2022-2023 Blues Multi-Purpose Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

bleedblue1223

Registered User
Jan 21, 2011
52,932
16,382
I've always found cognitive dissonance in the definition where there may be 15 (or some number other than 32) #1 defensemen in the league. I don't think that's a #1D. I think that needs a different term. "Anchor defenseman" or something. Its similar when people are trying to talk about '#1 Centers'.

So much arguing on this board stems from people not getting their definitions square before starting the discussion, and a neutral observer can see that they simply are using terms with different definitions.
That's fine, that's why I'd prefer the discussion to come to some sort of agreement on definitions. Instead of arguing what Faulk is or isn't, can we at least determine if we agree on what it is.

It brings back the memories of discussing if Backes was a #1 or not, and I think we ultimately learned the difference between him and a real #1 in O'Reilly.

In general I think most people consider #1 centers and defensemen to be those that can be a #1 on a true contending Cup team. If you want that to be a different label, that's fine with me, ultimately each side just has to agree on definitions and labels before a debate with them applied to specific players.
 

Majorityof1

Registered User
Mar 6, 2014
8,939
7,839
Central Florida
Is the 32nd best goaltender in the league a "#1 goaltender"? Would you be comfortable with James Reimer as our starter? He is a top 32 goalie in the league by save percentage (more than 6 games).
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Stealth JD

joe galiba

Registered User
Apr 16, 2020
2,188
2,455
Is the 32nd best goaltender in the league a "#1 goaltender"? Would you be comfortable with James Reimer as our starter? He is a top 32 goalie in the league by save percentage (more than 6 games).
6 defenseman play/every goalie, so that would equate him to the 192nd best defenseman
 

Mike Liut

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 12, 2008
19,932
9,465
Mikkola, Barbs and Acciari need to be re-signed. They all play the Blues/Berube style of hockey. We’d be kitty kay soft without those 3. Schenn can’t bring all the physicality by himself.


Kitty cat. Not kitty Kay. Typo.
 

Majorityof1

Registered User
Mar 6, 2014
8,939
7,839
Central Florida
6 defenseman play/every goalie, so that would equate him to the 192nd best defenseman

We are talking terminology. The most a team can have is 1 #1 defenseman and 1 #1 goaltender. That is a 1 to 1 ratio. People are saying every team has to have a #1 defenseman so there should be 32 #1 defenseman. Well every team has a #1 goaltender so there should be 32 #1 goaltenders by that logic. However there are not enough good-enough goalies for every team to have a guy they are absolutely confident in the role. Just like there are not enough good-enough Defenseman for there to be 32 #1 quality guys.
 

HighNote

Just one more Cup
Jul 1, 2014
3,423
4,339
St. Louis
I've seen people use 3 different definitions to describe what a #1 is:

1. The best player at X position for each team is a #1. This one doesn't make sense because of Malkin. You can say "Crosby is the Penguins' #1 center and Malkin is their #2," but you can't say "Malkin is A #2 center." He'd be the #1 on probably 28 other teams.

2. There are 32 teams, so there are 32 #1s available, but not every team has one. This one makes a little more sense, but still misses the mark. The number of teams in the league is relevant, but it's not THE factor at this point in the league's life. When the league went from 6 teams to 12, that was a significant factor, because suddenly there were twice as many players in the league. If you suddenly took out 26 teams and had a 6 team league again, Faulk is a #4 defenseman because there's roughly 15-20 better guys in the league. So adding 1 team or taking away 1 team right now doesn't have a huge bearing on where a player ranks because you're only adding ~50 guys to the league. So if a 33rd team was added next year, there isn't suddenly going to be 33 #1s instead of 32 (although there could be, it just wouldn't be solely because of the number of teams).

