Star Platinum
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2025
- 5,618
- 10,939
Sherwood isn't going to be on the Shark's top power play unit like he was in Vancouver. His goal scoring is going to plummet.Sherwood's shot rate means he will score 20 goals in a season even at his career average SH% of 11.3
Graf's shot rate means he needs to shoot 18% to score 20 goals in a season
At the right price, Graf is the kind of guy you can make an effective third line out of that provides some defensive resistance while not being useless offensively and who can be a decent third wing on a Top 2 line when injuries strike your better players.Paying Graf $6 million a year to be like our 8th best forward is not a good use of cap space.
Graf untradable albatross
Advocate Nurse
I big smart
This good logic
I have come around to agreeing with this. I think Grier has no interest in going after a big fish and trading big futures to do it.The Sharks don't need a big fish to add to their blue line to move forward with their process. We need to just take the best deal available to fill a hole on the blue line and work through it until something better comes along while getting some development from the younger players.
I was having a nice relaxing summer until you guys made me think about our penalty killI’d argue we’d have had a top 15 PK with the pieces we did if it wasn’t for Houda’s INSANELY stupid capped wedge PK. It made Graf look good but the system as a whole is a complete liability. One single guy pressuring and the other three just standing still in a triangle.
Hasnt gone well in OTT... i remember when everyone was freaking out about losing Zetterlund.... good times.
It still means claiming Kesselring was their #6 is objectively incorrectHere's the value of looking at TOI per game for defensemen as evidence of their value/ability.
#3: Ferraro
#4: Klingberg
#6: Llijegren
He just doesn't do enough to justify having him back imo, especially if we end up drafting Stenberg. The Sharks need to put all of their energy into building the defense.I'd happily trade Ottawa Goodrow and the fourth round pick we just got from Boston to get him back if they're having buyer's remorse. Put him, Graf, and Wennberg on a third line and you've got a decent third scoring line and then you can put Sherwood down on the fourth line where he belongs.
Could be worse. You could be thinking about the powerplay.I was having a nice relaxing summer until you guys made me think about our penalty kill
![]()
Watching Carolina in the playoffs did that for me every other day. In that sense, I'm glad hockey is done for a few months.Could be worse. You could be thinking about the powerplay.
If they put a little energy into making me not have to watch Goodrow this year, it would bring me some small sliver of happiness, which I thoroughly deserve.He just doesn't do enough to justify having him back imo, especially if we end up drafting Stenberg. The Sharks need to put all of their energy into building the defense.
If they don't get a big fish, they need not to get a Surströmming. I'd rather make Cagnoni the third pairing LHD and live with Orlov at #1LHD and Dickinson at #2LHD than to add either Rielly or Nurse to this squad.The Sharks don't need a big fish to add to their blue line to move forward with their process. We need to just take the best deal available to fill a hole on the blue line and work through it until something better comes along while getting some development from the younger players.
happiness, which I thoroughly deserve.
I got permanently banned on Reddit so I can’t even troll the idiots there anymoreWatching Carolina in the playoffs did that for me every other day. In that sense, I'm glad hockey is done for a few months.
eh.. id rather keep the pick and have 1 more year of Goodrow than 3 additional with Zetterlund. Its pretty clear how SJ wants their 3/4 lines to play. Zetterlund isnt good enough defensively or good enough on the forecheck to be a 4 year investment.I'd happily trade Ottawa Goodrow and the fourth round pick we just got from Boston to get him back if they're having buyer's remorse. Put him, Graf, and Wennberg on a third line and you've got a decent third scoring line and then you can put Sherwood down on the fourth line where he belongs.
6x6 for Graf could be an absolute steal in 2-3 years.As for graf, I expect 5 x 5M or a bridge, 2 x 4M. I would be shocked to see Grier give him 6M, though it's not impossible. Hes a very valuable player with his PK work and that he can slot in anywhere.
Yes it is. They want to have three lines that they pretend are good on defense because if they can't score, they must be really hard to play against for the other team. Only they're not. So if we aren't going to have lines that are good at defense, I'd rather have lower level scoring lines that at least can pot a goal now and then.eh.. id rather keep the pick and have 1 more year of Goodrow than 3 additional with Zetterlund. Its pretty clear how SJ wants their 3/4 lines to play.
I swear half this board cannot read basic stats.Here's the value of looking at TOI per game for defensemen as evidence of their value/ability.
#3: Ferraro
#4: Klingberg
#6: Llijegren