Speculation: 2023-24-25 Sharks Roster Discussion

[Star Platinum]

What did he do?

I told you it was about the Griddy

 

[Lebanezer]

Me watching the replies:

 

[gaucholoco3]

I think he is being punished for playing hurt and not being honest about how he was compromised during the game. It would track with Walman saying “ it is not, not about the injury”

 

[Anomie2029]

I think Warsofsky should come out tomorrow and make another vague statement about the scratching. I'm sure it'll end the speculation.

 

[Timo Time]

I think Warsofsky should come out tomorrow and make another vague statement about the scratching. I'm sure it'll end the speculation.

He had concepts of a reason

 

[OrrNumber4]

I think he is being punished for playing hurt and not being honest about how he was compromised during the game. It would track with Walman saying “ it is not, not about the injury”

Flashes of Toskala costing the Sharks a series...

 

[Hodge]

What did he do?

 

[OrrNumber4]

Not sure I want Eklund playing with Celebrini.

It was the issue playing Setoguchi with Thornton. Instead of developing into a solid player by his own right, he became an accessory to Thornton; believing his success is due to his play and not Thornton being Thornton.

If that's all the Sharks see Eklund as (a great complimentary player), then go ahead...but if they aren't trying to win games and think Eklund can be a dominant player, keep them separated.

 

[Pinkfloyd]

Not sure I want Eklund playing with Celebrini.

It was the issue playing Setoguchi with Thornton. Instead of developing into a solid player by his own right, he became an accessory to Thornton; believing his success is due to his play and not Thornton being Thornton.

If that's all the Sharks see Eklund as (a great complimentary player), then go ahead...but if they aren't trying to win games and think Eklund can be a dominant player, keep them separated.

I would equate it more to something like Marleau and Thornton until Smith proves he's better at some point. They need to play together occasionally because they're the two best players and you need them together in scoring situations sometimes. But they don't have to play together and maybe shouldn't to give the lineup some consistent pressure on multiple lines. Since this is still the team in a development phase, they should be going back and forth often having the two of them play together and having them not play together.

 

[gaucholoco3]

I really like the Shark commitment to developing Smith as a C. His value it greatly diminished if he is moved to wing and with this season being a development year it is important to stick to the plan even if their are growing pains.

With that said, there is a log jam of top 9 C’s on this team. Granlund is infinitely more valuable as a C and Wennberg has played exclusively C in his career. I think it is time to either try Wennberg at wing or even move Sturm to wing and roll 4 even lines.

72/21-71-73
23-64-20
21/72-2-11
91-7-53

Or if keeping all 4 at C then maybe

91-71-73
7-64-20
72-2-11
23-21-53

Those are 4 lines that can be rolled evenly.

 

[TheBeard]

I really like the Shark commitment to developing Smith as a C. His value it greatly diminished if he is moved to wing and with this season being a development year it is important to stick to the plan even if their are growing pains.

With that said, there is a log jam of top 9 C’s on this team. Granlund is infinitely more valuable as a C and Wennberg has played exclusively C in his career. I think it is time to either try Wennberg at wing or even move Sturm to wing and roll 4 even lines.

72/21-71-73
23-64-20
21/72-2-11
91-7-53

Or if keeping all 4 at C then maybe

91-71-73
7-64-20
72-2-11
23-21-53

Those are 4 lines that can be rolled evenly.

My only issue is playing him with two inferior offensive wingers. I think he can learn a lot from them but developing as a top 6 center isn't gonna happen if he's playing with linemates that can't take advantage of what he excels at. I'd rather he play wing with more skilled linemates for a while until the game really slows down for him and he doesn't have to be THE focal point of the line. It seemed to work for Eklund last year.

 

[DG93]

Not sure I want Eklund playing with Celebrini.

It was the issue playing Setoguchi with Thornton. Instead of developing into a solid player by his own right, he became an accessory to Thornton; believing his success is due to his play and not Thornton being Thornton.

If that's all the Sharks see Eklund as (a great complimentary player), then go ahead...but if they aren't trying to win games and think Eklund can be a dominant player, keep them separated.

I don't agree with this. I'd argue that Celebrini and Eklund complement each other nicely, so it won't stunt Eklund's development whatsoever.

 

[Juxtaposer]

I think Granlund definitely needs to go back to center. He's played three games at wing all year and looked bad in all of them. Problem is that we only have like three passable wingers, so it's hard to even figure out what to do with them unless we want to keep Smith with his current linemates (we don't).

Kunin-Celebrini-Toffoli
Wennberg-Granlund-Zetterlund
Eklund-Smith-Dellandrea
Grundstrom-Sturm-Goodrow

Best I could come up with and I don't even like it.