Value of: 2022 #1 overall if Devils win draft lottery

Setec Astronomy

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
2,626
1,786
The consensus number 1 overall is a non-generational center, a position the Devils are set at for the next decade. The Devils score a lot of goals as is, and have a top five prospect pipeline.

I could see them trading the pick for Spencer Knight and something else or Askarov, depending on what the political situation with Russia (NOT INVITING COMMENTS ABOUT UKRAINE) is by draft day. I imagine this would work for the Panthers/Predators.

If not a goalie, I could see the Fitzgerald agreeing to trade the pick for Brady Tkachuk or Matthew Tkachuk (if a long term deal were worked out ahead of time).

As it stands now, it’s a distinct possibility the Devils end up with the pick. Interested to see what fans of other teams would be willing to trade for it.
 

Setec Astronomy

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
2,626
1,786
Ottawa won't be trading Brady. That we know for sure.

Don’t intend to get into a pissing match, but I think Shane Wright is about even value for a winger on a fairly pricey contract who is comfortably leas than a PPG player. I can’t speak to the optics of it from an Ottawa standpoint though.
 

Nac Mac Feegle

wee & free
Jun 10, 2011
35,398
9,817
Don’t intend to get into a pissing match, but I think Shane Wright is about even value for a winger on a fairly pricey contract who is comfortably leas than a PPG player. I can’t speak to the optics of it from an Ottawa standpoint though.

It isn't necessarily about value on paper. Brady is the captain, fan favorite, and heart & soul of the team. The marketing of the team locally revolves around the kid and his personality. Even the team is being built based on his style of play.

Wright will likely be the better player, but that doesn't really factor into this particular equation for Ottawa.
 

captainpaxil

Registered User
Dec 2, 2008
4,727
1,245
The thing with this year's draft is there's a clear top 5 and then a second group that runs to the high teens. Dropping into that second group might be an option for some teams who land in that top 5. I don't see much room to wiggle inside though.
Philly jersey ottowa Chicago Montreal Arizona and Seattle depending how they rank out is going to leave some bad teams on the wrong side of the talent dropoff.
Unless someone absolutely loves nemec or slafkivsky is radioactive I don't know that first overall nets you more than 4th. Being on the outside looking in might burn some GM's though.
If I'm Seattle and I can get this year's pick in the teens next year's pick and a b prospect it's a good move but I think Philly makes the pick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nogatco Rd

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
26,774
32,925
Just take the best player.

Sure you could trade it for a goalie - does that prevent that goalie from getting injured all year like their other two goalies just did? No. Bernier and Blackwood isn't even the worst tandem, but if you want to improve on it you can without spending a first overall.

I don't agree that they couldn't find use for a center.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cowumbus

AcerComputer

Registered User
Aug 4, 2014
5,329
3,401
Trade it for a 2023 pick or try to move down in the draft. 1st OA pick is sh*t this year. Worse than 2020.
 

OlfactoryHughes

Registered User
Aug 8, 2007
1,502
471
Northern California
Trade it for a 2023 pick or try to move down in the draft. 1st OA pick is sh*t this year. Worse than 2020.
I don’t think many teams in lottery position are looking to trade unprotected firsts in 2023…

If you get one to bite, you’re gonna have to over pay for the “unprotected” aspect of the trade, and deminish the overall return.

Unless of course it all works out and you luck into Bedard
 

vipera1960

Registered User
Aug 1, 2007
985
610
I don’t think many teams in lottery position are looking to trade unprotected firsts in 2023…

If you get one to bite, you’re gonna have to over pay for the “unprotected” aspect of the trade, and deminish the overall return.

Unless of course it all works out and you luck into Bedard
If you’re trading 1OA to move back a year, you’re getting an unprotected pick. What GM in his right mind would move back a year and guarantee a 10 spot loss?
 

Brodeur

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
26,729
17,460
San Diego
Just not going to happen. Teams dont trade the first overall pick

Depends on the draft year naturally. I attended the 2017 Draft, so I didn't bother rewatching some of the footage until the recent Bobby Clarke comments. Both Darren Dreger and Bob McKenzie said that the Devils were entertaining the idea of trading down to #3 and that Vegas was trying to pull off an elaborate set of trades that would have garnered them the #1 pick. Presumably, Vegas wanted Nolan Patrick and the Devils were okay with whoever remained between Nico Hischier and Cale Makar at #3 if they got enough to move down. It sounded like Dallas had no interest in moving from #3 to #6, so it never came to fruition.

