Wow name calling!
You obviously didn’t like my post!
Or
Do not like to be told the truth! / Do not like to hear any point of view other than your own.
I did not like your post, preceding mine and that’s why I pointed out the ignorance of your statement. (Basically agreeing with what you said…..that “ you don’t know”.
Simple math!
I think that SamBerg > Heinola
You made a statement basically saying that it is inconceivable to you that anyone would or could think that.
However,
Vote 2 of our prospect list had just occurred and 38% said that Heinola is the better prospect.
-30% had voted that Samberg was the better prospect.
close race….. but it’s inconceivable to you that anybody could think Samberg is a better than Heinola.
Your post was negative towards anybody that had a different opinion than yours.
You said “you do not know how”
This is How…..
Samberg is a big strong defensive defence man the kind of defence man that wins you playoff series. In the mold of Peece and Slavin from Carolina. The kind of defence man you need to win games when it matters.
Heinola is a slight European that is good offensively but easily knocked off the puck and is a liability in his own end.In the mold of Enstrom /Sami Niku/Christian Ehrhoff. good for points in the regular season but also more likely to lose you the game in triple overtime in the playoffs.
Well that was unnecessarily douchey.
The above post was in reply to this post.