Sheng is overall great but he definitely has his moments where I feel like his inexperience in this arena shows and can lead to some weirdness.I think hes just not used to being asked real questions. Sheng can get a little adventurous and Grier hasnt been in a public facing role before hiring.
Wasn’t he still the Center when Perreault was hurt and Cutter played with Smith and Leonard?Smith should start his career on the wing. I think he will get killed playing center in the NHL next season. Most of the time he wasn’t even playing center in college.
Given the nature of his injury, I cannot imagine a team trading for Couture. The Sharks do not need the cap space and would not want to attach the assets to move him out as an LTIR move for another team.In Warsofsky presser, Grier contradicted reports that he's looking to trade Couture.
Yeah, I honestly think this was purely a public show of loyalty to Cooch and kind of another "I'm a player's GM" stake in the ground for Grier. Could also indicate Cooch is going through it right now.Given the nature of his injury, I cannot imagine a team trading for Couture. The Sharks do not need the cap space and would not want to attach the assets to move him out as an LTIR move for another team.
Yes Smith played exclusively at C in collegeWasn’t he still the Center when Perreault was hurt and Cutter played with Smith and Leonard?
Everything I have read is that he thrives in the middle of the ice and is a natural Center. Defensively in the NHL the first forward back plays low in the zone so it is not as big of a deal to have him playing C.
Bedard got moved off C because he is a natural scoring winger. He exits the zone early to look for transition plays from Defensemen whereas Smith comes low to initiate breakouts himself. I always thought Bedard had no NHL future at C but will be miscast there since he will be the most talented player in his team.
I would rather have Celebrini over Bedard in any case except for trying to market and sell tickets.
I get it and I’d like to get better players for Smith but the point of Sturm would be to take the defensive responsibilities. I’d like to upgrade on Kostin there but oh well. I’d be okay with that line.Playing Smith on a line where he’s the only one that can finish seems like a huge mistake to me. I like Sturm but he doesn’t belong on a line with Smith.
I don't think this is ideal at the start of the season, but Kostin/Smith/Eklund might be interesting as a 2a or 2b line if Kostin still looks like he could put in 20. Depends on how Lund line is doing at 1.Yes Smith played exclusively at C in college
I get it and I’d like to get better players for Smith but the point of Sturm would be to take the defensive responsibilities. I’d like to upgrade on Kostin there but oh well. I’d be okay with that line.
I’ve always liked Atkinson. He’d be a solid addition for next season even though he’s a shell of his former self.
Sad I would have liked Atkinson
Agreed. He needs to be paired with a finisher given how much of his skillset is passing.Playing Smith on a line where he’s the only one that can finish seems like a huge mistake to me. I like Sturm but he doesn’t belong on a line with Smith.
The Bay Area, as a whole, is very weak when it comes to sports journalism. The guys who cover the Warriors are yes men who get fed stories by the team, cover trade rumors that will never happen, and have no interesting thoughts of their own. The 49ers used to have Ira Miller a long time ago who could give you a good analysis of a game, but their guys are largely the same. David Lombardi may as well have "49ers Public Relations" as his title instead of pretending he's an actual journalist. Susan Slusser is okay, but she's a meat and potatoes kind of beat writer who's not going to give you any great insights.Sheng is overall great but he definitely has his moments where I feel like his inexperience in this arena shows and can lead to some weirdness.
Smith played C the entire year, so I disagree with Hodge on that one. He definitely played C for Cutter and Leonard.Wasn’t he still the Center when Perreault was hurt and Cutter played with Smith and Leonard?
Everything I have read is that he thrives in the middle of the ice and is a natural Center. Defensively in the NHL the first forward back plays low in the zone so it is not as big of a deal to have him playing C.
Bedard got moved off C because he is a natural scoring winger. He exits the zone early to look for transition plays from Defensemen whereas Smith comes low to initiate breakouts himself. I always thought Bedard had no NHL future at C but will be miscast there since he will be the most talented player in his team.
I would rather have Celebrini over Bedard in any case except for trying to market and sell tickets.
Atkinson is a Boston boy, maybe Grier can work some magic?I’ve always liked Atkinson. He’d be a solid addition for next season even though he’s a shell of his former self.
I had a really good conversation with him at the all-star game in SJ. I’ve also followed CBJ for a while and he sounds like a great locker room leader.
This is a great opportunity for the Sharks to potentially move up a few spots.
#14 for #12 & Atkinson (1 year/$5.875m)
This is where Grier trying to be a “player’s GM” is put to the test. Can he convince guys with trade protection to come to SJ? Does the presence of Macklin and Smith do anything to sway opinion?
Kostin/Joshua-Smith-Granlund is the type of line that makes sense for me. F1 with size, physicality, and some finish paired with another playmaker that can share some center duty and also play RW. Would sort of be shocked if Smith is not with Granlund to start next season.Agreed. He needs to be paired with a finisher given how much of his skillset is passing.
This is all I was getting at. Regardless of what the lineup card said or who took the faceoffs, every time I watched BC Smith functioned like a winger without the puck.However, Hodge is kind of right in that he didn't play C defensively in a very structured manner. "Bedard exits the zone early to look for transition plays from Defensemen whereas Smith comes low to initiate breakouts himself" I did not find to be consistently true when I watched BC. He definitely still fled the zone looking for the transition game, and sometimes he did it and sometimes Leonard or Perreault did it. Not a heavily structured breakout game. I am sure he can do it, but there's some uncertainty there at the NHL level vs. Celebrini who excelled at creating turnovers in the D zone (Smith's turnovers were mostly from forechecking) and then breaking out to attack, either carrying the puck himself or passing out of the zone.
Doubt it probably a buyout. Actually you might be right cause buyout window isn’t open.
Mutual contract termination?
He'd be throwing away more than $11 million, so I can't see that.
Mutual contract termination?
The Rangers waiving a guy who scored 6 goals in 16 playoff games shows that no one believes it’s sustainable in the least.