Florida listened on offers for the Aaron Ekblad pick in 2014: Flyers were 'close' to trading up to No. 1 for Aaron Ekblad

Rick Dudley got creative the three times he had the #1 overall pick. Although in each case, he traded down and ended up with the guy he would have taken #1 anyways. That might not apply with the 2022 Draft.

1999: Dudley was GM in Tampa. He was planning on taking Pavel Brendl with the top pick but knew that Brian Burke badly wanted both Sedins. Dudley offered to trade #1 for #4 plus 2nd and 4th rounders. Oddly Burke considered that to be too high a price. On the morning of the draft, Dudley relented and accepted Burke's offer of a pair of 3rd rounders. In Dudley's eyes, he was getting the player he would have taken anyways plus a couple picks. Dudley would then trade the Brendl pick to the Rangers.

2002: Dudley was now GM in Florida and planned on taking Jay Bouwmeester #1. Columbus was picking #3 and wanted Rick Nash but got scared as Philadelphia traded up to #4 on the morning of the draft. They were worried that Philadelphia might swap that pick with Atlanta at #2 and take Nash. Most figured Atlanta was taking Kari Lehtonen or Joni Pitkanen, so they would get one of them at #4. Columbus GM Doug MacLean called up Dudley about swapping picks and they figured out an interesting swap. Columbus gave Dudley the option of swapping 2003 1st round picks, ie Columbus used its presumed lottery odds as an asset. In the end Columbus didn't give up anything in order to secure Nash. Dudley had to give Atlanta an extra pick to promise not to take Bouwmeester at #2 and Florida got Bouwmeester at #3.

2003: Florida won the lottery and had Nathan Horton at the top of their board. Dudley figured they could move down a spot or two and still get Horton. So he shamelessly tried to create a bidding war between Carolina and Pittsburgh. In the end he got a modest return in exchange for swapping #1 for #3.
And then there was the Islanders trading away the Jason Spezza pick in 2001 as they wanted some immediate help.

-------------------------------

If the Devils lucked out and got the #1 pick, Arizona and Montreal would be natural trade partners at #2-4. Coyotes and Canadiens both have a ton of picks. Extra incentive with the draft being in Montreal and it being Kent Hughes' 1st draft as GM. Currently at their disposal:

Arizona: ARZ1 (2nd-4th overall), CAR1 (~30th overall), COL (~30th overall), ARZ2 (~33rd overall), PHI2 (~38th overall), SJS2 (~43rd overall), NYI2 (~44th overall), ARZ3 (~65th overall)

Montreal: MON1 (2nd-4th overall), CGY1 (~30th overall), MON2 (~34th overall), EDM2 (~50th overall), MON3 (~66th overall)

Devils could trade down a couple spots and take Slafkovsky/Nemec/Jiricek then add an extra pick that could be used to trade for immediate help.

Although trading for it for NHL bodies does remind me a bit of the 1999 Draft and Dudley turned the top pick into not a whole lot:

1st = 4th overall + two third rounders
4th overall = Niklas Sundstrom, Dan Cloutier, future 1st rounder
Sundstrom = Andrei Zyuzin plus warm bodies

Dudley thought he was getting his goalie of the present/future in Cloutier, a young former 2nd overall pick in Zyuzin, and another first rounder for his one pick.
 

Vancouver Canucks

Registered User
Feb 8, 2015
14,585
2,587
Depends on the draft year naturally. I attended the 2017 Draft, so I didn't bother rewatching some of the footage until the recent Bobby Clarke comments. Both Darren Dreger and Bob McKenzie said that the Devils were entertaining the idea of trading down to #3 and that Vegas was trying to pull off an elaborate set of trades that would have garnered them the #1 pick. Presumably, Vegas wanted Nolan Patrick and the Devils were okay with whoever remained between Nico Hischier and Cale Makar at #3 if they got enough to move down. It sounded like Dallas had no interest in moving from #3 to #6, so it never came to fruition.

