Blake wanting to be anywhere but there moment.Two fools, in over their head right from the start.
Blake wanting to be anywhere but there moment.Two fools, in over their head right from the start.
Blake's number should have never went into the rafters in the first place. I don't think BLuc can land this plane.
You win the trivia prize!The silver lining of that crash is that we got the Six Million Dollar Man out of it. Who will be our new bionic GM and coach?
I’ve been saying it for a long time now. They have no fire. No players willing to play on the edge and drag the rest of the team into some shit. And that’s my biggest issue with the leadership of this team from Blake on down. Blake and co should know how those types of players are needed, they played with plenty of them. Instead of going with the Lombardi , Every good army needs a couple of criminals route they’re trying to paint stripes on guys like Grundstrom and Englund(what a f***ing waste this guy has been) and go with team toughness. This ain’t it pal, it’s not working and how do they not see it?This team needs that big dick alpha male energy. Players that are hungry.
Instead we get Grundstrom, Lewis, Kaliyev, JAD who are totally checked out every night.
f*** bring back Lemieux or something.
Unfortunately, AEG bought into the BS BLuc was spewing. I love that BLuc is being exposed as a couple of incompetent fools, but I don't like the delay in seeing the Kings getting busy on the hard path back to being a contender.Come on bud, how are you not lovin it?
100% and I’ve been saying that for as long as possible. This team has no one who is willing to play on the edge and is willing to do something to drag this team into an emotional confrontation, one way or the other. And that’s the biggest issue I have with the leadership on this team from Blake on down and why I had such a huge issue with Doughty’s comments. Oh, we’re upset with guys in the locker room and we stood up and talked to them and yet no one is on this team is willing to do anything on the ice to change this losing mentality in the momentum of these losses piling up. I honestly would not care if either Kopitar Doughty got their asses kicked or stumbled their way through a hug fest extraordinaire at least show some willingness and passion to lead your team out of this black hole that they fallen in. Oblique instead of following the Lombardi, route of every good army needs a couple of criminals. They’re too busy trying to paint stripes on guys like Grundstrom and Englund ( what a colossal f***ing waste this guy has been).This team needs that big dick alpha male energy. Players that are hungry.
Instead we get Grundstrom, Lewis, Kaliyev, JAD who are totally checked out every night.
f*** bring back Lemieux or something.
That’s Kings Hockey babyyyyyySorry I'll go back to lurking but this was the only team that confused me with how I perceive them vs. recent record
rambling a bit:Hey all I literally never come into opposition threads after a win (look at my post history) cause I know it's annoying but I'm not here to talk about the game. I needed clarification over what's happening in LA.
So basically I can't really tell from one single LA game cause hockey is so flukey so my question is how much of it is just a bad stretch (think Edmonton Oilers before turning it around, or the Avs earlier in the season) and how much of it is a fundamental problem of team makeup? It just seems like there's no way this lasts cause I look at the names and I see Kopitar, Fiala, Danault, Kempe, Moore (DU Pioneer!! Represent!), Byfield I know didn't play but in the last game vs the Avs looked like the real deal so he's so very clearly going to be a stud for a long time. Doughty's comments reminded me of when Devon Toews called out the Avs during their slump so could that lead to a turning point?
So ya what am I missing here, just a bad stretch?? Or does there need to be a new GM? Is it just a matter of PLD having to gel with the team first? (Like what is the patience levels with him cause it's tough, i look at so many guys who take a year to gel with a new team vs. other guys who immediately fit in). Is it as simple as what the poster above said - LA needs more guys with an edge?? Sorry I'll go back to lurking but this was the only team that confused me with how I perceive them vs. recent record
You are missing that our 1C and 1D are both well past their primes.Hey all I literally never come into opposition threads after a win (look at my post history) cause I know it's annoying but I'm not here to talk about the game. I needed clarification over what's happening in LA.
So basically I can't really tell from one single LA game cause hockey is so flukey so my question is how much of it is just a bad stretch (think Edmonton Oilers before turning it around, or the Avs earlier in the season) and how much of it is a fundamental problem of team makeup? It just seems like there's no way this lasts cause I look at the names and I see Kopitar, Fiala, Danault, Kempe, Moore (DU Pioneer!! Represent!), Byfield I know didn't play but in the last game vs the Avs looked like the real deal so he's so very clearly going to be a stud for a long time. Doughty's comments reminded me of when Devon Toews called out the Avs during their slump so could that lead to a turning point?
So ya what am I missing here, just a bad stretch?? Or does there need to be a new GM? Is it just a matter of PLD having to gel with the team first? (Like what is the patience levels with him cause it's tough, i look at so many guys who take a year to gel with a new team vs. other guys who immediately fit in). Is it as simple as what the poster above said - LA needs more guys with an edge?? Sorry I'll go back to lurking but this was the only team that confused me with how I perceive them vs. recent record
Hey all I literally never come into opposition threads after a win (look at my post history) cause I know it's annoying but I'm not here to talk about the game. I needed clarification over what's happening in LA.
