Mats26
Vet Movement - What's the Maatta?
- Sep 16, 2005
- 3,865
- 3,799
I vocalized my concern with the Danault contract to Hoven. He told me what he said in the recent KotP (where he interviews Trevor Moore).
He summarizes it as an insurance policy. Which makes enough sense. It insulates Vilardi and Byfield from forcing them to perform in a role.
I don't think it's so much keeping them in the AHL all season. But it's about letting them play in less of a pressure situation.
I'm still wary of the contract long-term. But I'm okay with the short-term approach.
They HAVE to start playing these prospects soon. Otherwise they'll be subject to waivers with no NHL experience.
I get the insurance policy part. We expected a kid, after only 10 NHL games to be our 2C, and he simply wasn't ready.
Some of us were saying it all year, Vilardi looked off and should of been sheltered, maybe even sent down for a few games to get his mojo back. Let's just say it was not well received on these boards. Even though, he still ended the season with decent numbers, showed some flashes at times, so there is hope there.
But like I said in another post, this addition never happens if Vilardi took the 2C roster spot and ran with it. Seems to me this is a reactionary signing, purely based on almost mismanaging Vilardi and we want to avoid it happening with other prospects.
I am fine with it, 2C was a short term concern and addressed now.
Term is too long but 3 years seems to be the sweet spot with Kopitar's contact ending and Danault's NMC lifted.