darko
Registered User
- Feb 16, 2009
- 70,272
- 7,803
Hope he comes over and proves the haters wrong. He’s been hated since Pierre made the stupid racist comparison to Lindberg and Fast..
What did he say, exactly?
Nationalist? Idk what to use there lol.That's not racist though.
Nationalist? Idk what to use there lol.
But basically they said o a Swede what Swedes are on the rangers..
I think he means racist because he only used the two swedish players to compare him. Instead of some North American or Russian or insert other nationality or race similar player that more represents his style of play more for instance. I think that's what he means by racist.
All being said, I have seen enough of this kid to see what kind of skills he is working with. And he lacks skill, lacks speed, lacks size, lacks vision, has some hockey sense. He is going to be a long work in progress. Hopefully Chytil bails him out a little and comes along faster and distracts from this fact. He is never going to be a first line center. Which is the whole point of the top ten. If you are not getting a top center or wing you get a potential elite defender. You don't take a guy with less skill because you can't get him at 21. Idiotic.
Also, in regards to being 19. By the time a player is 18 you already know what skills he is working with. You can already tell who potentially is going to be a great offensive player and who is not. You can see those tools. The guys who blossom later are rarely offensive dynamic offensive players and more second line and below level talents. There are guys that go undrafted or low rounds and blossom later like MSL but they are very few and far between. Usually the cream is always selected at the very top and they are all 18 year olds when they are drafted.
To be fair, Andersson's game isn't THAT dissimilar to Quickie's. He just plays centre and has a top 6 offensive skillset (hopefully). But, no doubt, it was a lazy comparison by a poor analyst.
This is an overlooked issue with the team that I've only seen actual Frolunda fans discuss: Lundqvist is not a 1C and is being aksed to play that role.His biggest obstacle is that Joel Lundqvist is on that team. There is literally no way he will get to the first PP unit or center the first line unless Lundqvist is injured.
This is an overlooked issue with the team that I've only seen actual Frolunda fans discuss: Lundqvist is not a 1C and is being aksed to play that role.
He's always been a solid 2C and had a great year two years ago. But his play is slipping, and he shouldn't be the 1C on that team. I mean he's 35. Just like with Hank time catches up with us all.Lundqvist is the 1C based on his reputation, not based on his skill and what he shows on the ice.
He's always been a solid 2C and had a great year two years ago. But his play is slipping, and he shouldn't be the 1C on that team. I mean he's 35. Just like with Hank time catches up with us all.
This is an overlooked issue with the team that I've only seen actual Frolunda fans discuss: Lundqvist is not a 1C and is being aksed to play that role.
Lundqvist is the 1C based on his reputation, not based on his skill and what he shows on the ice.
I agree with you to some extent. He has been a 1C, and not "only" a solid 2C, you have to look at more than the numbers when it comes to evaluating Joel. He has been a physical presence as well as responsible defensively, making him a tough opponent to play against. Him being the 1C this year is not purely based on reputation, Joel and Lasch worked together in the past and there was nothing wrong with putting them together to begin this season as well. However, this season he has not played as well as before, not geting his game going offensively, and should probably be played in another role.He's always been a solid 2C and had a great year two years ago. But his play is slipping, and he shouldn't be the 1C on that team. I mean he's 35. Just like with Hank time catches up with us all.