Hey guys, watched a lot of the US NTDP and he was my favorite defenseman there.
I actually hated his play at the start of the year and had concerns about IQ, but he progressed to the point he was a big standout most games by the end of the year.
He's a physical specimen. Powerful skater, big shot and is good both at transitioning and QB the PP. If you want to watch a game where his potential shines, go on youtube and watch the Russia v USA quarter finals.
Good call. For those interested:
1. One game of course but not hard to see why he was picked so far ahead of Wilde.
2. Definitely makes some bad reads at times (dropping back too far when opponents are carrying the puck in, bad angles to the boards that cause him to get beat) but also has the physical gifts to make up for them (quickly closing bad gaps, quickly moving laterally to stop players with a step on him, using his strength along the wall to pin players who beat him to the puck). If this is due to low time in position and not his overall hockey IQ (which I think is a fair guess) this could really improve at Wisco. If so NYR could end up with a perfect modern 2way/defensive dman (and maybe just maybe upside for more). Very good looking player moving the puck through the neutral zone with a pass or his legs.
I like the comparison, although it's easier to get past some of those issues as a winger than a D.
The thing with Kreider is that he's shown to be extremely coachable, even when he hates his coach (Tortorella). I get the sense, and it's only a sense, that Miller is too.
Yep. Had a feeling about that.
Makes the overpayment more bearable tbh, since he was "their guy" and they knew he was not going to be there at 26.
No way he would have lasted 4 more picks? Perhaps, perhaps not.
If he's your guy and you are in a Perhaps, perhaps not scenario you pull the trigger and get it done or your not doing what you are paid to do.
If he's your guy and you are in a Perhaps, perhaps not scenario you pull the trigger and get it done or your not doing what you are paid to do.
You (I think it’s you) keep pointing this out and everyone keeps ignoring it. Well, not to worry, my friend, *I* appreciate the point.It’s really not that much of overpayment. It just looks bad because Dubas panicked when the Rangers traded up for Miller and took much less to drop three spots.
He looks like such a nice young man.
Community-minded. Well spoken. Loves his Mom. Obviously kind and considerate.
I'm going to enjoy watching him smash the hell out of our opponents.
But I thought the narrative was that Dubas was the God of moving down in the draft, and every other GM in the league knows how to trade draft picks properly?It’s really not that much of overpayment. It just looks bad because Dubas panicked when the Rangers traded up for Miller and took much less to drop three spots.
What does "community-minded" mean? I also don't think he's any more or less well spoken or loves his mom any more or less than any other draft choice. People are reading way too much into these interviews.
You (I think it’s you) keep pointing this out and everyone keeps ignoring it. Well, not to worry, my friend, *I* appreciate the point.
He stated he wants to get involved in community outreach . To give back and improve communities. He made it sound like a priority. More than what I've heard from anyone else.
Unpopular opinion, considering our team just drafted this guy, but I've been saying this for months, and I'll stick to it. Reminds me of Sean Day without the character and work-ethic concerns. Hockey skills are way behind, maybe even non-existent. Sean Day, John Moore, Brady Skjei, something of that mold. Obviously they play that game to a variety of degrees. We hope he's more Skjei than Day. I think its overly optimistic though to think he'll be more Skjei than Day, based on where his game was at this season. He looked like a player who regressed more than anything, if I was to be honest.
I guess that's nice, people are still reading too much into these interviews.
I think it goes to character...something many organizations look for. Obviously that doesn't make up for a lack of talent....but it is a nice complimentary piece.
Unfortunately I think we turned “character” into a more or a slight around here in the last 12 months.
I’ve often pushed back that while some of our prospects certainly rely heavily on their makeup, they are far more skilled than we give them credit for.
Howden, Andersson, Miller, etc., these kids are all natural leaders who are very high character players. But let’s not overlook the skill either — they’re all very talented as well.
Each of them has led by example on the ice. Each of them has showed up to play in big game situations. Howden and Andersson especially have produced far better than we acknowledge.
I really could care less if these kids ever win a skills competition. I want them to play a successful style of NHL hockey. I don’t care if they score goals off their hips, their sticks or their ass — they all count the same.
Do we have our franchise player yet? Probably not.
But I also think we can’t let the quest for the perfect, or the better, stand in the way of the good or the very good.
Edge, my respect level for you went from 100% to 99.5%. You don't know how big of a pet peeve saying "could care less" is of mine.