that one actually got me digging in the rulebook a bit, seems like they really don't want that happening, 10 without 2.. i went back and only thing i see was kopi got away with a pretty solid slash on konecny there to prevent a scoring opportunity and he immediately threw his arms up and yelled at the ref, i'm assuming that it continued cause the whistle didn't go for quite a while and after his little tantrum all the yelling was off-screen
kinda interesting though, there's a table in the index that dictates all the situations where a misconduct applies and the only ones that fit are rules 39 and 75, "abuse of officials" and "unsportsmanlike conduct" and 75 only applies if the abuse is directed at another player. 39.4 is subtitled "misconduct penalties"
39.4(i) Any player who persists in the use of obscene, profane or abusive language towards any on or off-ice official for which he has already been assessed a minor or bench minor penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct.
39.4(viii) In general, participants displaying this type of behaviour are assessed a minor penalty, then a misconduct penalty and then a game misconduct penalty if they persist.
so like, you should only be given a misconduct if you already got a minor, and they even further clarify in the rule that "in general" it proceeds in that order. seems like it's actually not using the rulebook correctly to give 10 without 2
refs ignoring the rulebook? what's new right?