3. It's a mixture of the size of the league and the amount of talent in the league at X position. I think this is the best way to go about it. You're comparing X player to the rest of the league at that position. So the shear number of players at that position is A factor and the overall skill level of that position is A factor. It's all relative to the rest of the league. For example, I can remember back when I had much more time on my hands and I was in several fantasy leagues every year. There was a time period where there was a clear gap in the league between overall skill level of left wingers and right wingers. Right wing was deeper. If during the draft you were torn between taking 2 players and one was a LW and the other was a RW, you took the LW because there'd be solid RW options later in the draft but there wouldn't be for LW.

So based on the number of teams and the amount of talent at defense, there's probably only 15-20 clear-cut #1 defenseman. Faulk is right on the border in my opinion, since he's been the center of discussion here. Some nights he takes over the game, but most nights he's just a top pairing guy playing solid in all zones, but he's never really worse than that. Overall he's an extremely valuable player to have.

Just my two cents.
 

Mike Liut

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 12, 2008
19,932
9,465
Mikkola, Barbs and Acciari need to be re-signed. They all play the Blues/Berube style of hockey. We’d be kitty kay soft without those 3. Schenn can’t bring all the physicality by himself.


Who’s this waltpodubney clown? Never says a word, just laughs at posts. Friggen weirdo
 

bleedblue1223

Registered User
Jan 21, 2011
52,932
16,382
Tarasenko is going to be with Saad and RoR when he returns.
Makes sense to keep Kyrou with Thomas, but it really just highlights our issue of we have 2 RWs that really only ideally work with Thomas. Kyrou does work decently with Schenn though. Hopefully Tarasenko works with ROR, but it didn't in the past.
 

ChicagoBlues

Terraformers
Oct 24, 2006
15,756
6,618
That's fine, that's why I'd prefer the discussion to come to some sort of agreement on definitions. Instead of arguing what Faulk is or isn't, can we at least determine if we agree on what it is.

It brings back the memories of discussing if Backes was a #1 or not, and I think we ultimately learned the difference between him and a real #1 in O'Reilly.

In general I think most people consider #1 centers and defensemen to be those that can be a #1 on a true contending Cup team. If you want that to be a different label, that's fine with me, ultimately each side just has to agree on definitions and labels before a debate with them applied to specific players.
This is exactly what I think we need to do.

There is no such thing as "objective truth"; only agreements.
 

ChicagoBlues

Terraformers
Oct 24, 2006
15,756
6,618
I just realized that I haven’t noticed any skating issues with Tucker (one if his presumed weaknesses). He impressed in that I think may be viable bottom pair d-man next year (full-time).
And there were a few times in the last game that his skating looked well above average. Definitely a surprise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vladys Gumption

Celtic Note

Living the dream
Dec 22, 2006
17,341
6,310
To me Faulk has increased his value to our team over the years. He is the top defenseman on our team in overall contribution. He is a first pairing talent.

I don’t see him as a number one on a Cup contender unless he has three other very high end top 4 D to compliment him. Our D is not at that level. We basically need another D the caliber of Faulk or Parayko to complete the 4.
 

Xerloris

reckless optimism
Jun 9, 2015
7,644
8,257
St.Louis
And there were a few times in the last game that his skating looked well above average. Definitely a surprise.

I was pleasantly surprised in Tucker. I kind of want to see him here as a regular until it's proven he can't handle it. If only I didn't love Bortz so much.

To me Faulk has increased his value to our team over the years. He is the top defenseman on our team in overall contribution. He is a first pairing talent.

I don’t see him as a number one on a Cup contender unless he has three other very high end top 4 D to compliment him. Our D is not at that level. We basically need another D the caliber of Faulk or Parayko to complete the 4.

That's nothing surprising. Even with Pietrangelo he had Jbo and Parayko. Throw in someone like Chycrun and our D is probably good for a run, especially with leddy still in the mix.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChicagoBlues

Linkens Mastery

Conductor of the TankTown Express
Jan 15, 2014
20,295
17,939
Hyrule
I was pleasantly surprised in Tucker. I kind of want to see him here as a regular until it's proven he can't handle it. If only I didn't love Bortz so much.



