evnted
Registered User
- Apr 14, 2016
- 816
- 2,026
been ages since ive chatted on hfboards but figured no better time than now to try to get back into it (ive been lurking on here and the prospects board for a while so i guess ive been a bit of a parasocial member lol). in any case, ive very much appreciated all the prospect chat from everyone and im looking forward to being able to contribute to it again.
on the topic of jiricek, im at this weird position of knowing how much we need a player of his style, while also feeling a bit apprehensive about adding that particular style. his shot, physicality, and one-on-one shutdown ability are just fantastic as have been praised time and time again, but theres a few areas of his game that i could see being problematic long term. i think his general, non-puck carrier defensive zone coverage could be a bit more purposeful, i think he needs to work more on stabilizing his risk taking at the opponents blueline since he can certainly get turned around if he messes up (especially so if the puck carrier opts for a pass rather than trying to skate past him), and i think im echoing a sentiment from a couple other posters from a while ago that his pass execution (and to a lesser degree decision making) sometimes seems haphazard, despite him clearly being an intelligent player with great puck handling abilities.
i do want to reiterate just how valuable i think he could be for us, i just think my concern right now is he winds up being a little bit of a live by the sword, die by the sword player since he seems like he always wants to make a big play; he could launch a bomb from the point to win a game, and he could also take a corner battle too far and put us down a man in a key scenario. part of what i wonder is whether or not this is simply the price you pay to land a player like jiricek, which is definitely hard to argue against. i would love to be in on our interviews with him because if there were any sort of discussion about dialing him back juuuuust a smidge, i think you get a really impactful defender with a more consistently productive intensity to his game
on the topic of jiricek, im at this weird position of knowing how much we need a player of his style, while also feeling a bit apprehensive about adding that particular style. his shot, physicality, and one-on-one shutdown ability are just fantastic as have been praised time and time again, but theres a few areas of his game that i could see being problematic long term. i think his general, non-puck carrier defensive zone coverage could be a bit more purposeful, i think he needs to work more on stabilizing his risk taking at the opponents blueline since he can certainly get turned around if he messes up (especially so if the puck carrier opts for a pass rather than trying to skate past him), and i think im echoing a sentiment from a couple other posters from a while ago that his pass execution (and to a lesser degree decision making) sometimes seems haphazard, despite him clearly being an intelligent player with great puck handling abilities.
i do want to reiterate just how valuable i think he could be for us, i just think my concern right now is he winds up being a little bit of a live by the sword, die by the sword player since he seems like he always wants to make a big play; he could launch a bomb from the point to win a game, and he could also take a corner battle too far and put us down a man in a key scenario. part of what i wonder is whether or not this is simply the price you pay to land a player like jiricek, which is definitely hard to argue against. i would love to be in on our interviews with him because if there were any sort of discussion about dialing him back juuuuust a smidge, i think you get a really impactful defender with a more consistently productive intensity to his game