- Feb 12, 2008
- 19,991
- 9,531
not in my lifetime.
They’re always good…..
Until the playoffs start
not in my lifetime.
Missing the playoffs every year but three is good?Weren’t the leafs good?
I hear what you are saying and I agree the masses are not saying it’s one or the other. But I think some are putting way to much faith in the thought that removing van Ryn will make us so much better. Who are we replacing him with? Someone that really doesn’t have much track record.I don't think anyone is saying it was all the coaches fault. I have been on the "We are bringing on the wrong Defensemen" and "what are we doing with our defensive scheme/fire Van Ryn" trains for awhile. Its the old meme "Is it bad coaching or bad players? Both? Both. Both is good," Except here, as it is two bad things, both is very, very not good.
can we move these posts about the Leafs to the main board just for fun?not in my lifetime.
It’s Ratcliffe vs Ritchie for a roster spot. I’m not sure yet.There’s no way Ritchie doesn’t make this team and plays a lot. Berube is going to love him since we’ve been so soft the past couple years.
Blais, Sunny, Toro, Ritchie. I see what you’re doing Army
You literally just debated Likens post in the post you said not every post needed to be debated and the rebuttal wasn’t reflective of what Likens was talking about. Seems quite confusing.They’re averaging 100+ pts over the last 7 years
You guys need to quit being so argumentative over every persons post. This is not a debate forum. Every post doesn’t need to be analyzed and debated. Sometimes, if you don’t agree, just shut your f***ing mouth and move on.
I would love to see the reactions, but having been a Mod, it would be pretty mean to put them though all the Mod work that would ensue.can we move these posts about the Leafs to the main board just for fun?
You know what? That DID make me feel better.I think everyone is just a little tense with opening night just 16 days away, so try what I do and go watch Lemieux plant Draper into the boards and think happy thoughts
Ratcliffe looked pretty good tonight. Didn't really notice Ritchie except for the fight.It’s Ratcliffe vs Ritchie for a roster spot. I’m not sure yet.
Cujo was the last goalie that the Blues had that could get away with so many rebounds. He did it on purpose & was a master at it. He directed rebounds so that he was in position for the secondary shot - he said it made his stats look better. At least he was honest.Binnington was the only reason we had a chance in most games but no, it's all on him.
Could you imagine if we used a defense strategy that played to our weaknesses and strengths? Like maybe box out, gather and control reobunds? Our defense didn't box anyone out. Binnington routinely had no help in front of the or around the crease at all. But no! It's all on Binnington.
Bozak looked good on the Leafs.
Don’t think so. He is currently injured and there’s been no details as to how long he’s expected to be out though.Did we already release Ratcliffe?
Interesting I figured Ritchie would make the team.Abramov, Callin, Dickinson, Heim, Hoelscher, Blakabutuka, Duszak, Gaudet, Osmanski, Skinner, Cranley, and Zherenko sent down. Ritchie and Welinski released from their PTOs.
And if you're wondering, the average size of that bottom 6 is 6'4", 211 lb.
I mostly agree with this but I still have some questions about who will take that next step. I love that we brought back Blais and Sundqvist too, but due to their style of play, I think we know they will inevitably get hurt at some point. So who else can bring what they do when they’re missing? MacEachern and Walker are depth pieces to fill in for a few games here and there, but they can’t be counted on for much more than that.I'm a big fan of the identity we have going in our bottom 6. I love that we brought back Blais and Sundqvist, and I'm high on Toropchenko. Throw in Neighbours and Alexandrov, and we've got some gritty depth. In a league that has slowly gotten softer, I find it important to have a bottom 6 that can take advantage of more and more opposing players being allergic to physicality. I like a skilled top 6, and speed is a plus, but gimme that physicality in the bottom 6. Even looking back to our Cup win, you could see that our depth in the bottom half of the lineup was very important to our success. Steen-Sundqvist-Barbashev was a nasty 4th line that would hit everything that moved, and Maroon/Bozak on the 3rd line were no slouches either. Our physicality in the bottom 6 was a big part of our success and I'm glad we're gaining that identity back, even if it's in a year where we aren't expected to contend.
I'd like to see Ratcliffe given a chance as well, at least as a guy that can draw into the 4th line when we want more size. He looked good in the game against the Blue Jackets. Blais also threw a bunch of big hits, he looked like he was playing angry.
Buchnevich - Thomas - Kyrou
Saad - Schenn - Vrana
Neighbours - Hayes - Blais
Ratcliffe - Sundqvist - Toropchenko
Kapanen, Alexandrov
And if you're wondering, the average size of that bottom 6 is 6'4", 211 lb.
I slid Ratcliffe in there for the fun of it, but the rest of those guys are are going to be in the lineup regardless, so I'm not just putting them together because of their size. If we want to have our best 6 forwards in the top 6, then that is simply how the bottom 6 shakes out with who's left (minus Ratcliffe). So those are certainly realistic lines.And the average time it takes them to skate up the ice is 6 minutes, 4 seconds. The average number of goals they will give up per minute is 2.11.
Ok that is sarcasm. obviously. I know Toropchenko is fast, and Sunny is good defensively. But the point still stands, if you are picking your lines by size, you are doing it wrong. Size is useful, but only if you have skill as well.
Toropchenko is my player to watch.I mostly agree with this but I still have some questions about who will take that next step. I love that we brought back Blais and Sundqvist too, but due to their style of play, I think we know they will inevitably get hurt at some point. So who else can bring what they do when they’re missing? MacEachern and Walker are depth pieces to fill in for a few games here and there, but they can’t be counted on for much more than that.
We really need Neighbours, Alexandrov and Toro to show improvement and become reliable players. And to be honest, I’m not seeing it so far in preseason as I think they’ve looked largely invisible. Of course we have to take preseason with a grain of salt because it doesn’t mean much and maybe they’ll turn it on when the real games start, but my confidence level in them being better than last season is currently kinda low. We will be in trouble if our young players don’t produce.
Hopefully Ratcliffe can get healthy and get a spot so we can see what he’s made of. It will be interesting to see how the lineup shakes out. Maybe there’s someone off our radar that gets a look too, or a young player in Springfield earns an early callup and doesn’t look back. I don’t know, but one of these things needs to happen to shore up our depth.