Kleefeld
Registered User
- Feb 21, 2018
- 69
- 67
He is extremely good player but even 2 Seiders wouldn't save this team.This team needs Seider.
If we had a real goaltender the score would be way more comfortable. Hopefully Bugl will settle things out for us
Germany did this for quite a while up until 5-6 years ago. Now we still have the occasional German-Canadian in the team.In the World Baseball Classic, Anthony Rizzo was going to play for team Italy due to having Italian ancestry. He had never lived there.
Does the World Juniors allow something similar? If so, maybe it would make sense for Germany to allow players with German ancestry on their team?
This way they could give opportunities to some very capable players who weren’t selected for Teams Canada or USA? Wouldn’t this be better for the sport?
Germany (and other countries) can supplement and complement their own home grown players but also insure that the quality of the overall roster is sufficient.
Germany did this for quite a while up until 5-6 years ago. Now we still have the occasional German-Canadian in the team.
But lately we’re on the brink of developing talents quite regularly and I think going back to the “old” system would hurt that development. I mean look at the last few years alone:
Draisaitl, Kahun, Stützle, Bokk, Peterka, Seider, Reichel... that’s more talent in 4-5 years than we had in the 20 years before. (Subjective feeling)
We’re lacking heavily in D talents and Goalies though, which has never been an issue before. So unless the future strategy is to score 10 goals minimum to win 10-9 we’ll have to work on that.
I do disagree. More icetime for players that are not brought up from the German junior system will lead to less incentives for our own clubs to produce talent. It’s a very short-term view to think that stacking our lines with German-Canadians or German-Americans will benefit us in the long-term. We’ve been there, didn’t work.
One 16-2, especially under the circumstances, will hopefully not put the whole development into question.
To me it absolutely sounds like faking progress.shouldn’t they try to maximize the opportunity to show progress?
To me it absolutely sounds like faking progress.
I do disagree. More icetime for players that are not brought up from the German junior system will lead to less incentives for our own clubs to produce talent. It’s a very short-term view to think that stacking our lines with German-Canadians or German-Americans will benefit us in the long-term. We’ve been there, didn’t work.
One 16-2, especially under the circumstances, will hopefully not put the whole development into question.
You are spot on. As a Latvian hockey fan, I can say we have certainly been the the receiving end of such scorelines more than once, but it is all about giving chances and opportunities to local players. Still remember how now NHL all-rookie team goalie Merzlikins ate all 14 pucks from team Russia a decade ago, doesn't seem to have hurt him one bit.
If your end goal is just to have a competitive junior tournament for the sake of it, I see nothing wrong with it.I don’t see how making things more competitive by allowing freedom of movement is fake progress.
I don't know what you are even aiming at. So if Stutzle now becomes a good NHLer after yesterdays loss, he also will do so despite playing for Germany?Merzļikins became a top player despite playing for Latvia rather than because of it though.
If your end goal is just to have a competitive junior tournament for the sake of it, I see nothing wrong with it.
We have gone a bit offtopic, so this will be my last entry here. IMO, this "grandparent of country x" is slippery slope, why do you draw the line at that level? Can Connor McDavid just opt for team GB because of his Scottish last name? Surely there is ancestry link to Britain if you go far enough in time, right? It will be as arbitrary as basically becoming ''free for all" anyway, losing the meaning of "national team competition'' ala Qatar just buying a full handball team and becoming World champions.I saw your other comment about giving opportunities to local players. I respect that. But at the same time, having such horrible goalies, like you saw with Germany, isn’t really good for the sport or for WJ either.
But there’s another part of this. If the powers that be practice politics in selecting their national teams, they should do so with some risk. The fear of a Canadian player named Andersson going and playing for Sweden (the country of his grandfather) and helping Team Sweden win the tournament creates the incentive for the powers that be to be fair in choosing players for their national teams.
If they want to do favors to agents or carry out a vendetta against certain organizations by leaving better players off the roster, it should come with some risk.
Simultaneously, the young players that are the victims in this, should have freedom of movement to participate in the tournament while playing for another team (as long as that country is ok with it).
We have gone a bit offtopic, so this will be my last entry here. IMO, this "grandparent of country x" is slippery slope, why do you draw the line at that level? Can Connor McDavid just opt for team GB because of his Scottish last name? Surely there is ancestry link to Britain if you go far enough in time, right? It will be as arbitrary as basically becoming ''free for all" anyway, losing the meaning of "national team competition'' ala Qatar just buying a full handball team and becoming World champions.
He’ll have a nice DEL career but he’s not even CHL level.On a positive note, I really like Elias so far. Has skill and battles his a** off. Not a product of Stutzle+Peterka.