CanadianKingsFan14
Registered User
I'd move Roy or Walker in a heartbeat for Laine. Hell I'd probably even move Bjornfot.
I'd move Clague before Bjornfot.
I'd move Roy or Walker in a heartbeat for Laine. Hell I'd probably even move Bjornfot.
oh for sure, but if Winnipeg is willing to trade Laine for a hypothetical package of Roy, Bjornfot and whatever you do it and then worry about d later.I'd move Clague before Bjornfot.
f*** aaaaaaaalllllll of that. Laine is NOT worth it.Without any attention to WPG's needs, I'd say Unprotected 2022 1st, 2022 2nd, one of our 2nds this year, Kaliyev, Kupari/another top prospect.
Only WPG fan that won't make fun of me for it I can think of is @Holden Caulfield .
But I can't imagine that would get done without a Turcotte/Vilardi/2nd OA which of course should be a nonstarter for the Kings, and we'd be right back at square one, we're not in a position to do that.
Edit: judging by the trade thread I just saw they're looking for a top d-man--which we don't have--and a top-C, which we have in prospect form, but wouldn't be worth it for us.
Pass. As has been stated, a Laine type is what you trade for after you've got some prospect graduates who turn out and you're already a playoff team. It's just not his talent you're trading for. What type of contract is he going to demand next offseason? $8+ million AAV? On top of the fact you're going to trade multiple high value assets to acquire him.
Agree.The Kings vaunted prospect pool has what, maybe 15 combined NHL games? Lets see what we really have before sending any of it away.
You don't spend your money on fancy rims when your transmission is in disrepair. Scoring wingers from the outside come last, when you can afford to spend excess picks and prospects on them after all the most important boxes are checked.
Agree.
Though your reference to the transmission is exactly why I like the idea of throwing a ton of futures at Tampa for Sergachev, for example. Not that he’s necessarily going to be available, but its the type of piece I think you make that deal for.
Boring? Have you watched the King's? You have? Well I have not. Because they've been too damn boring. Boring players playing boring hockey for 4 years. Oh yeah. And they've been getting plugged while doing so.Besides signing a LD in the off-season, how about we be really boring for a season or two before we go and give up on any our prized assets?
Boring? Have you watched the King's? You have? Well I have not. Because they've been too damn boring. Boring players playing boring hockey for 4 years. Oh yeah. And they've been getting plugged while doing so.
I'm not interested in boring for another 2 years. After all the shit that we have been through as a country why the hell would we shovel cash to be bored? Naah. Too many options in LA. Too much exciting sports teams for anyone to give a shit.
I'm not saying the King's should destroy the rebuild but for Gods sake I don't ever want to hear fans ok with boredom. Nothing about the King's brings an ounce of excitement. On or off the ice.
thats not entirely true. On a daily basis I get told by Ottawa fans who we are going to draft and why.
Toronto fans tell me Doughty sucks and Fans from many teams told me it was a mistake signing Walker to that expensive of contract because “they” have never heard of him.
I get Kings news daily.
So... what was it like getting fired from the suicide hot line?
Got me all pumped up. Even if it's just reliving the last six(!) months in fast forward.
"there's something to be said about the special feeling that you guys are part of something that is just starting"
from like 6:35 on, man. excited about the future.
also lol mark masters is Jonah Hill, prove me wrong
What’s with all the lovin on Laine?
Kid has been a throwback full 60’ player of legend.
Yeah, he has that one-timer. And that’s it.
Conner passed him on the depth chart in the ‘Peg long time ago.
Hard pass on Laine at any price. Not even worth future considerations if you want you team to win.
I'm not talking about trading prospects. I'm talking about creating buzz. Condoning being "boring" is insane to me. The King's need to create buzz. This is LA for Christ's sakes.letting our prospects blossom rather than trade them ≠ style of play
...but nice tangent you went off there.
Two Stanley Cups weren't enough to create persistent buzz in LA for the Kings. lolI'm not talking about trading prospects. I'm talking about creating buzz. Condoning being "boring" is insane to me. The King's need to create buzz. This is LA for Christ's sakes.
Part of rebuilding is supplementing the prospects along the way. Stockpiling talent and hoping they hit is stupid. The King's need to at least kick tires. They need a social makeover.