Jakey53
Registered User
- Aug 27, 2011
- 30,696
- 9,554
Kessel, Stepan, Goligoski, Demers, and Raanta are basically worthless, and untradeable. Nobody wants any of them re-signed. We didn't pick until the 5th round. We're over the cap. The team had the 10th worst record in the NHL last season, and the 4th worst over the last four years. The future isn't any brighter than when he found the team and the team isn't any better. The last four years were a complete waste of time and the team is basically where it was when he found it; in the basement with almost nothing going for it.I wouldn't assign a guy that has been drafted and developed well prior to a GM's arrival a pick value and then include it in a tally for optics value. Murphy has never been better than Hjalmarsson. He was an okay use of a late first. Martinook never became the player he was drafted to be but has had a nice career as a solid bottom six guy. These are replacement level players and the trades did not represent a catastrophic misuse of players or assets. They represent an opportunity cost of not drafting someone better but that's not really Chayka's problem.
If you pursued all asset flips to their conclusion, you would need to account for things like the Kuemper trade and Demers for McGinn. Trading the 2017 picks looks prudent at this moment, given the weakness of the draft and POJ not really taking that next step (but also not busting). Even Martinook was eventually turned into Hinostroza, Oesterle, and the very necessary at the time Hossa contract. A 2nd round pick terminating into just Oesterle 8 years later is not a super useful observation.
And if we're talking about completely capturing a GM's ability to spend assets to find talent, you would also have to factor in his draft picks, which have been pretty solid. The list looks less offensive with Keller and Chychrun on it. Garland too, since he was directly responsible for that pick.
He left the organization in worse shape for a variety of reasons but the roster is more talented I'd say. His churn was okay overall. They're not at all positioned like a young team should be but the mandate may have simply been to make the playoffs and go for it ASAP. If Soderstrom, Hayton, Maccelli, Jenik etc... pan out then I think he gets another job, depending on how teams feel about the Meruelo Coyotes and his exit.
That would make the team worse now and in the past. Raanta has been a very good goalie, Stepan has been a solid all around center, sometimes even good. This is an emotional argument that really only makes any sort of sense for Kessel but we've beaten the shit out of that dead horse.
Positivity.Kessel, Stepan, Goligoski, Demers, and Raanta are basically worthless, and untradeable. Nobody wants any of them re-signed. We didn't pick until the 5th round. We're over the cap. The team had the 10th worst record in the NHL last season, and the 4th worst over the last four years. The future isn't any brighter than when he found the team and the team isn't any better. The last four years were a complete waste of time and the team is basically where it was when he found it; in the basement with almost nothing going for it.
I have a pretty similar take on Maloney, even when public opinion 'round here kinda turned on him a couple years ago so it shouldn't be too surprising .
Strome and Marner were pretty even to go third. Most of the experts had Strome going third. He was a center with good size, unlike Marner. I don't think Maloney made a mistake at the time., and I don't think Maloney would have sent him to Chicago when Chayka did. Chayka just had to move guys (Domi) he didn't pick. Marner would never have put up 61 points in 2016 playing for the Coyotes and he definitely wouldn't have put up 94 in 2018-19.Biggest knock against Maloney is Strome pick.
I know Strome was a consensus pick but he still blew a #3 overall which ususally guarantees a franchise player or top liner
Blew it by trading the player (likely on Tocchet's recommendation) after the player became a 1C in the AHL without giving him a chance in the NHL. Strome immediately went on to success elsewhere.
Picking him wasn't the problem.
he bas not maintained success in Chicago worthy of his draft position.
He was playing with DeBrincat and Kane when he put up most of those points. His numbers are inflated.... 89 points in 116 games is .76 PPG.
He'd be 8 points ahead of the Coyotes leading scorer this year if he was healthy enough to play 70 games. 15 points ahead of the Coyote's leading scorer in 18-19 (Keller), 25 if you use his actual scoring clip from that season.
The player is not the problem in this situation.
Redo that draft and it's unlikely Strome goes in the top 10. It was a bad pick then and it looks worse by the year.Blew it by trading the player (likely on Tocchet's recommendation) after the player became a 1C in the AHL without giving him a chance in the NHL. Strome immediately went on to success elsewhere.
Picking him wasn't the problem.
So you are saying you like our chances for next season?Kessel, Stepan, Goligoski, Demers, and Raanta are basically worthless, and untradeable. Nobody wants any of them re-signed. We didn't pick until the 5th round. We're over the cap. The team had the 10th worst record in the NHL last season, and the 4th worst over the last four years. The future isn't any brighter than when he found the team and the team isn't any better. The last four years were a complete waste of time and the team is basically where it was when he found it; in the basement with almost nothing going for it.
Kessel, Stepan, Goligoski, Demers, and Raanta are basically worthless, and untradeable. Nobody wants any of them re-signed. We didn't pick until the 5th round. We're over the cap. The team had the 10th worst record in the NHL last season, and the 4th worst over the last four years. The future isn't any brighter than when he found the team and the team isn't any better. The last four years were a complete waste of time and the team is basically where it was when he found it; in the basement with almost nothing going for it.
He definitely does not go top 10.Redo that draft and it's unlikely Strome goes in the top 10. It was a bad pick then and it looks worse by the year.
Yes but he was consensus top 4. Unfortunately, the Coyotes ran out of patience.Redo that draft and it's unlikely Strome goes in the top 10. It was a bad pick then and it looks worse by the year.
Yes but he was consensus top 4. Unfortunately, the Coyotes ran out of patience.
Personally, I was leery about Strome's skating and that Marne's' game would not translate to the bigger, faster NHL. I wanted the team to trade down to grab one of the 3 D (I wanted Werenski or Provorov).
It doesn't matter if most people would have made the same mistake, its still a mistake. The GM'S job is to not make that mistake with such a crucial pick. As an easy example the following year almost everyone else had Poolparty at number 3 yet Columbus picked Dubois.Yes but he was consensus top 4. Unfortunately, the Coyotes ran out of patience.
Personally, I was leery about Strome's skating and that Marne's' game would not translate to the bigger, faster NHL. I wanted the team to trade down to grab one of the 3 D (I wanted Werenski or Provorov).
Yes but it would have been shocking if Strome fell below 6th. Cant see both Carolina and New Jersey passing on him (5 and 6th picks). In 11 pre draft rankings he was rated; 5, 5, 3, 3, 4, 3, 7, 3. 4, 4, and 4. Combination bad luck, poor development, not having a coach that would play to his strengths, and a trigger happy GM. Almost every draft some top rated guy does not pan out.Yeah, there's a crucial difference between consensus and unanimous. Personally I don't put much stock in consensus when it comes to drafting.
I am not arguing that- in hindsight - it was a mistake. I even stated I would have trade down because I was worried about his skating.It doesn't matter if most people would have made the same mistake, its still a mistake. The GM'S job is to not make that mistake with such a crucial pick. As an easy example the following year almost everyone else had Poolparty at number 3 yet Columbus picked Dubois.
It was a franchise defining draft and we blew it. We prioritized C so we ignored Stromes skating and that he was sheltered behind McDavid in Erie.
I think biggest knock against Maloney was getting out tanked by Buffalo.I don’t think Maloney gets enough credit. I would have liked to see what he could have done without NHL ownership. And he correctly called for a rebuild with the Yandle trade. His drafting record was not good but during his tenure we had 1 euro scout. So the operation was thin. Biggest knock against Maloney is Strome pick.
It was a franchise defining draft and we blew it. We prioritized C so we ignored Stromes skating and that he was sheltered behind McDavid in Erie.