2023-24 Bill LaForge Trophy (Worst Coach)

Hasbro

Family Friend
Sponsor
Apr 1, 2004
53,060
17,283
South Rectangle
Is the criteria that they have to have coached the whole season? Because if fired coaches count, Babcock is the runaway winner, and Woodcroft a close second
The opposite. Babcock pulling a Friday boosts his case.

1720884880511.png
 

sabremike

#1 Tageaholic
Aug 30, 2010
23,547
35,943
Brewster, NY
Don Granato. Clueless, tactically inept and badly outcoached on a nightly basis. Never would have got an NHL head coaching from a real organization in the first place and would've been sacked in December if just about the most unqualified GM hire of all time didn't hand him a completely unnecessary contract extension that hadn't even kicked in yet. If there's a version of this award for worst assistant Matt Ellis should win it in unanimous fashion.
 

Bjornar Moxnes

Registered User
Oct 16, 2016
11,852
4,342
Troms og Finnmark
Don Granato. Clueless, tactically inept and badly outcoached on a nightly basis. Never would have got an NHL head coaching from a real organization in the first place and would've been sacked in December if just about the most unqualified GM hire of all time didn't hand him a completely unnecessary contract extension that hadn't even kicked in yet. If there's a version of this award for worst assistant Matt Ellis should win it in unanimous fashion.
Yeah both Granato and Smith were awful. How in the world did a single division have these two clowns?
 
  • Like
Reactions: sabremike

cptjeff

Reprehensible User
Sep 18, 2008
21,237
37,284
Washington, DC.
Is the criteria that they have to have coached the whole season? Because if fired coaches count, Babcock is the runaway winner, and Woodcroft a close second
I'd still give it to Woodcroft. Babcock may have had a spectacular implosion, but Woodcroft had a Stanley Cup Finalist roster in the basement of the league over a sustained period. That is incredibly difficult to do.
 

HockeyGuy1964

Registered User
Oct 7, 2013
4,273
5,110
I'd still give it to Woodcroft. Babcock may have had a spectacular implosion, but Woodcroft had a Stanley Cup Finalist roster in the basement of the league over a sustained period. That is incredibly difficult to do.
No, it was actually pretty easy to do if you never watched a game.
Woodcroft got laughable, ridiculously bad goaltending for the first 13 games before he was fired. Nobody, not even Scotty Bowman, was winning with that kind of goaltending & McDavid & Ekholm were both not healthy.
 

ijuka

Registered User
May 14, 2016
23,036
16,139
Is the criteria that they have to have coached the whole season? Because if fired coaches count, Babcock is the runaway winner, and Woodcroft a close second
How on earth is Woodcroft a close second?

Are you suggesting he was supposed to hypnotize Skinner to not have .780 goaltending, or what?

Or are you only looking at the results without considering what parts of the game a coach can actually influence?
 

belair

Win it for Ben!
Apr 9, 2010
39,187
22,676
Canada
How on earth is Woodcroft a close second?

Are you suggesting he was supposed to hypnotize Skinner to not have .780 goaltending, or what?

Or are you only looking at the results without considering what parts of the game a coach can actually influence?
He tried to implement the Bruins' zone system that was designed to essentially beat Vegas four months after they lost in the WCSF. His inability to get the team to execute it was a big reason why Skinner's numbers tanked at the beginning of the year.

The team looked like trash for the first dozen games.
 

HockeyGuy1964

Registered User
Oct 7, 2013
4,273
5,110
He tried to implement the Bruins' zone system that was designed to essentially beat Vegas four months after they lost in the WCSF. His inability to get the team to execute it was a big reason why Skinner's numbers tanked at the beginning of the year.

The team looked like trash for the first dozen games.
No.
Skinner's & Campbell's numbers tanked because they played absolutely terrible during that stretch. Their collective xGAA was basically the exact same for those 13 games as it was down the stretch after they got Ekholm the previous season. Their actual GAA was more than a goal higher than the xGAA &, I'm sorry, no team is ever winning consistently when that happens.
 

belair

Win it for Ben!
Apr 9, 2010
39,187
22,676
Canada
No.
Skinner's & Campbell's numbers tanked because they played absolutely terrible during that stretch. Their collective xGAA was basically the exact same for those 13 games as it was down the stretch after they got Ekholm the previous season. Their actual GAA was more than a goal higher than the xGAA &, I'm sorry, no team is ever winning consistently when that happens.
Those stats are highly irrelevant in that short of a sample. The goals frequently came from NZ turnovers and DZ breakdowns and a high number of those GAs came from Grade A shots that most goalies don't stop.

The fact that Skinner's numbers did a complete 180 following the coaching change show you how much the team's play in front of the goalie impacts his individual performance.

You could've had Hallebuyck in net, that team was still going to be sub-500.
 

Ianturnedbull

Registered User
Jun 11, 2022
5,505
4,944
I thought Keefe had a decent year, but then he had his team push for the Milestone Cup at the end of the season.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad