I don't think the Rangers can just "void" his KHL contract. He's over there until their season is done and he's technically no longer under contract to them.
That’s not the case at all. Gorts can recall him to the rangers at any time, from there, I don’t know what happens. I don’t know if the recall voids the KHL deal which allows them to start from square one and send him to HartfordI don't think the Rangers can just "void" his KHL contract. He's over there until their season is done and he's technically no longer under contract to them.
How does he go from KHL All Star team to playing in the VHL
It’s sort of like their AHLI don’t even know what the VHL is.
I don’t even know what the VHL is.
Russia's equivalent of the AHL. That's the easiest way to describe it
I would imagine there's a clause in his contract that allows this....That’s not the case at all. Gorts can recall him to the rangers at any time, from there, I don’t know what happens. I don’t know if the recall voids the KHL deal which allows them to start from square one and send him to Hartford
except way worse. Ahlers don’t go play in the VHL as an equivalent
I would imagine there's a clause in his contract that allows this....
To be honest, I don't think he's as far along as people assumed he would be. I watched him during the Traverse tournament and I would say he was "average" at best, even giving him the benefit of the doubt with regard to getting used to the NA game, etc. IMO, he's a good year or two away. He also needs to bulk up a bit...he looked frail compared to the other players.I was initially fine with Kravtsov going back to Russia, and i guess i still kinda am.
However, at this point i'd like to see the Rangers bring him back. Give him a month or so as the 13F, just to practice with the squad and get properly caught up with stuff. Ideally, get him to spend time with Panarin. Give him the opportunity to earn his way into the lineup, and if it doesn't happen, send him to the AHL with a specific list of exactly what he needs to do to come back up. And make sure someone takes him under their wing in the AHL to make things easier.
One of the big things people had raved about prior to October was how good his attitude is. He's either a very good faker who fooled a lot of people, or is simply going through some tough times.
To be honest, I don't think he's as far along as people assumed he would be. I watched him during the Traverse tournament and I would say he was "average" at best, even giving him the benefit of the doubt with regard to getting used to the NA game, etc. IMO, he's a good year or two away. He also needs to bulk up a bit...he looked frail compared to the other players.
I agree wholeheartedly....however, I do think next season is iffy, but I would be very happy to be proven wrong.I don't think he's that far away, but i don't really see him as an NHLer this season, barring Massive improvement. I'd like to see him get a proper role on the 3rd line next year.
Not according to what you said above. You explicitly implied, he was not good enough period to make the team. Full stop. And you go on to incorrectly reason his performance down in Hartford backs up your claim, that he certainly was not good enough.I did NOT say "He was not good enough for even a fourth line role".
Obviously not as explained earlier.Your original quote is about top line roles/minutes specifically and I responded correctly to that.
Whatever happened down in Hartford is after the fact and is not evidence of why he was sent down. This should be fairly obvious.You also said I had no evidence. Well you yourself admit he was scratched in the AHL