Prospect Info: 2022 Draft: #11 - Conor Geekie, C

SirLancelot

Registered User
Aug 9, 2022
20
23


Watch this clip. I started it at the 2 minute mark, you only need to watch for about a minute or so to see his skating is not that bad, just needs to learn the first quick steps/explosiveness

I said it when we drafted him. If he pans out, I expect a less defensive, more offensive and equally physical version of a healthy Martin Hanzal.

just needs to "learn explosiveness". You dont learn that. You can build on what you have but it's tough to overcome skating. And that's not his only problem in that area. His edge work is suspect.
He's the type of junior player that makes me the most nervous. A big kid who bowled over all the skinny kids in junior.
Of course there's those that pull out the Robitaille's of yesteryear. Even Dino Ciccarelli. But the game was so much slower back then..
In today's game you have some slower guys but they have elite hands and other attributes like Mark Stone. Still he's so RARE.
If you're slower you better have great hockey sense (I.Q.)

Not if you're willing to really work with a skating coach. They can make meaningful improvements. For a power forward or big center agility to me is much more important than top end speed. I don't expect Geekie to be leading the rush. His game is size and strength. One can teach skating but one cannot teach size.
See Jesperi Kotkaniemi formerly of MOntreal. Never really improved his skating cause his starting point was so bad.
So yea the answer is always "skating coach" but at this level it can only improve so much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jakey53

RABBIT

AKA Turd Ferguson
just needs to "learn explosiveness". You dont learn that. You can build on what you have but it's tough to overcome skating. And that's not his only problem in that area. His edge work is suspect.
He's the type of junior player that makes me the most nervous. A big kid who bowled over all the skinny kids in junior.
Of course there's those that pull out the Robitaille's of yesteryear. Even Dino Ciccarelli. But the game was so much slower back then..
In today's game you have some slower guys but they have elite hands and other attributes like Mark Stone. Still he's so RARE.
If you're slower you better have great hockey sense (I.Q.)


See Jesperi Kotkaniemi formerly of MOntreal. Never really improved his skating cause his starting point was so bad.
So yea the answer is always "skating coach" but at this level it can only improve so much.
I respectfully disagree with the bolded. Track athletes learn to train themselves on the importance of their first two steps all the time. Explosiveness can be learned/honed by improved leg/core strength and mind to muscle training with focus on foot placement. Power skating coaches (likely) focus on this.
 

MIGs Dog

Registered User
Jan 3, 2012
14,692
12,734
I respectfully disagree with the bolded. Track athletes learn to train themselves on the importance of their first two steps all the time. Explosiveness can be learned/honed by improved leg/core strength and mind to muscle training with focus on foot placement. Power skating coaches (likely) focus on this.

Agree. Same applies to lineman in football. Big, strong, and even fast are not enough. It's about explosiveness off the snap and footwork, which can be developed. Watch the movie "Greater" for Hollywood's depiction of a true story.
 

Jakey53

Registered User
Aug 27, 2011
30,740
9,575
I respectfully disagree with the bolded. Track athletes learn to train themselves on the importance of their first two steps all the time. Explosiveness can be learned/honed by improved leg/core strength and mind to muscle training with focus on foot placement. Power skating coaches (likely) focus on this.
True, but if you are a turtle you will turn into a fast turtle. No matter what power skating coach coached Strome and the like, they can only do so much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SirLancelot

Vinny Boombatz

formerly ctwin22
Mar 21, 2008
11,217
6,962
Chandler, AZ
No offense, but Geekie actually seems like an athlete, who looks fast running around the bases playing baseball. I'm sure there wasn't anything Strome was fast at.

Geekie looks like he could be fast...with the right training.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bonsai Tree

rt

Clean Hits on Substack
just needs to "learn explosiveness". You dont learn that. You can build on what you have but it's tough to overcome skating. And that's not his only problem in that area. His edge work is suspect.
He's the type of junior player that makes me the most nervous. A big kid who bowled over all the skinny kids in junior.
Of course there's those that pull out the Robitaille's of yesteryear. Even Dino Ciccarelli. But the game was so much slower back then..
In today's game you have some slower guys but they have elite hands and other attributes like Mark Stone. Still he's so RARE.
If you're slower you better have great hockey sense (I.Q.)


See Jesperi Kotkaniemi formerly of MOntreal. Never really improved his skating cause his starting point was so bad.
So yea the answer is always "skating coach" but at this level it can only improve so much.
I watched a lot of Geekie in WHL games this season. He’s a fantastic skater for his size when he feels like it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hbk

SirLancelot

Registered User
Aug 9, 2022
20
23
I respectfully disagree with the bolded. Track athletes learn to train themselves on the importance of their first two steps all the time. Explosiveness can be learned/honed by improved leg/core strength and mind to muscle training with focus on foot placement. Power skating coaches (likely) focus on this.
He's an elite prospect. He's been getting coaching an an elite level. If he hasnt already worked on a clear weakness then it would show he's getting bad advice or just doesnt care. (I severely doubt both scenario's)
I've seen this argument so many times, and it just doesnt work like that.
Like Jakey says, he's a slow turtle, pro teaching will get him to the faster turtle level.
That being said it doesnt mean he cant make it. You need bigger power type players in this game. It's gotten IMO to much of an emphasis on speed and given room for really small guys to flourish. It will continue to be like this but there's always room for a bigger stronger guy. Just look at the Stanley cup final and the playoffs in general , you have to have guys that are big and strong.

