I need to address this. This is a pathetic attempt to gaslight and I need to call you out.
Number One:
Still waiting for all your evidence that other teams wanted the kid so Johnny Hockey had to outsmart himself and move up.
And I'm glad your still not saying second round picks are useless.
You are saying I said 2nd round picks are useless. This is a lie. You're intentionally misrepresenting in a desperate attempt to poorly defend your bad opinion.
Number Two:
I never said he was a reach. I said you didnt need to give up a second to get him. It's too much draft capital . WHEN you could have just waited and if someone did draft the kid just take a Krebs or Caufield. That's pretty easy to understand.
You are saying that you never said he was a reach. This is a lie. You're intentionally misrepresenting in a desperate attempt to poorly defend your bad opinion.
Let's look at the first point from above:
My post original post on the 2nd rounders:
Do you know what the success rate is on mid-2nd round picks? Cherry picking two names, literally neither of whom are in the NHL, does not make your case. Most 2nd round picks are never worth a 2nd round pick again. Usually, the moment a team elects to burn a second on them, that represents the peak value they'll ever have as an asset. That's the most common outcome.
Your absurd defense that literally does nothing but support my statement 100%:
This from the TSN in canada:
Canada's The Sports Network (TSN) did a
similar analysis with similar results, looking at draft picks from 2000 to 2009. Based on that analysis, TSN concluded that 80 percent of first-round picks become at least low-level NHL players,
while 44 percent of those players selected in the second round make the NHL a career.
Is 56% usually? Is 56% most? That's what I thought. I was right and you were wrong. And yet you have this to say?:
And I'm glad your still not saying second round picks are useless.
You are saying I said 2nd round picks are useless. This is a lie. You're intentionally misrepresenting in a desperate attempt to poorly defend your bad opinion.
Where did I say 2nd round picks are useless? Gaslight attempt #1
FAILED. Go home and sleep it off.
Let's look at the 2nd point from above:
You never said he was a reach huh?
These are the type of guys Chyka misses out in going crazy for this swedish D nobody else was that high on.
What does that mean? If nobody was high on him and we took him early, is that not the definitely of a reach? How are you not saying he's a reach?
And yet we get this:
I never said he was a reach.
Hmmm...Gaslight attempt #2
FAILED.
Get your shit straight man.
Also - for the fifteenth time, his name is Chayka. Not Chyka.