That's nothing surprising. Even with Pietrangelo he had Jbo and Parayko. Throw in someone like Chycrun and our D is probably good for a run, especially with leddy still in the mix.
Until Chychrun stubs his toe and he is injured for another 5 months
 

BlueDream

Registered User
Aug 30, 2011
26,201
15,092
So now that Acciari has rightfully been moved up to the 3rd line, let’s highlight how absolutely useless the rest of our 4th liners are. Once again.

Toropchenko, Pitlick, Walker and Alexandrov have a combined 4 points in a total 44 games among them. So they are all averaging 1 point this season.

Our PK is ranked 30th in the league. And only one of those above players is among our top 6 forwards in short-handed ice time. The rest are not used on the PK.

What exactly do these guys provide? They bring nothing to the team, and it sure would be nice if our depth guys could actually impact the game so we didn’t have to use top players like ROR, Buchnevich and Thomas so much short handed.

Turns out that signing a bunch of scrubs to $750K deals this summer didn’t work because we have the listed production above out of half of them, and the other half we signed are in the AHL.

Sick depth.
 

Majorityof1

Registered User
Mar 6, 2014
8,939
7,839
Central Florida
So now that Acciari has rightfully been moved up to the 3rd line, let’s highlight how absolutely useless the rest of our 4th liners are. Once again.

Toropchenko, Pitlick, Walker and Alexandrov have a combined 4 points in a total 44 games among them. So they are all averaging 1 point this season.

Our PK is ranked 30th in the league. And only one of those above players is among our top 6 forwards in short-handed ice time. The rest are not used on the PK.

What exactly do these guys provide? They bring nothing to the team, and it sure would be nice if our depth guys could actually impact the game so we didn’t have to use top players like ROR, Buchnevich and Thomas so much short handed.

Turns out that signing a bunch of scrubs to $750K deals this summer didn’t work because we have the listed production above out of half of them, and the other half we signed are in the AHL.

Sick depth.

How many 4th liners PK or produce significant points? I ask in earnest as I am not sure. We have been fortunate in the past with having guys like Barbashev and Sunqvist on our 4th line. But I'd assume a lot of teams have 4th liners much like ours. I don't think many PK or put up bunches of points. Maybe 20 guys league wide are play 10ish minutes and either are great on the PK or put up 20+ points.

Last year only 11 guys with an ATOI around what are guys are getting (11 minutes or less) scored 15 points or more. Only 3 had more than 20. Looking at PK minutes when sorting by total TOI/gm is a bit more difficult than I want to tackle right now.

Plus are guys are playing decent defense, at least by the results. Those 4 are the 4 lowest GA/60 for the team this year. Alexandrov has yet to be scored in 9 games and 75 minutes (knock on wood). There is value in being able to put guys out there and just kill time if your top 9 is scoring (which ours is not). You can rest your top 9 and not worry about the lead changing.

I'm not really arguing that these guys shouldn't be better. But we went out and got the best that was available for the very little money we had to spend. i don't think we should be vilifying the guys making $750k. We need to vilify the guys making the multiple millions that took up all the cap so we could only afford $750k NHL/AHL tweeners, or the GM who gave out those contracts (which to be fair might be what you were doing),

Also having good players in the AHL does help. Its good to give our young guys decent players to play with and create a winning culture. That might not be working perfectly right now (Tbirds are .500) but Frk and Highmore are the 2 leading point producers. They'd be much worse without them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vladys Gumption

BlueDream

Registered User
Aug 30, 2011
26,201
15,092
How many 4th liners PK or produce significant points? I ask in earnest as I am not sure. We have been fortunate in the past with having guys like Barbashev and Sunqvist on our 4th line. But I'd assume a lot of teams have 4th liners much like ours. I don't think many PK or put up bunches of points. Maybe 20 guys league wide are play 10ish minutes and either are great on the PK or put up 20+ points.

Last year only 11 guys with an ATOI around what are guys are getting (11 minutes or less) scored 15 points or more. Only 3 had more than 20. Looking at PK minutes when sorting by total TOI/gm is a bit more difficult than I want to tackle right now.

