That's what happened, they gave the award to Barkov. There was a voting, and Barkov won.Should just have given the award to Barkov straight away.
These "nominees" are just the top-3 of the voting, revealed before the winner is revealed later.
That's what happened, they gave the award to Barkov. There was a voting, and Barkov won.Should just have given the award to Barkov straight away.
You are riding a lot off a 36 game sample size with that PPG.You can't make both of these arguments in good faith:
"Nylander had 98 points on the season, hardly disappearing "
And:
"His .97 points per game is a similar pace to his career average"
Especially considering the drop off from 1.46 ppg to .97.
As for whether I have a high opinion of Nylander. He is a very good offensive player who has the tools to be a top 10 offensive player in the league.
He is comfortably the 2nd most individually skilled and gifted player on his team, with better skating, passing than Matthews, and a much better shot and physical ability than Marner.
And yet, he is 3rd fiddle to those 2 guys year in, and year out despite being older.
Why?
Because he doesn't think the game at the same level as the other 2.
That mental incapacity limits his ability to utilize others effectively, and his poor judgment is at times a hindrance.
Also the phobia of helping out defensively or to take and deliver hits is incredibly infuriating, not to mention how much of a liability it makes him outside of the attacking phase of the game.
It happened this year. The 69 goal scorer was also Selke finalist.When have we seen a player score 69 or more goals and lead the league in goals by a wide margin while having Selke level defense? It hasn't happened, which is why its one of the greatest seasons of all time.
There, I am glad I could be the first person to tell you that.
What’s his name? I wanna look this player up.It happened this year. The 69 goal scorer was also Selke finalist.
It is right in the title: the finalists are named there.What’s his name? I wanna look this player up.
It happened this year. The 69 goal scorer was also Selke finalist.
It equates both to the winner and to the finalists. That is the reason they were voted on. The winner is deemed to the player who demonstrates the most skill in the defensive component of the game. The other two are runners up as voted on by the PHWA.No it didn't. Selke level defense does not equate to Selke finalist.
June 27? I'll checkNot related to this particular award. Is there going to be no award show or will there be an we just got spoilers. What's the point of the award show anyway? I used to like it.
June 27? I'll check
NHL EVENTS | NHL.com
The official National Hockey League website including news, rosters, stats, schedules, teams, and video.www.nhl.com
I don't know if there is a point. I don't plan on watching.But what's the point now? Maybe I'm childish but I really don't understand why with awards and draft picks reporters find the need to let everyone know. You watch so that the presenter tells you who wins / gets drafted. I hate this new nonsense.
No it doesn’t. 165 people voted for Barkov number 1. He was the obvious choice, and those runner up votes are always a joke.It equates both to the winner and to the finalists. That is the reason they were voted on. The winner is deemed to the player who demonstrates the most skill in the defensive component of the game. The other two are runners up as voted on by the PHWA.
Barkov was the winner and is the best defensive forward in the game. The runner up votes are not a joke though.No it doesn’t. 165 people voted for Barkov number 1. He was the obvious choice, and those runner up votes are always a joke.
Mackinnon got a vote. Nathan MacKinnon almost won the Art Ross while playing Selke level defense! Quick, someone start the thread.
They are a joke. Media members giving votes to gain access has been happening for awhile.Barkov was the winner and is the best defensive forward in the game. The runner up votes are not a joke though.
Sarcasm bud. 2 Toronto media members giving Matthews a vote and 1 giving Marner a vote shows they couldn’t even get on the same page.Besides, you can start the Nathan Mackinnon thread. If you think it is threadworthy, you don't have to have someone else do it.
Have the votes been made public?They are a joke. Media members giving votes to gain access has been happening for awhile.
Sarcasm bud. 2 Toronto media members giving Matthews a vote and 1 giving Marner a vote shows they couldn’t even get on the same page.
Most people know some media members give votes to gain access and don’t need a thread reminding them. If you’re job is in the Toronto media and relies on Auston Matthews liking you in order to get sound bytes and things to write about throughout the season, you best believe they are looking for any excuse to vote for him.
Yes, they are, Seravalli releases them. 165 first place votes out of 193 for Barkov. It was posted on here somewhere.Have the votes been made public?
Yeah, that was in earlier posts. I actually meant the list of who voted for whom.Yes, they are, Seravalli releases them. 165 first place votes out of 193 for Barkov. It was posted on here somewhere.
They are a joke. Media members giving votes to gain access has been happening for awhile.
To players. Play empowerment is crazy, and if the player doesn’t like you then you won’t get good soundbytes, answers to your questions, or favorable time.Gain access to what?
That is a bunch on nonsense that you just made up.To players. Play empowerment is crazy, and if the player doesn’t like you then you won’t get good soundbytes, answers to your questions, or favorable time.
Players feed into it too. They know which media member did or didn’t vote them on major awards. These major awards can influence contracts and compensation in a big way. Considering how close Matthews was from being a finalist to not even being top 5, those 2 number 1 media votes had a big impact and may help Matthews in contract negotiations.
Agents leak a lot of information too, and you want them to pick up the phone when you call. They do that when you write good stories about their client, and when you vote for their client on major awards.
How old are you?That is a bunch on nonsense that you just made up.
No one should take these awards seriously anymore anyways if Matthews was nominated for this award. Rocket? Yes but Selke? No
They are a joke. Media members giving votes to gain access has been happening for awhile.
Sarcasm bud. 2 Toronto media members giving Matthews a vote and 1 giving Marner a vote shows they couldn’t even get on the same page.
Most people know some media members give votes to gain access and don’t need a thread reminding them. If you’re job is in the Toronto media and relies on Auston Matthews liking you in order to get sound bytes and things to write about throughout the season, you best believe they are looking for any excuse to vote for him.