If the issues were so predictable, why did nobody predict them? We had a poll for how the Blues finish the season (
Thread link). Nobody voted for them to miss the playoffs. 59 votes, nobody voted they'd miss the playoffs. Only 10 people voted they would lose in the first. You voted they'd lose in the finals. So how predictable was it they would be this bad?
I'm not calling you out specifically, well I am, but only because your post made me decide to point it out. This is something a lot of people are saying now, that it was predictable. But I do not recall anyone saying we'd be that bad before we were that bad. So how was it predictable? I have been harping on our defensive issues and the loss of Perron, and I didn't predict we'd be this bad. I voted we'd lose in the first round, not that we'd get a top 10 pick. I don't think it was predictable at all. There is something going on beyond our on paper/predictable issues.