Toggle sidebar

Blue Jays GDT: 2021 v2 |Next: Wed, Apr 21| @ Bos |7pm ET/4pm PT | Thornton vs Richards

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Is it just me but doesn't every Biggio throw look like he has to put everything in it? Compensating for a weak arm. Its rough watching sometimes. Nothing graceful. Feels like his arm is eventually going to fall off.
 
Da Cool Rula said:
Is it just me but doesn't every Biggio throw look like he has to put everything in it? Compensating for a weak arm. Its rough watching sometimes. Nothing graceful. Feels like his arm is eventually going to fall off.
Click to expand...

Except that Semien chose to play 2nd, it's why I would've much preferred Biggio to stay at 2nd and Semien to play 3rd. Cavan just doesn't have the arm for 3B. Because he does have to max effort it just to get across the diamond at a slow pace.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Puckstuff
The hell are they even doing?

This seems like good evidence that the umpires don't even understand the rules and procedures of their own game.
 
Suntouchable13 said:
WTF was that? Boone too, what in the world did he even see? I don't trust Buck, is catcher interference a reviewable play?
Click to expand...

I'm getting conflicting info from google. There's someone whinging on Reddit in 2017 saying it was reviewable but shouldn't be, and then there's the beginnings of a BP article from 2019 that I can't read without a membership that suggests it isn't reviewable (but should be).

I'm inclined to believe the former over the latter, which means Buck is right and it's not a reviewable incident. But we don't even know if that's what they were looking at (and if it was it sure took them a hell of a long time to make a ruling when the broadcast side-view camera was pretty cut and dry that his bat never came anywhere close to Jansen's glove.
 
Suntouchable13 said:
WTF was that? Boone too, what in the world did he even see? I don't trust Buck, is catcher interference a reviewable play?
Click to expand...

I'm getting conflicting info from google. There's someone whinging on Reddit in 2017 saying it was reviewable but shouldn't be, and then there's the beginnings of a BP article from 2019 that I can't read without a membership that suggests it isn't.

I'm inclined to believe the former over the latter, which means Buck is right and it's not a reviewable incident. But we don't even know if that's what they were looking at (and if it was it sure took them a hell of a long time to make a ruling when the broadcast side-view camera was pretty cut and dry that his bat never came anywhere close to Jansen's glove.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom