Obviously I've never seen any of these top picks play very much, other than a few tournament games and the odd YouTube highlight package.
But scouts and people in 'the know', say Lafreniere is the best first overall picks since McDavid in 2015. So obviously 'when' and in what year you win the first overall selection matters. In 2017 for example, Elias Pettersson might prove to be the best player in that draft, despite being selected 5th overall.
If this was a normal Stanley Cup playoff year, and the Canucks had legitimately made the post-season by finishing in one of the top eight spots in the Western Conference, then you'd want your team to go as far as it can.
But it's worth noting that when the 2019-20 season was cut short, the Canucks were officially below the playoff bar in the West. So who knows where they'd have finished without Markstrom and probably Tanev? And of course if they lose to the Wild, the Canucks would still be officially below the playoff bar, and a lottery team.
So despite all the rhetoric about NHL parity and "anything can happen in the playoffs' this probably wasn't the Canucks season anyway. But actually winning the first overall pick, would set this team up for the next decade.
So I guess your view depends on whether you take the short term, or long term view with this team. Is the first overall pick a better option than a playoff round or two? Over to other posters on this one.