- Jul 21, 2022
- 2,136
- 2,141
I still consider him a prospectNot eligible for the Calder and I'd be surprised if he doesn't start in the NHL this year.
I still consider him a prospectNot eligible for the Calder and I'd be surprised if he doesn't start in the NHL this year.
Reinbacher is without a doubt the most NHL ready of all prospects, even moreso than Slaf.People seem a bit confused by this ranking. It shouldn't be the most NHL-ready, but the one with the most value, so the one who's likely to be ultimately the best player. In that sense, Reinbacher should be an automatic No. 1, considering that all the others are much later picks, despite their fine progress since then. Yes, Hutson looks promising, but at no time he should be ranked ahead of Reinbacher at this moment, after he has just been taken 5th overall one week ago.
To add: Adam Engstrom
Probably. He's only 7 months older than the third overall pick - Fantilli - and had what I would argue to be an almost equally impressive freshman NCAA season.If you guys think Hutson is a better prospect than Reinbacher, would you have picked him 5th overall this year?
Shit I forgot Emil, put him in after BeckHutson for me
1-Hutson
2-Reinbacher
3-Engstrom
4-Mailloux
5-Roy
6-Beck
7-Farrell
8-Fowler
9-Dobes
10-Mesar
11-Kidney
12-Trudeau
13-Struble
14-Konyushkov
15-Davidson
16-Tuch
17-Kapanen
18-Guindon
19-Rohrer
20-Norlinder
Mich- wait actually Reinbacher.
Reinbacher is without a doubt the most NHL ready of all prospects, even moreso than Slaf.
Agreed however maybe not by as much of a landslide as you have stated.Reinbacher and it’s not even close
Does he go top 5 in 2022?Probably. He's only 7 months older than the third overall pick - Fantilli - and had what I would argue to be an almost equally impressive freshman NCAA season.
People seem a bit confused by this ranking. It shouldn't be the most NHL-ready, but the one with the most value, so the one who's likely to be ultimately the best player. In that sense, Reinbacher should be an automatic No. 1, considering that all the others are much later picks, despite their fine progress since then. Yes, Hutson looks promising, but at no time he should be ranked ahead of Reinbacher at this moment, after he has just been taken 5th overall one week ago.
To add: Adam Engstrom
Where someone is drafted doesn't matter.People seem a bit confused by this ranking. It shouldn't be the most NHL-ready, but the one with the most value, so the one who's likely to be ultimately the best player. In that sense, Reinbacher should be an automatic No. 1, considering that all the others are much later picks, despite their fine progress since then. Yes, Hutson looks promising, but at no time he should be ranked ahead of Reinbacher at this moment, after he has just been taken 5th overall one week ago.
To add: Adam Engstrom
Hutson has a higher potential. He has the talent to become the next Makar/Fox/Hughes.
With what he's shown this past season, I think there's a decent chance he hits his ceiling.
I think Hutson is a little overrated hereAgreed however maybe not by as much of a landslide as you have stated.
If he was in this past draft, with his performance in the NCAA, I think he has a claim for top10 pick. Don’t you?If you guys think Hutson is a better prospect than Reinbacher, would you have picked him 5th overall this year?