Casper The Soy Ghost
Registered User
- Jan 11, 2013
- 8,822
- 5,376
Someone (Kings fan) proposed Kempe/Kupari + 2nd for Kravtsov, what do you guys think about that?
/Rangers fan
/Rangers fan
Hell no Counter Wagner and 3rdSomeone (Kings fan) proposed Kempe/Kupari + 2nd for Kravtsov, what do you guys think about that?
/Rangers fan
Someone (Kings fan) proposed Kempe/Kupari + 2nd for Kravtsov, what do you guys think about that?
/Rangers fan
How the hell can anyone look at Danault's body of work, including preseason with the Kings, and crap on him at this point
I'm sorry but that's beyond rational reasoning, you're just out of your skull. The guy is a monster hockey player, and had 76% of the shot attempts despite the toughest starts on the team in the preseason, picking up just where he left off in MTL.
Someone (Kings fan) proposed Kempe/Kupari + 2nd for Kravtsov, what do you guys think about that?
/Rangers fan
Yeah I said a 2nd would be enough, but if you want to give us that as well, sure!That was me, and I was told by Rangers fans the 2nd was too rich, haha.
But Kupari and a thing (I was thinking LATE 2nd but not sure what we have) for Kravtsov gave the Rangers a natural C and us a natural W, made sense to me.
Someone (Kings fan) proposed Kempe/Kupari + 2nd for Kravtsov, what do you guys think about that?
/Rangers fan
I love the player. Hate the contract.How the hell can anyone look at Danault's body of work, including preseason with the Kings, and crap on him at this point
I'm sorry but that's beyond rational reasoning, you're just out of your skull. The guy is a monster hockey player, and had 76% of the shot attempts despite the toughest starts on the team in the preseason, picking up just where he left off in MTL.
Vilardi is more creative in his young years than Kopitar ever was.
No. Just f***ing no.
Someone (Kings fan) proposed Kempe/Kupari + 2nd for Kravtsov, what do you guys think about that?
/Rangers fan
I love the player. Hate the contract.
Well like I said, we’ll just see at the end of the season which center has the third most points. My skull is intact and I’m just out here shooting off my opinions just like you, RJ.How the hell can anyone look at Danault's body of work, including preseason with the Kings, and crap on him at this point
I'm sorry but that's beyond rational reasoning, you're just out of your skull. The guy is a monster hockey player, and had 76% of the shot attempts despite the toughest starts on the team in the preseason, picking up just where he left off in MTL.
I think players have an objective cap value based on their skill set and age.Bottom dweller teams like the Kings don't get good UFAs unless they pay a little more for them. It's the price you pay for sucking ass the last 7 years.
Bottom dweller teams like the Kings don't get good UFAs unless they pay a little more for them. It's the price you pay for sucking ass the last 7 years.
Well if he was playing 4c he’d probably waive it. Besides, it was a hypothetical and I don’t think need to lose much sleep about it at this stage. If Danault is our 4c we are likely in a fight for the Stanley Cup and we’d definitely be in great shape.No you can’t. Not only did the Kings overpay for a 4C defensive specialist as soon as next season, they gave him a no movement clause for the first three seasons. I know many of you were all excited about this signing, but we might very well be regretting it in 12 months.
Subtract the 2nd and dealSomeone (Kings fan) proposed Kempe/Kupari + 2nd for Kravtsov, what do you guys think about that?
/Rangers fan
Maybe not but Danault certainly is.Danauld is not a hockey player and will find himself on line 3 or 4 very soon.