Florida listened on offers for the Aaron Ekblad pick in 2014: Flyers were 'close' to trading up to No. 1 for Aaron Ekblad

Rick Dudley got creative the three times he had the #1 overall pick. Although in each case, he traded down and ended up with the guy he would have taken #1 anyways. That might not apply with the 2022 Draft.

1999: Dudley was GM in Tampa. He was planning on taking Pavel Brendl with the top pick but knew that Brian Burke badly wanted both Sedins. Dudley offered to trade #1 for #4 plus 2nd and 4th rounders. Oddly Burke considered that to be too high a price. On the morning of the draft, Dudley relented and accepted Burke's offer of a pair of 3rd rounders. In Dudley's eyes, he was getting the player he would have taken anyways plus a couple picks. Dudley would then trade the Brendl pick to the Rangers.

2002: Dudley was now GM in Florida and planned on taking Jay Bouwmeester #1. Columbus was picking #3 and wanted Rick Nash but got scared as Philadelphia traded up to #4 on the morning of the draft. They were worried that Philadelphia might swap that pick with Atlanta at #2 and take Nash. Most figured Atlanta was taking Kari Lehtonen or Joni Pitkanen, so they would get one of them at #4. Columbus GM Doug MacLean called up Dudley about swapping picks and they figured out an interesting swap. Columbus gave Dudley the option of swapping 2003 1st round picks, ie Columbus used its presumed lottery odds as an asset. In the end Columbus didn't give up anything in order to secure Nash. Dudley had to give Atlanta an extra pick to promise not to take Bouwmeester at #2 and Florida got Bouwmeester at #3.

2003: Florida won the lottery and had Nathan Horton at the top of their board. Dudley figured they could move down a spot or two and still get Horton. So he shamelessly tried to create a bidding war between Carolina and Pittsburgh. In the end he got a modest return in exchange for swapping #1 for #3.
And then there was the Islanders trading away the Jason Spezza pick in 2001 as they wanted some immediate help.

-------------------------------

If the Devils lucked out and got the #1 pick, Arizona and Montreal would be natural trade partners at #2-4. Coyotes and Canadiens both have a ton of picks. Extra incentive with the draft being in Montreal and it being Kent Hughes' 1st draft as GM. Currently at their disposal:

Arizona: ARZ1 (2nd-4th overall), CAR1 (~30th overall), COL (~30th overall), ARZ2 (~33rd overall), PHI2 (~38th overall), SJS2 (~43rd overall), NYI2 (~44th overall), ARZ3 (~65th overall)

Montreal: MON1 (2nd-4th overall), CGY1 (~30th overall), MON2 (~34th overall), EDM2 (~50th overall), MON3 (~66th overall)

Devils could trade down a couple spots and take Slafkovsky/Nemec/Jiricek then add an extra pick that could be used to trade for immediate help.

Although trading for it for NHL bodies does remind me a bit of the 1999 Draft and Dudley turned the top pick into not a whole lot:

1st = 4th overall + two third rounders
4th overall = Niklas Sundstrom, Dan Cloutier, future 1st rounder
Sundstrom = Andrei Zyuzin plus warm bodies

Dudley thought he was getting his goalie of the present/future in Cloutier, a young former 2nd overall pick in Zyuzin, and another first rounder for his one pick.
And considering there have been busts in recent years, it's good to ask prices for first overalls.
 

Alex NJD

Registered User
Apr 28, 2015
5,139
5,268
Parsippany, New Jersey
Depends on the draft year naturally. I attended the 2017 Draft, so I didn't bother rewatching some of the footage until the recent Bobby Clarke comments. Both Darren Dreger and Bob McKenzie said that the Devils were entertaining the idea of trading down to #3 and that Vegas was trying to pull off an elaborate set of trades that would have garnered them the #1 pick. Presumably, Vegas wanted Nolan Patrick and the Devils were okay with whoever remained between Nico Hischier and Cale Makar at #3 if they got enough to move down. It sounded like Dallas had no interest in moving from #3 to #6, so it never came to fruition.

