riznat
Registered User
It's crazy that Jack Eichel gravitated to hockey and not modeling
As leader and only member of the vilardi fan club (Anaheim ducks chapter), we support this msg.This is the season Vilardi turns into Frolov and I'm pumped for it.
Which only makes having 5 rhd on the big club more problematic.Barring injury, he'll get 40+ games this season. Only needs 33 more after tonight to reach 1000
Fo sho, simple as thatForwards don’t look bad but the defense looks rusty.
Yeah but those years were some of the worst for the Kings franchise. I'd like a player who can put up those numbers on a winning team. When it really matters. Frolov was way too passive.Multiple 30 goal seasons and even 70 point seasons?
Nah you guys just criminally underrate Fro.
Jack Eichel looks like one of those dudes from the old western films who betrays the protagonist for some gold
My man Edlers age already lapped him a few times. Word around the locker room is that he says he can now tell when it’s going to rain because his joints ache.
Mr Ed might be ready for the glue factory. He has a NMC so he cant be waived...We are really hurtin on the left sideI don't know if Edler is going to be able to cut it for the Kings this season. He was really an unsung hero last season, but at 36 he is probably at best teeing off on 18.
I think he makes a great #7 d-man, but if the Kings are going to reach a ceiling they probably need Clarke to be in that spot. Assuming they don't trade for someone.
He was part of the early rebuild and peaked far too soon. He literally had one of the weirdest trajectories I’ve seen from an NHL player..Yeah but those years were some of the worst for the Kings franchise. I'd like a player who can put up those numbers on a winning team. When it really matters. Frolov was way too passive.
That's a terrible argument.Yeah but those years were some of the worst for the Kings franchise. I'd like a player who can put up those numbers on a winning team. When it really matters. Frolov was way too passive.
Zero surprise.Lowest time on ice for the Kings? Quinton Byfield, 3:46. Only Amadio has less on the Vegas side.
Also, for those wanting to keep track.
Kopitar - 6:09
Kempe
Arvidsson
Danault
Moore
Fiala
Kaliyev
Iafallo
Grundstrom
Vilardi
Lizotte
Byfield - 3:46
Time on ice among the forwards. Kopitar led all forwards with 6:09, and Byfield had the least with 3:46. The only skater on either team to have less time than Byfield is Mike Amadio.
Also, for those wanting to keep track.
Kopitar - 6:09
Kempe
Arvidsson
Danault
Moore
Fiala
Kaliyev
Iafallo
Grundstrom
Vilardi
Lizotte
Byfield - 3:46
Time on ice among the forwards. Kopitar led all forwards with 6:09, and Byfield had the least with 3:46. The only skater on either team to have less time than Byfield is Mike Amadio.
No comparison to Suzuki. He is on a rebuilding Canadiens. Frolov was on crappy Kings teams and put up points, but what did it all mean? Nothing. Frolov was good, don't get me wrong, but I'd hope for more for Vilardi than prime Frolov.That's a terrible argument.
That's like trying to say Nick Suzuki is a meh player because he played on the last place team in the NHL. The numbers Fro put up are pretty incredible considering he played a lot with Derek Armstrong, Michael Handzus, and Craig Conroy.
I really hope you're kiddingWhere can you get icetime logs?