The review is due to the injury, allowing them to confirm the double minor. Which is fine, but my understanding of the high stick rule is that you are responsible for your stick at all times, even when taking contact.What rule is it, that lets you review just high sticking? Never heard of it
Fiala & Kopitar are like oil and water; one thriving on fast paced instinctive plays, one playing a game of attrition and calculated plays.Fiala needs to be back to number one line already
Yeah, the only mention in the rule that negates it would be a follow through. Lifting the stick is certainly not that. Seems like bull to me and I doubt we ever see that again.The review is due to the injury, allowing them to confirm the double minor. Which is fine, but my understanding of the high stick rule is that you are responsible for your stick at all times, even when taking contact.
Jim read the rule.. and it strictly to determine whose stick it is.. it was still his stick even though Kings player lifted it. so if you want to be technical, he was hit by a hawks stick... penalty should have countedThe review is due to the injury, allowing them to confirm the double minor. Which is fine, but my understanding of the high stick rule is that you are responsible for your stick at all times, even when taking contact.
That third string goalie is better than Petersen at 1/15th the cost.Kings are making the third string goalie look good.