Florida listened on offers for the Aaron Ekblad pick in 2014: Flyers were 'close' to trading up to No. 1 for Aaron Ekblad

Rick Dudley got creative the three times he had the #1 overall pick. Although in each case, he traded down and ended up with the guy he would have taken #1 anyways. That might not apply with the 2022 Draft.

1999: Dudley was GM in Tampa. He was planning on taking Pavel Brendl with the top pick but knew that Brian Burke badly wanted both Sedins. Dudley offered to trade #1 for #4 plus 2nd and 4th rounders. Oddly Burke considered that to be too high a price. On the morning of the draft, Dudley relented and accepted Burke's offer of a pair of 3rd rounders. In Dudley's eyes, he was getting the player he would have taken anyways plus a couple picks. Dudley would then trade the Brendl pick to the Rangers.

2002: Dudley was now GM in Florida and planned on taking Jay Bouwmeester #1. Columbus was picking #3 and wanted Rick Nash but got scared as Philadelphia traded up to #4 on the morning of the draft. They were worried that Philadelphia might swap that pick with Atlanta at #2 and take Nash. Most figured Atlanta was taking Kari Lehtonen or Joni Pitkanen, so they would get one of them at #4. Columbus GM Doug MacLean called up Dudley about swapping picks and they figured out an interesting swap. Columbus gave Dudley the option of swapping 2003 1st round picks, ie Columbus used its presumed lottery odds as an asset. In the end Columbus didn't give up anything in order to secure Nash. Dudley had to give Atlanta an extra pick to promise not to take Bouwmeester at #2 and Florida got Bouwmeester at #3.

2003: Florida won the lottery and had Nathan Horton at the top of their board. Dudley figured they could move down a spot or two and still get Horton. So he shamelessly tried to create a bidding war between Carolina and Pittsburgh. In the end he got a modest return in exchange for swapping #1 for #3.
And then there was the Islanders trading away the Jason Spezza pick in 2001 as they wanted some immediate help.

-------------------------------

If the Devils lucked out and got the #1 pick, Arizona and Montreal would be natural trade partners at #2-4. Coyotes and Canadiens both have a ton of picks. Extra incentive with the draft being in Montreal and it being Kent Hughes' 1st draft as GM. Currently at their disposal:

Arizona: ARZ1 (2nd-4th overall), CAR1 (~30th overall), COL (~30th overall), ARZ2 (~33rd overall), PHI2 (~38th overall), SJS2 (~43rd overall), NYI2 (~44th overall), ARZ3 (~65th overall)

Montreal: MON1 (2nd-4th overall), CGY1 (~30th overall), MON2 (~34th overall), EDM2 (~50th overall), MON3 (~66th overall)

Devils could trade down a couple spots and take Slafkovsky/Nemec/Jiricek then add an extra pick that could be used to trade for immediate help.

Although trading for it for NHL bodies does remind me a bit of the 1999 Draft and Dudley turned the top pick into not a whole lot:

1st = 4th overall + two third rounders
4th overall = Niklas Sundstrom, Dan Cloutier, future 1st rounder
Sundstrom = Andrei Zyuzin plus warm bodies

Dudley thought he was getting his goalie of the present/future in Cloutier, a young former 2nd overall pick in Zyuzin, and another first rounder for his one pick.
Ya I could see a trade down of a few spots happen if the Devils win #1 (or #2) and a team at #4-6 really want/need a potential 1C prospect and aren't sold on Savoie or Geekie. (Assuming Cooley goes top 3)
 

GAGLine

Registered User
Sep 17, 2007
24,293
21,176
If the #1 was actually on the table for a goalie prospect, I'd have to think Minnesota wouldn't mind being in that conversation.
Why? Minnesota isn't exactly set at goalie at the NHL level. They need Wallstedt more than they need that pick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 57special

Lockin17

Registered User
Jul 31, 2018
3,792
2,946
the NHL ruled that a franchise can win the lottery no more than twice in a five-year span.
That isn't exclusive to the first overall pick: It means a team can't advance by reason of lottery win more than twice in a five-year span.
So Buffalo and Devils can't win
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: The Alien

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad