michkov. Michkov from the center ice forward, probably is the scariest player of the draft not named Bedard.
He had a little bit of a mean steak that came out every once in a whileMichael Ryder ?
Michkov sounds like a winner , good god that would be bad missing the opportunity!
This is obviously with 5 included. 5 + 31 + 37 for 4. Thought it didn't need to be said.good luck finding a GM that would do that.
He might turn out to be a winger. It's up in the air like malkin in 2004 which is why Pittsburg made sure to emphasize that they were drafting "centre, Evgeni Malkin". I think he'll probably end up a C but it's not as definite as a dvorsky for exampleIf we get Carlson at 5, out center depth will be solved for a decade
I sincerely doubt it. Plus Carlsson represents greater safety (something drating teams tend to value in early picks) and plays a premium position.Men I hope SJ LOVE Michkov
Getting Carlsson at 5 would be magic
I would bet on that tooI sincerely doubt it. Plus Carlsson represents greater safety and plays a premium position.
I believe the top 4 will be the 4 centers.
That doesn't really matter, these guys I mentioned are all completely different players to Leonard, and to one another. I only bring them up because they're similar approximate body types and aren't really players that we think of as guys that get pushed around even though they're very different stylistically, they're just examples of how that size isn't really "small".Which of these players was drafted 5OA or above?
How many forwards play a power game and score at a good rate and are under 6’? How many prospects of this mold have been drafted and busted?
We can analyze this and dig around or just wait till tomorrow evening to see if it’s worth our time.
If it was that easy I'm sure Huges would have already done it.This is obviously with 5 included. 5 + 31 + 37 for 4. Thought it didn't need to be said.
This is obviously with 5 included. 5 + 31 + 37 for 4. Thought it didn't need to be said.
We have tons of quantity. I'd rather pay the premium price to secure the franchise player.that would be terrible value as well. Massive overpay to move up 1 spot.
I think Reinbacher's offensive tools and upside are underrated. His transitional skills especially are phenomenal for a 18 yrs old kid, he can skate with the puck, can make short effective little passes, can make long outlet passes, kid is just really smart and already a presence on the ice. I think he will only keep getting better at everything.That's fair. I also value D like Reinbacher more than a ASP when it comes to no. 1 D. For example, Weber was the no. 1 D for team Canada and dude had average offensive skills and an amazing shot. So while some people here are crapping all over Reinbacher, I'm actually closer to you but I still have him outside the top 5
We have tons of quantity. I'd rather pay the premium price to secure the franchise player.
Smith as well, Suzuki, Dach, Smith, Beck not too bad eitherIf we get Carlson at 5, out center depth will be solved for a decade
Precisely. This can’t be emphasized enough. We need premium assets, esp. an elite goal scorer.We have tons of quantity. I'd rather pay the premium price to secure the franchise player.