ru4reals
Registered User
- Jul 4, 2007
- 12,104
- 7,723
So this isn't a kicked in goal?
If I'm a player I'm practicing this move every day. If they're gonna count it I'm using it. That was all disguised in a purposeful way.
So this isn't a kicked in goal?
and that's the point. You have to have greater expectations to expect to get better.The Kings org sent me an email that they are “raising expectations and expect to be in the playoffs.
So just except it because they're supposed to be outworked? Sounds like a winning mentality.
For which season?The Kings org sent me an email that they are “raising expectations and expect to be in the playoffs.
The Kings org sent me an email that they are “raising expectations and expect to be in the playoffs.
I enjoyed the game. Just because I have expectations doesn't mean I can't enjoy it. Even the losses. It's all a part of the process. I wouldn't assume how others are feeling based solely on a message board. That's very presumptuous. I don't think it's me who's in for long year based how your post.Dude, you are going to be in for a season of pain/anger/heartbreak if you can’t reevaluate your expectations.
I heard it on the broadcast also. Faust said they are going to be buyers and expect to make the playoffs. If thats their expectation they are gonna have to spend a lot for this roster to go far. Laine would be great but they need more pieces than him anyway. Peterson and Quick would have to play amazing and steal games. I think another tank season and expecting playoffs next season is more realistic but its still way early to tell if you want to judge by performance and not on paper.The Kings org sent me an email that they are “raising expectations and expect to be in the playoffs.
They were physically outmatched and wore down in the third. Kopitar in particular looked like he had really heavy legs. The Wild had inside positioning and several times it was just their length to get to pucks first. Great late shifts by Greenway and Foligno.
I mentioned it earlier, but the Kings have a lot of players who cover very little ground. Not just size or speed, but what I call a sphere of influence, meaning the range of space around them that they can positively affect at any time. Effective mobility, if you will. Not a lot of that in this group.
Are there really no HF posters that question Quick as well as Brown?
Quick almost did a pokecheck by accident, but no, he pulled all his gear back to be on his heels, and watched the puck trickle between his legs. If he had charged the shooter and attacked the puck, he could have made the save.
Re-watch the video, and follow the puck and how close it was to Quick's stick. It was easy pickings.
Still looking for a progressive goaltending coach I see.
i see that but i also see him going backhand-forehand after feinting the shot so you get that "meta-game" going on between the shooter and goalieAre there really no HF posters that question Quick as well as Brown?
Quick almost did a pokecheck by accident, but no, he pulled all his gear back to be on his heels, and watched the puck trickle between his legs. If he had charged the shooter and attacked the puck, he could have made the save.
Re-watch the video, and follow the puck and how close it was to Quick's stick. It was easy pickings.
Still looking for a progressive goaltending coach I see.
i see that but i also see him going backhand-forehand after feinting the shot so you get that "meta-game" going on between the shooter and goalie
i think quick's poke check feint was enough to make kaprizov lose the puck, he just happened to lose it into his skate which was angled perfectly
would an aggressive poke check have stopped it? probably, but i also think the backhand-forehand would've been an easy chip-in if he missed the poke
yeah that top 9 isn't the worst thing i've seen. amadio et al were the definition of worthless tonight and i can't wait to see who they're replaced by..Kopitar and Vilardi were stellar on the draw tonight. A top nine of...
Iafallo - Kopitar - Brown
Kempe - Vilardi - Carter
Wagner - Andersson - Athanasiou
...actually isn't terrible. Well, I'm making a guess on Andersson, but I think having Lizotte as our fourth-line center is tge best case scenario. He just gets pushed around by other teams' top lines. I like the kid a lot but he just shouldn't be getting more than 10 minutes a game, I'm sorry. Maybe have a fourth line of JAD - Lizotte - Grundstrom? I just don't see anything of value from Moore - Amadio - Luff, which is to me a glorified AHL scoring line.
As for the defense, I mean, Clague wasn't great. I know he's young, and Alt is an AHLer, but he needs to be more poised with the puck. Maybe it was the ice, but I felt like he was constantly whiffing or falling. It wasn't a great look.
I'd rather see:
Maatta - Doughty
Anderson - Roy
Bjornfot - Walker
MacDermid
I think the Anderson - Roy pairing is our best pairing. I'm as staunch of a Doughty proponent as there is, but he needs to tone it down by about a hundred percent. He hasn't looked great to be honest.
Quick... looked like Quick. Three more years...
If I'm a player I'm practicing this move every day. If they're gonna count it I'm using it. That was all disguised in a purposeful way.
Can't have Doughty playing 29:12. That's 8:00 more than the next closest D-man.