Plus are guys are playing decent defense, at least by the results. Those 4 are the 4 lowest GA/60 for the team this year. Alexandrov has yet to be scored in 9 games and 75 minutes (knock on wood). There is value in being able to put guys out there and just kill time if your top 9 is scoring (which ours is not). You can rest your top 9 and not worry about the lead changing.

I'm not really arguing that these guys shouldn't be better. But we went out and got the best that was available for the very little money we had to spend. i don't think we should be vilifying the guys making $750k. We need to vilify the guys making the multiple millions that took up all the cap so we could only afford $750k NHL/AHL tweeners, or the GM who gave out those contracts (which to be fair might be what you were doing),

Also having good players in the AHL does help. Its good to give our young guys decent players to play with and create a winning culture. That might not be working perfectly right now (Tbirds are .500) but Frk and Highmore are the 2 leading point producers. They'd be much worse without them.
We can increase this even more to include Logan Brown, Josh Leivo and Jake Neighbours (even though he's no longer here). Because those three along with Walker, Toropchenko, Alexandrov and Pitlick are the 7 forwards with the least amount of ice time on the team before you get to our top 9 guys.

Of those 7, in a combined 70 games played they have 9 points. And half of those (4) are just from Leivo.

Of those players, Toropchenko is the only one who has gotten any type of valuable PK time (at least 30 seconds per game) and he ranks 220th in the league among forwards in that. That means each team, on average, has at least 6 forwards getting more PK time than he does. That means 3 full units for each team, before you get to Toropchenko. And of those 3 units per team, in looking at the list I am confident each team has 2-3 4th liners that are among that group.

I subscribe to the idea that a good 4th liner should be producing ~15 points per season. Anything that's 20+ is really good, but 15 is solid production for them. We have nobody even close to that pace right now.

In looking at the good teams around the NHL right now and their 4th lines, they are getting that production. I'll look at the 5-7 forwards that are getting the least amount of ice time for their teams to compare. These guys will all be at ~13 mins or below, just like the Blues' guys. Anyone at 14+ minutes is disqualified from these lists.

Boston: Nosek, Foligno, Smith, Frederic, Greer and Lauko. In 91 combined games they have a total of 35 points.

Vegas: Amadio, Lechyshyn, Kessel, Kolesar, Howden, Cotter and Carrier. 108 games, 30 points.

Carolina: Noesen, Stastny, Drury, Stepan, Martinook. 85 games, 21 points.

Tampa Bay: Maroon, Bellemare, Perry, Koepke, Colton, Namestnikov, Balcers. 111 games, 26 points.

New Jersey: Zetterlund, Holtz, McLeod, Wood, Boqvist. 73 games, 33 points.

Dallas: Gurianov, Glendening, Faksa, Blumel, Kiviranta. 79 games, 17 points. This is the only example who has weak production, but 3 of these guys average 2+ mins per game on the PK. And Dallas' PK is the 4th best in the NHL.

Islanders: Cizikas, Clutterbuck, Martin, Johnston, Soshnikov, Wahlstrom. 87 games, 24 points.

Toronto: Malgin, Clifford, Jarnkrok, Robertson, Holmberg, Aston-Reese, Engvall. 95 games, 25 points.

The ice times are all pretty similar. You could DOUBLE the Blues players' games and they would still be behind all of those teams by a good margin.

We have talked ad nauseam about our top guys. But ROR, Kyrou, Schenn, Thomas, Buch etc have picked up their play and are all playing much better lately. The thing that has stayed the same is our bottom of the lineup guys don't give us anything, and I believe that's a big factor for why this team is so inconsistent and just doesn't have it a lot of nights. We are a team that is supposed to be built on depth. That's going to be hard to win when we only have 3 good lines. Any team that has 4 good lines is beating us in a playoff series. I guess I'm just frustrated that we are trying the same thing we did last year, and are getting the same results. Actually, worse results. I too want Springfield to be good but the guys we have aren't cutting it IMO. I don't think I'm asking for a lot here, I just want some bottom of the lineup guys that average more than 1 point this season, and/or could kill a penalty now and then. Right now we don't have that. All the other good teams do.
 
