Blue Jays GDT: 2022 v1 | Wed, Apr 13 | @ NYY | 7:00pm ET/4:00pm PT | Berrios vs Cole

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

How excited are you for the 2022 Blue Jays season?

  • Extremely excited

    Votes: 45 47.4%
  • Incredibly excited

    Votes: 5 5.3%
  • Very excited

    Votes: 11 11.6%
  • Supremely excited

    Votes: 4 4.2%
  • Tremendously excited

    Votes: 4 4.2%
  • Immensely excited

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • Highly excited

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Excited to the extent that I can't express it in words

    Votes: 4 4.2%
  • *unintelligible noises of excitement*

    Votes: 12 12.6%
  • I want to be a contrarian and pick a 'not excited' option, but I know deep down that'd be a lie

    Votes: 9 9.5%

  • Total voters
    95
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think there needs to be a rule change. In cases where the review is inconclusive I don't think the team should lose their challenge. The league cannot prove they were wrong to challenge, just we couldn't tell what happened so we go with the call on the field. Losing the challenge is harsh there IMO. Cases where it's that close should be looked at. It's the bogus obvious calls with time waste challenges that should be penalized by losing your challenge
 
Jansen pinch runner here? He should come into the game defensively for the save anyway

Lol duh.Katoh pinch runner, and then Jansen defensively makes way more sense. I forgot here was here
 
I think there needs to be a rule change. In cases where the review is inconclusive I don't think the team should lose their challenge. The league cannot prove they were wrong to challenge, just we couldn't tell what happened so we go with the call on the field. Losing the challenge is harsh there IMO. Cases where it's that close should be looked at. It's the bogus obvious calls with time waste challenges that should be penalized by losing your challenge

Problem is that will potentially cause more wasted time as teams challenge any and all iffy/borderline calls that are potentially inconclusive knowing that it's likely to be a "free" challenge.
 
No need to bunt there with Espinal up next. Either Tapia grounds into a force out and he's at first, or he's out some other way and Katoh's at first. Espinal will hit a HR or double for sure and the run scores regardless of whether he's at 2nd or 1st
 
Problem is that will potentially cause more wasted time as teams challenge any and all iffy/borderline calls that are potentially inconclusive knowing that it's likely to be a "free" challenge.

How many things are truly inconclusive though? catch/no catch usually isn't. force plays usually aren't. I can only think of tag plays as ones that are commonly inconclusive. I don't think it would have a noticeable increase in challenges. If it close enough to be inconclusive teams usually challenge anyway(or ask the umps to look if they've burned theirs)
 
If the Rangers were gonna win, these last 2 games were the games to do it. Had them on the ropes in the 1st and only got 2 runs, couldn't mount solid attacks all game, but still won.
 
That grounder in the ninth looked like Tulo.
his glove position and how he saw the ball right into his glove was really good, all while moving forward so his momentum would make the throw easier, it was textbook. nothing about bo early last year was textbook lol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad