cc
Registered User
- Feb 28, 2002
- 10,225
- 2,107
Liljegren was my pick for pog for Sweden as well.
Should have picked the Russian goalie
I hope Andersson is ok
Should have picked the Russian goalie
I hope Andersson is ok
I agree, I was surprised by that - he had an amazing game and kept Russia to OT hockey.Russian goalie should have got their player of the game.
I don't know if he was gassed at times, but Samorukov was a complete floater in overtime. It was embarrassing. Compete level was very low.
I'm okay with the Russia-US QF. But I'm not happy with what I am seeing from this team (as I've made clear).
I don't know if he was gassed at times, but Samorukov was a complete floater in overtime. It was embarrassing. Compete level was very low.
I'm okay with the Russia-US QF. But I'm not happy with what I am seeing from this team (as I've made clear).
That's what happens when the most talented players leave to Na. Their creative game is gone. Bragin doesn't help much either with his coaching style, although I respect it overallThis Russian team just sucks. End of story.
Boring robotic hockey. Not a single memorable creative play.
Huh, why would they need to lose? Would have been understandable if the USA finished 4th in their pool. But they absolutely want to win now that it would mean facing Slovakia.
Just to get that streak off their back? Sacrificing a QF against Slovakia for that would be dumb.
Russian goalie should have got their player of the game.
Thought both teams were pretty bad tbh, no edge to this game. When Lilgagran is awarded PoG you know you played badly.
Rubtsov... again with a below average game.
He was just average. He made some really good saves, as has been the standard for Russian goalies in the WJC in recent years, but he also let in some easy goals, especially the last one. For the most part, Russia played very evenly with Sweden, and if Sukhachyov could have made some big saves, they had a good chance to win. He didn't, and we didn't!
He was below average for this level. Period.I don't think anyone will agree with you on this. He was definitely not "just average" and he did in fact give the Russian team a chance to win. They just weren't good enough to get him the win.
He was below average for this level. Period.
So you watched only the goals?I just watched all three of the Swedish goals again and the goalie can't be blamed for any of them. The third goal you would hope that he would be able to hold on to the puck after the first shot so that one he could have done better but the big picture is that it was the D that blew it on that goal with brutal scrambling coverage. The D was absolutely putrid on goals 1 and 2; not the goalie's fault at all. Then there were the numerous saves he did make, stopping high quality chances. There are a number of reasons why Russia didn't get the job done last night but goaltending is not on that list.
So you watched only the goals?
I don't know if he was gassed at times, but Samorukov was a complete floater in overtime. It was embarrassing. Compete level was very low.
I'm okay with the Russia-US QF. But I'm not happy with what I am seeing from this team (as I've made clear).