Last edited:

Bye Bye Blueston

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 4, 2016
19,853
21,146
Elsewhere
We can increase this even more to include Logan Brown, Josh Leivo and Jake Neighbours (even though he's no longer here). Because those three along with Walker, Toropchenko, Alexandrov and Pitlick are the 7 forwards with the least amount of ice time on the team before you get to our top 9 guys.

Of those 7, in a combined 70 games played they have 9 points. And half of those (4) are just from Leivo.

Of those players, Toropchenko is the only one who has gotten any type of valuable PK time (at least 30 seconds per game) and he ranks 220th in the league among forwards in that. That means each team, on average, has at least 6 forwards getting more PK time than he does. That means 3 full units for each team, before you get to Toropchenko. And of those 3 units per team, in looking at the list I am confident each team has 2-3 4th liners that are among that group.

I subscribe to the idea that a good 4th liner should be producing ~15 points per season. Anything that's 20+ is really good, but 15 is solid production for them. We have nobody even close to that pace right now.

In looking at the good teams around the NHL right now and their 4th lines, they are getting that production. I'll look at the 5-7 forwards that are getting the least amount of ice time for their teams to compare. These guys will all be at ~13 mins or below, just like the Blues' guys. Anyone at 14+ minutes is disqualified from these lists.

Boston: Nosek, Foligno, Smith, Frederic, Greer and Lauko. In 91 combined games they have a total of 35 points.

Vegas: Amadio, Lechyshyn, Kessel, Kolesar, Howden, Cotter and Carrier. 108 games, 30 points.

Carolina: Noesen, Stastny, Drury, Stepan, Martinook. 85 games, 21 points.

Tampa Bay: Maroon, Bellemare, Perry, Koepke, Colton, Namestnikov, Balcers. 111 games, 26 points.

New Jersey: Zetterlund, Holtz, McLeod, Wood, Boqvist. 73 games, 33 points.

Dallas: Gurianov, Glendening, Faksa, Blumel, Kiviranta. 79 games, 17 points. This is the only example who has weak production, but 3 of these guys average 2+ mins per game on the PK. And Dallas' PK is the 4th best in the NHL.

Islanders: Cizikas, Clutterbuck, Martin, Johnston, Soshnikov, Wahlstrom. 87 games, 24 points.

Toronto: Malgin, Clifford, Jarnkrok, Robertson, Holmberg, Aston-Reese, Engvall. 95 games, 25 points.

The ice times are all pretty similar. You could DOUBLE the Blues players' games and they would still be behind all of those teams by a good margin.

We have talked ad nauseam about our top guys. But ROR, Kyrou, Schenn, Thomas, Buch etc have picked up their play and are all playing much better lately. The thing that has stayed the same is our bottom of the lineup guys don't give us anything, and I believe that's a big factor for why this team is so inconsistent and just doesn't have it a lot of nights. We are a team that is supposed to be built on depth. That's going to be hard to win when we only have 3 good lines. Any team that has 4 good lines is beating us in a playoff series. I guess I'm just frustrated that we are trying the same thing we did last year, and are getting the same results. Actually, worse results. I too want Springfield to be good but the guys we have aren't cutting it IMO. I don't think I'm asking for a lot here, I just want some bottom of the lineup guys that average more than 1 point this season, and/or could kill a penalty now and then. Right now we don't have that. All the other good teams do.
This seems a bit unfair when our guys are basically all making close to minimum and the teams you list have guys making 2-3mm and more among listed players. Our problem seems to me that for a team that likes to think of itself as having 3 first lines, we have none producing at that rate. How many guys do we actually have playing like top 6 players? 3 or 4? “Death by a thousand cuts” can look like “dieing because your 900 cuts couldn’t kill the other guy” pretty easily.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Majorityof1
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad