Huck Cheever
Registered User
- Sep 27, 2018
- 855
- 503
GeekieThink Savoie would play for Winnipeg?
Does winnipeg go for one of their hometown players?
Yeah, it all depends what they need. But if you are talking about points, Mateychuk's 61 in 36 games from the blue line are quite an accomplishment. Geekie has the size for WHL but his speed isn't quite there yet. Yet no one I've seen is better with puck protection than Geekie. My guess is they'll pick one of those two kids.Connor Geekie might not be a bad pick for them. Led WBAAA in goals and points, 6'3, 14 year old.
How embarrassing would it be for the WHL and Hockey Canada to grant Savoie exceptional status, only to get drafted by Prince George and then turn around and commit to the NCAA?
He also needed exceptional status in order to play in the AJHL next year as a 15. It all sounds like his plan all along is to play college.I got the information from a friend who works for a team in the WHL. That he heard through other sources in the team. I can't really say for sure if this is all the info or if it is 100% correct but it's all I got. And when you connect the dots it makes sense. How embarrassing would it be for the WHL and Hockey Canada to grant Savoie exceptional status, only to get drafted by Prince George and then turn around and commit to the NCAA? Wright was granted exceptional status because he committed to playing for whatever team drafted him 100%. If Savoie would have done the same I think they would have done it. It's understandable why some would be mad and question the decision and it;s understandable why Savoie would not commit to playing for Prince George.
That roster is a bit of a tire fire. They need to be taking the best player available regardless of position or province. Well, the best player that will report.Geekie
He also needed exceptional status in order to play in the AJHL next year as a 15. It all sounds like his plan all along is to play college.
Sounds like it. It's not uncommon for first rounders to dictate where they will and won't play. Can't say I really blame them. Not sure I would want to play for teams that are consistently terrible to mediocre.Yeah I think the only way he was going WHL was if he got to play next year and went to a team he liked.
Many top 04's already going to the NCAA. Wonder what CHL can do.
I still don't know why the kids would burn their bridges in grade 9. But maybe they haven't and it is just a ploy to get on the team they want. The new trade rules allow players to request a trade once they turn 17, but not before.
I think you have to know what the player truly wants before you pick him. It's a huge risk to waste a high pick on one of these kids.
Koehn Ziemmer will be the steal of the draft. Mark my words
Hes a great pick but Im not sure a top five pick is a "steal".
And the other side is, how can an NCAA team forecast their roster 3 years in advance? Sure he is a "phenom" now, but in 3 years you might wish you hadn't reserved that spot for him.Wouldn't the bridge burning happen by signing with whl team prior to knowing you will play?
If you care about how high you are picked I guess an NCAA commit hurts you but if you care about who picks you and keeping a hand in your development plan then NCAA commit can help you. It can help a family guide the player to a team aligned with their goals.
The whole processed is messed up in my opinion. Families should be able to go one route or the other right up until after highschool. You want kids to go your way then be attractive to them... Don't lock them in like a cell phone plan.
And the other side is, how can an NCAA team forecast their roster 3 years in advance? Sure he is a "phenom" now, but in 3 years you might wish you hadn't reserved that spot for him.
I stopped buying WEHP. Kids moving up and down the ranks and off the list within weeks. How do rankings change biweekly anyhow?Do ppl still buy Western Elite Hockey Prospects ranks?
Yes !!!!! and it happens all the time, You never hear about it, since the kids parents are usually upset about it and do not go on Social Media to say , "My kid just got dropped from Yale for getting D's!!!" or for breaking curfew.In the NCAA they can de-committ a player at any time. There was something I read about how usually teams hold more "Committed" players on their roster than there is actually spots or scholarship money for. The argument is that only 25% of committed players actually "Commit". Essentially if the NCAA was forced to hold spots for committed players their rosters would be skinny, so the teams hold the rights to "Decommit" a player at any time for any reason as the commitment is only verbal and nothing is signed to begin with.
Yes !!!!! and it happens all the time, You never hear about it, since the kids parents are usually upset about it and do not go on Social Media to say , "My kid just got dropped from Yale for getting D's!!!" or for breaking curfew.
Coaches get fired or move on, Players get into trouble, grades, sometimes it too far away from home or the funding from the school gets adjusted. They could have you red shirt for a year or two, etc.. At least with the WHL its has some backbone. I saw one 97 get a ride to Alaska, then 6 months in , Thank you have a nice day, Yes you can stay and attend school, but you are not playing. Kid leaves and heads to U of Edmonton or Calgary, No free ride since it was NCAA. when you see 02's.03's and now 04's commit they dont get a 100% free ride, every school is different. Only 1 school in the NCAA is 100% free of cost. That is Air Force, However after hockey they have you for 7 Years. Some schools set the same funding for all players as U of Wisconsin you pay 30 they cover 70% every year. U of Boston is 50% 1st year 60% 2nd, 80% 3rd and 100% 4th. Yes some schools will offer certain players 80% Coverage, but you will need to be on the USA Development team or play hockey Canada U17,U18 and not be a screw up.
I do hear this all the time on blogs like this and around the rink. that free ride is not completly free??? My son has been approached by a few schools and I've talked with the coaches. all of them say free is free and that the full ride players have nothing to pay out of pocket other than plane rides home twice a year
who's correct in all this... I guess I'll know if/when he goes
Yes !!!!! and it happens all the time, You never hear about it, since the kids parents are usually upset about it and do not go on Social Media to say , "My kid just got dropped from Yale for getting D's!!!" or for breaking curfew.
Coaches get fired or move on, Players get into trouble, grades, sometimes it too far away from home or the funding from the school gets adjusted. They could have you red shirt for a year or two, etc.. At least with the WHL its has some backbone. I saw one 97 get a ride to Alaska, then 6 months in , Thank you have a nice day, Yes you can stay and attend school, but you are not playing. Kid leaves and heads to U of Edmonton or Calgary, No free ride since it was NCAA. when you see 02's.03's and now 04's commit they dont get a 100% free ride, every school is different. Only 1 school in the NCAA is 100% free of cost. That is Air Force, However after hockey they have you for 7 Years. Some schools set the same funding for all players as U of Wisconsin you pay 30 they cover 70% every year. U of Boston is 50% 1st year 60% 2nd, 80% 3rd and 100% 4th. Yes some schools will offer certain players 80% Coverage, but you will need to be on the USA Development team or play hockey Canada U17,U18 and not be a screw up.