broadwayblue
Registered User
Lol that’s because of this damn phone.
I know it’s couldn't care less.
It’s why I gave up trying to type moot point on this thing. You know how hard it is to keep changing it from mute?
It's moo point.

Lol that’s because of this damn phone.
I know it’s couldn't care less.
It’s why I gave up trying to type moot point on this thing. You know how hard it is to keep changing it from mute?
Lol that’s because of this damn phone.
I know it’s couldn't care less.
It’s why I gave up trying to type moot point on this thing. You know how hard it is to keep changing it from mute?
It's moo point.![]()
BTW, I'm not knocking character. I don't think it just means that that player is a nice guy. Or even a leader. It also means that you will work hard to improve which is extremely important in this business. The problem is that "character" is usually thrown around for players that are not as skilled as other players to make them look better than they are. No one was talking about Dahlin and Svechnikov's character. And also hockey culture is really up its own ass with it. A lot of people think that these intangibles are way more important than they are. Hockey fans have a romantic view of hockey that doesn't correlate to winning as much as they think. At least not in today's game.
P.S. As a Giants fan one of my favorite things about Saquon Barkley is his character. Having your head screwed on well is extremely important in sports. However, in the NHL as I said people usually use it for future 3rd and 4th liners to rationalize why they should be drafted top 10.
I think there’s a lot of truth to what you’re saying about the use of the term “character” and I agree that it can be a crutch.
But I also think it became a way to minimize the accomplishments of players who weren’t necessarily the highlight reel types.
I’m not sure we fully realize what some out of our top prospects did out there last year — and not just as passengers.
Andersson, Chytil, Howden, and others have accomplished some amazing things as teenagers and in their D-1, D-2 years. Character is mentioned with Andersson and Howden because they often served as leaders on their teams and in multiple situations across tournaments. They helped set tones for their teams and produced in big game situations against the best of their peers.
For whatever, we tend to overlook that a bit more than we probably should.
But notice how no one said anything about Chytil's character. Maybe he wasn't a leader on his teams, but I think character can be a personal motivation and work ethic too and he pretty clearly has it. But Chytil is a skilled guy that has through the roof upside while Andersson and Howden's upside is lower. If everything I hear is true about the latter two they can play on my team any day but I'll always go for a Chytil type rather than someone who is less skilled but has character. BTW, I was one of the few people that absolutely loved Andersson throwing his silver medal into the stands and I don't think that hunger to win is insignificant at all.
What does "community-minded" mean? I also don't think he's any more or less well spoken or loves his mom any more or less than any other draft choice. People are reading way too much into these interviews.
I am not sure why everyone hates the price we paid. When STL paid to trade up, there were only a few high end options on the board, hence the additional cost. The only thing up there when STL went was Lindkvist and Bokk (not even counting Wilde because he was passed over 8 more times after the 1st round).
BTW, I'm not knocking character. I don't think it just means that that player is a nice guy. Or even a leader. It also means that you will work hard to improve which is extremely important in this business. The problem is that "character" is usually thrown around for players that are not as skilled as other players to make them look better than they are. No one was talking about Dahlin and Svechnikov's character. And also hockey culture is really up its own ass with it. A lot of people think that these intangibles are way more important than they are. Hockey fans have a romantic view of hockey that doesn't correlate to winning as much as they think. At least not in today's game.
VERY few people are arguing that the NYR traded up for no reason. A lot of people suspect they could have moved up for a lot cheaper. Even if you are someone who feels K'Andre still would've been there without the trade you likely understand that the NYR thought he wouldn't be for whatever reason, including that they may have potentially heard something. Although why another team let everyone know what their upcoming pick would be, giving a team the chance to trade up in front of them, is beyond me. Maaaaaybe it leaked but a random source does not equal gospelSo...there WAS a reason Gorton traded up... Imagine that.
It's like a cow's opinion, it doesn't matter.
Hey. Do we know how K’Andre is pronounced? Is it “kon-dray”? Or “Kay-Ondray”? Or other?
Hey. Do we know how K’Andre is pronounced? Is it “kon-dray”? Or “Kay-Ondray”? Or other?
For the millenials:
![]()
VERY few people are arguing that the NYR traded up for no reason. A lot of people suspect they could have moved up for a lot cheaper. Even if you are someone who feels K'Andre still would've been there without the trade you likely understand that the NYR thought he wouldn't be for whatever reason, including that they may have potentially heard something. Although why another team let everyone know what their upcoming pick would be, giving a team the chance to trade up in front of them, is beyond me. Maaaaaybe it leaked but a random source does not equal gospel
For now, it's Can-Drai, but if he busts it changes to Can't-Drai