TannedBum
Registered User
- Jul 23, 2014
- 2,204
- 1,290
You mean when he left LA 62 games ago. It's a 100% fluke and he's only getting slower.Toffoli's been scoring at that pace since he left LA. Let's see what he can do over a full season...
You mean when he left LA 62 games ago. It's a 100% fluke and he's only getting slower.Toffoli's been scoring at that pace since he left LA. Let's see what he can do over a full season...
You mean when he left LA 62 games ago. It's a 100% fluke and he's only getting slower.
Oh come on already. Look at the f***ing sample size. If anything, now it's the only time to trade Toffoli when the price is higher than 2nd round pick.2 different teams in 2 different years suggests it may not be a fluke. The proof will be in the pudding...
They did great as a line in the PO also, I just don't know why would you change that? I mean Toff-Suzy-CC
If anything, now it's the only time to trade Toffoli when the price is higher than 2nd round pick.
I mean balance is the key here. 1 player on a line with less defensive ability with two solid two way players is extremely common.
Dvorak is a goal scoring two way center who benefits off playmaking wingers. Drouin is arguably our best playmaking winger. It makes a ton of sense to our them together.
Same problem if you put him with Suzuki or Evans.I agree that it's probably the best place for Drouin but what I'm saying is that you're taking a line (Dvorak and Gallagher) which could be one of the better two way lines in the league and making it one dimensional because Drouin is so bad defensively that if would turn an elite defensive line to an average one.
The owner clearly stated a few months back, the “retool is over” how does that align with trading a “win now” player?Oh come on already. Look at the f***ing sample size. If anything, now it's the only time to trade Toffoli when the price is higher than 2nd round pick.
Well, it's a little sad if the owner and MB think it's worth pressing the "win now" button in the current situation. Now that things are leveling off and the divisions&schedule are back to normal. We can't get anywhere near the playoffs with that defense and offensive structure that is as unbalanced as it can be. Everyone who thinks we can make it is ultimately delusional.The owner clearly stated a few months back, the “retool is over” how does that align with trading a “win now” player?
Its a business not the Salvation Army - what’s sad is 2-years of lost revenue for a business.Well, it's a little sad if the owner and MB think it's worth pressing the "win now" button in the current situation. Now that things are leveling off and the divisions&schedule are back to normal. We can't get anywhere near the playoffs with that defense and offensive structure that is as unbalanced as it can be. Everyone who thinks we can make it is ultimately delusional.
Well, it's a little sad if the owner and MB think it's worth pressing the "win now" button in the current situation. Now that things are leveling off and the divisions&schedule are back to normal. We can't get anywhere near the playoffs with that defense and offensive structure that is as unbalanced as it can be. Everyone who thinks we can make it is ultimately delusional.
Toffoli-Suzuki-Caufield
Hoffman-Dvorak-Gallagher
Drouin-Poehling-Anderson
Lehkonen-Evans-Armia
Extra: Perreault, Paquette
Edmundson-Petry
Romanov-Chariot
Norlinder-Savard
Extra: Kulak
price
Allen
Toffoli - Suzuki - Caufield - had good chemistry during playoffs. Two shooters and a set up man. What's not to like?
Drouin - Dvorak - Gally - playmaking winger, shooter/net crasher and defensively responsible center who can also shoot.
Hoffman - Poehling - Anderson - Lot's of size and speed and can open space for Hoffman and drive play forward.
Perrault/Lehkonen - Evans/Paquette - Armia - Grind, skill and defensively responible. Terrific 4th line combos with all the names that can draw in.
Note* I wouldn't be surprised if Bozak was our 3rd line center coming out of camp/
Edmundson - Petry - defacto top pairing.
Chiarot - Savard - can see equal icetime to 1st pairing depending on opponent.
Romanov - Kulak/Wideman - Yes, Romanov on LD as coaching staff said that's where they want to develop him.
Note* I wouldn't be surprised is they signed a RD to a PTO like Demers or Vantanen.
I can see either on the wing with Suzuki tbh and switching them also work.Not bad. Only two areas I would be concerned about.
Hoffman with the inexperienced Poehling and the inconsistent Anderson is a risky line. I have either Toffoli or Anderson with Suzuki/Caufield and in the later part of the playoffs, Anderson was very good with them. I think they could use his power forward game. Don't hate Toffoli with them but at 5/5, I think I would try Anderson at first. He's extremely motivated by playing with them IMO. We need a motivated Anderson and Toffoli can fit well with Dvorak as well.
Savard with Chiarot. I hate this idea and I'm sure they try it. I would have Romanov with Chiarot. Savard with Kulak.
You can pretty much lock in Lehkonen with Evans IMO.
Actually I'm not a soulless suit who only cares about the team's bottom line so it is sad that this team is once more pretending it can contend to trick it's fanbase again with mediocrity.Its a business not the Salvation Army - what’s sad is 2-years of lost revenue for a business.
A lot of mediocrity(mid6 forwards) doesn't mean we are deep. We lack the tip of the sword. In defense we only have a f***ing handle and you're talking about contending.We may have the deepest forward groups in the league, and Price who is the best playoff goalie. With Caufield and Suzuki on entry level contracts, we may as well go for a cup now. We can hang with any team and the only team that is clearly better than us is Tampa. If we can add good rental Dman (or if somehow Weber comes back for the POs), we are about as good as any contender.
IMO we should either blow it up or contend. I don't think we should re-tool.