So basically I can't really tell from one single LA game cause hockey is so flukey so my question is how much of it is just a bad stretch (think Edmonton Oilers before turning it around, or the Avs earlier in the season) and how much of it is a fundamental problem of team makeup? It just seems like there's no way this lasts cause I look at the names and I see Kopitar, Fiala, Danault, Kempe, Moore (DU Pioneer!! Represent!), Byfield I know didn't play but in the last game vs the Avs looked like the real deal so he's so very clearly going to be a stud for a long time. Doughty's comments reminded me of when Devon Toews called out the Avs during their slump so could that lead to a turning point?
So ya what am I missing here, just a bad stretch?? Or does there need to be a new GM? Is it just a matter of PLD having to gel with the team first? (Like what is the patience levels with him cause it's tough, i look at so many guys who take a year to gel with a new team vs. other guys who immediately fit in). Is it as simple as what the poster above said - LA needs more guys with an edge?? Sorry I'll go back to lurking but this was the only team that confused me with how I perceive them vs. recent record
The Kings’ problems stem more from Blake than McLellan. The perception of Kopitar and Doughty are a lot better than the reality at this point yet that didn’t stop Blake from adding secondary star players to supplement them as if they’re both in their mid 20’s. This streak is a worst case scenario of what happens when 8 and 11 run out of gas and the diet stars behind them also slump but even when things were clicking earlier in the year the Kings were still struggling against good teams and were overly reliant on a hot Talbot.Hey all I literally never come into opposition threads after a win (look at my post history) cause I know it's annoying but I'm not here to talk about the game. I needed clarification over what's happening in LA.
So basically I can't really tell from one single LA game cause hockey is so flukey so my question is how much of it is just a bad stretch (think Edmonton Oilers before turning it around, or the Avs earlier in the season) and how much of it is a fundamental problem of team makeup? It just seems like there's no way this lasts cause I look at the names and I see Kopitar, Fiala, Danault, Kempe, Moore (DU Pioneer!! Represent!), Byfield I know didn't play but in the last game vs the Avs looked like the real deal so he's so very clearly going to be a stud for a long time. Doughty's comments reminded me of when Devon Toews called out the Avs during their slump so could that lead to a turning point?
So ya what am I missing here, just a bad stretch?? Or does there need to be a new GM? Is it just a matter of PLD having to gel with the team first? (Like what is the patience levels with him cause it's tough, i look at so many guys who take a year to gel with a new team vs. other guys who immediately fit in). Is it as simple as what the poster above said - LA needs more guys with an edge?? Sorry I'll go back to lurking but this was the only team that confused me with how I perceive them vs. recent record
Yeah but they’re all really close friends. Don’t underestimate the power of friendship!I’ve been saying it for a long time now. They have no fire. No players willing to play on the edge and drag the rest of the team into some shit. And that’s my biggest issue with the leadership of this team from Blake on down. Blake and co should know how those types of players are needed, they played with plenty of them. Instead of going with the Lombardi , Every good army needs a couple of criminals route they’re trying to paint stripes on guys like Grundstrom and Englund(what a f***ing waste this guy has been) and go with team toughness. This ain’t it pal, it’s not working and how do they not see it?
The Kings were starting to have issues playing more than 1 or 2 good periods in a game in early December, but they were still winning. Gavrikov got hurt against the Islanders and the Kings blew a 2 goal lead without him for their first road loss of the season. He played only a handful of minutes the next day in a loss at NYR. They came home and got destroyed at the hands of Vilardi. The team has struggled since despite Gavrikov returning.Hey all I literally never come into opposition threads after a win (look at my post history) cause I know it's annoying but I'm not here to talk about the game. I needed clarification over what's happening in LA.
So basically I can't really tell from one single LA game cause hockey is so flukey so my question is how much of it is just a bad stretch (think Edmonton Oilers before turning it around, or the Avs earlier in the season) and how much of it is a fundamental problem of team makeup? It just seems like there's no way this lasts cause I look at the names and I see Kopitar, Fiala, Danault, Kempe, Moore (DU Pioneer!! Represent!), Byfield I know didn't play but in the last game vs the Avs looked like the real deal so he's so very clearly going to be a stud for a long time. Doughty's comments reminded me of when Devon Toews called out the Avs during their slump so could that lead to a turning point?
So ya what am I missing here, just a bad stretch?? Or does there need to be a new GM? Is it just a matter of PLD having to gel with the team first? (Like what is the patience levels with him cause it's tough, i look at so many guys who take a year to gel with a new team vs. other guys who immediately fit in). Is it as simple as what the poster above said - LA needs more guys with an edge?? Sorry I'll go back to lurking but this was the only team that confused me with how I perceive them vs. recent record
Luc, I knew the man who built the 2012 team, Dean Lombardi. Current Mr. Kings President, you're no Dean Lombardi.
The sooner BLuc is fired, the better.
The biggest shocker of the season is that the goaltending isn’t holding up. I mean, what was Blake supposed to do?
Cheeseman, but under his tenure overseeing the LA Galaxy and LA Kings have been craptastic for AEG the past ten years. He probably needs to go as well because he doesn’t have standards for winning.who's above Luc, because thats where this is going to come from. Someone above has to be paying attention by now.