hotcarle
Registered User
My nightmare is, knowing the Habs, Kotkaniemi and poehling become 3c with Eller - like upside, and zadina becomes kucherov.
The opposite is equally possible?My nightmare is, knowing the Habs, Kotkaniemi and poehling become 3c with Eller - like upside, and zadina becomes kucherov.
I'll bet anything that Zadina doesn't become anywhere near Kuch.My nightmare is, knowing the Habs, Kotkaniemi and poehling become 3c with Eller - like upside, and zadina becomes kucherov.
My nightmare is, knowing the Habs, Kotkaniemi and poehling become 3c with Eller - like upside, and zadina becomes kucherov.
McKeens is actual NHL scouts. I find their assessment has been far more accurate in the last 10 years i have followed them than any of the other media sources they have boots on the ground overseeing these youngsters. Industry standard. Zadina is going third.
Fair point. None of them have a crystal ball and can positively know what a player will become. I liked Zadina over Svetchnakov. I do believe he will get us 30+ goals. Its not his goal scoring i love most about him its his offensive iq. He goes to the next, he has a great sense of how the puck will come off and his positions himself accordingly. That being said i dont dislike Tkachuk but i like Zadina' play hes got an eye for the next the killer instinct. Coach can teach these guys to play dee but he cant teach them how to score. We already lost DebrincatOne of McKeen's main contributor over the last few years was Grant McCagg, who posted on this board not long ago and hasn't been actively involved with an NHL team in quite a while.
The McKenzie TSN poll is the agglomerate of different scouts that are actually employed by NHL teams.
You got it backwards. No only that, but list consensus don't mean anything come draft day. It gives a general outlook, but it's not a crystal ball. Plenty of teams have been rewarded for being bold on draft day in the past by reaching. Some got burned. Plenty of teams got burned by picking fallers on draft day. Some others got rewarded.
It's not a science. You don't really get to have an opinion if your opinion is entirely based on the list someone else came up with. Have you watched Zadina? Have you watched the half dozen of other kids that are possible picks at 3? If you haven't, like most of us here except for a select few draft junkies, I don't see why you'd be hell bent on selecting a certain player.
Kotkaniemi has way better offensive instincts and skills than Eller, he has top 6 skills thats for sure...My nightmare is, knowing the Habs, Kotkaniemi and poehling become 3c with Eller - like upside, and zadina becomes kucherov.
I can live with it if we draft Tkachuk. In no world is he BPA but he will be lots of fun to watch and as a player, I love the guy. Ginning and Groulx tho.. blehTkachuk
Ginning
Groulx
With the first 3 picks. Lets get it.
I'm worried about passing on Jan Jenik and he becomes the next JagrI'm worried about passing on Matej Pekar and he becomes the next Gretzky.
Fair point. None of them have a crystal ball and can positively know what a player will become. I liked Zadina over Svetchnakov. I do believe he will get us 30+ goals. Its not his goal scoring i love most about him its his offensive iq. He goes to the next, he has a great sense of how the puck will come off and his positions himself accordingly. That being said i dont dislike Tkachuk but i like Zadina' play hes got an eye for the next the killer instinct. Coach can teach these guys to play dee but he cant teach them how to score. We already lost Debrincat
Take this in perspective, most of them didnt have Kotkaniemi in the top 10 and now the guy is a top 3 without having play a single game since their last ranking... This should tell us something about the internet scouts
Literally tons of people had Kotkaniemi top ten, the vast majority actually.Take this in perspective, most of them didnt have Kotkaniemi in the top 10 and now the guy is a top 3 without having play a single game since their last ranking... This should tell us something about the internet scouts
This is actually factually incorrect. And Bob's list is by active NHL scouts. So keep peddling lies.
and where is the lie?
Take this in perspective, most of them didnt have Kotkaniemi in the top 10 and now the guy is a top 3 without having play a single game since their last ranking... This should tell us something about the internet scouts
He did play games. He played at the U-18. He also participated at the NHL combine which also has an impact on scouting rankings. And they aren't internet scouts but actual NHL scouts. So where is the truth in what you've said?
Uninformed people making strong comments always good for a laugh.
No, Bob McKenzie polls 10 NHL scouts and takes the average ranking. You sure are coming across as real informed ehThe truth is probably on your mouth only if its what you want to read. Kotkaniemi has raised even after the U18.... about the combine, it could be a reason for a 2nd rounder to raise in 1st, but shouldnt be a factor for the top 20. About Bob, he has sources, but makes his own ranking. From what I know, Bob Mackenzie know somes scouts like I also know one too. Am I a NHL scout?