I watched a lot of Geekie in WHL games this season. He’s a fantastic skater for his size when he feels like it.
I dont believe a word of that. Being a fantastic skater is not mental.
 

SirLancelot

Registered User
Aug 9, 2022
20
23
True, but if you are a turtle you will turn into a fast turtle. No matter what power skating coach coached Strome and the like, they can only do so much.
Strome is a great example like KK. When you're that bad you cant be coached up.
But unlike those guys this kid has the physical attributes that every team needs. We need big strong grinders with skills. It will be interesting watching him. It's going to take him YEARS to make an impact if he ever does. These bigger guys with skating issues are a slow burn in development.
 

Mangosteen

Ground hog day no more
Apr 9, 2018
1,526
1,135
Still not as sold on Geekie as some. RT and hbk, do you have a recommended highlight or certain games I should watch? He looks like a goodish or above average prospect. Do you guys think he could be 2nd line or third line grinder?

Really like his personality and interviews.
 

Grimes

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 5, 2012
8,680
5,202
Tippet's Doghouse
cleanhits.substack.com
YUP.

It is a big gamble to have drafted Geekie. Very Strome 2.0.

Trusting the amazing scouting staff though. :crossfing

Some days I wish we went with the safer pick, other days I'm thrilled we made this pick.

If we didn't have a top 3 pick and this was our only selection I would have been very disappointed. If we moved Chychrun for a top 12 pick and selected Geekie with it I would have been pretty disappointed. But the fact that we consolidated our stockpile of picks to draft a kid with a tremendous ceiling (even the floor is outright bust) will let me be patient with the selection, and not too upset if he doesn't reach his ceiling.

As long as he is a regular NHL'er I feel he will always hold value around the league. I also think he has a better shot at becoming a solid 3C than an outright bust. I think he has a better shot at becoming a solid 2C than a true 1C. I don't think we will know if he is on a 2C or 3C trajectory until he plays some NHL games. We should know if he is an outright bust if he can't produce in the AHL (like Ryan McInnis for example).

TLDR
Turns into outright bust/Ryan McInnis 2.0 = 10%
Turns into at least a solid 3C = 45%
Turns into at least a solid 2C = 35%
Turns into a solid 1C/Sean Couturier 2.0 = 10%
 

Jagged Ice

Registered User
Jul 10, 2011
3,326
2,878
Central Phoenix
Since we drafted Cooley and we'll draft another C early in '23, I was hoping for Miroshnichenko. A big power forward sniper would have been a nice addition to the forward core. Otherwise Mateychuk if we wanted a safe d-man in that 10-15 range. I trust our scouts made the right call with Geekie.
 

Grimes

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 5, 2012
8,680
5,202
Tippet's Doghouse
cleanhits.substack.com
Since we drafted Cooley and we'll draft another C early in '23, I was hoping for Miroshnichenko. A big power forward sniper would have been a nice addition to the forward core. Otherwise Mateychuk if we wanted a safe d-man in that 10-15 range. I trust our scouts made the right call with Geekie.

I do like the fact that we added size with Geekie in case we are lucky enough to draft Bedard (we will) or if Benson really becomes a riser and is BPA. Also helps mitigate Cooley and Keller's size a bit.
 

hbk

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
23,128
9,818
Visit site
Still not as sold on Geekie as some. RT and hbk, do you have a recommended highlight or certain games I should watch? He looks like a goodish or above average prospect. Do you guys think he could be 2nd line or third line grinder?

Really like his personality and interviews.
I think CHLTV still has the playoffs available to watch for WHL. Moose Jaw series worth the time because u can also watch Bensen and Yaeger.
 

rt

Clean Hits on Substack
Still not as sold on Geekie as some. RT and hbk, do you have a recommended highlight or certain games I should watch? He looks like a goodish or above average prospect. Do you guys think he could be 2nd line or third line grinder?

Really like his personality and interviews.
I don’t remember specific games, sorry. Some games he looked like prime Eric Lindros. Other games he looked like Dylan Strome on Xanax. It’s not like there was a steady progression or he fell off a cliff. It was random. Just no consistency of any kind.

He was my 11th ranked player in the draft and the only guy we passed on that I had higher was Mateychuk. Who I had all of one spot higher. And who I only put ahead of Geekie very near the draft.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad