bleedblue1223
Registered User
- Jan 21, 2011
- 52,919
- 16,367
Similar amounts of credit from all sides. Berube has proven to be an excellent man manager of being a tough player's coach. He does really well of straddling that line of being setting a high standard for his players, but not taking it too far where he has a short shelf life as a coach, which tends to be an issue for those types of coaches. Army has proven to be one of the elite GMs out there. Even in some of the mistakes he's made, he's found ways to get out of them, and he's managed to keep the prospect pipeline flowing enough to develop both NHL contributors and trade chips to bring in more established talent, and a pretty good job on deciding which prospects are worth keeping and which are worth trading.
Still probably have to give the players the most credit for developing into high-end players. At the end of the day, it's up to them to put the work in to make, and then putting the extra work in to be better than your peers.
Yeah, with those 2 and Buch, we essentially acquired a 1st line for Blais and a 2nd. Throw in the decision Army made to protect Barbashev, and we more or less added another top 6 forward. Army probably had one of the best off-seasons of his career by being shrewd with the expansion draft, holding Tarasenko, and acquiring Buch.
Still probably have to give the players the most credit for developing into high-end players. At the end of the day, it's up to them to put the work in to make, and then putting the extra work in to be better than your peers.
Yeah, with those 2 and Buch, we essentially acquired a 1st line for Blais and a 2nd. Throw in the decision Army made to protect Barbashev, and we more or less added another top 6 forward. Army probably had one of the best off-seasons of his career by being shrewd with the expansion draft, holding Tarasenko, and acquiring Buch.
Last edited: