Based on the list of players that was released...
Kuokkanen - Nättinen - Palmu
Tolvanen - Räsänen - Vesalainen
Luoto - Borgström - Koivula
Björkqvist - Mattila - Vidgren
Ruotsalainen
Juolevi - Saarijärvi
Välimäki - Heiskanen
Salo - Vaakanainen
Parikka
Kaarlehto
Vehviläinen
Ruusu
Very good D, mediocre forwards. This team really could've used both Saarela and Puljujärvi (I don't think the Oilers let Pulju play in the WJC). Goaltending is a huge question mark, coaching should be pretty good.
Just curious what is your benchmark of good forwards? Last year's team that had the best offensive depth ever? Because the forwards in this year's team are much better than 2014 for example. There's been maybe couple Finnish teams in WJC that had better forward depth than this one. It seems that last year has clouded some minds.
This year's competition. I have Canada, USA, Sweden and Russia all ahead of Finland, and the Czechs aren't that far away either. I'd say that's pretty mediocre.
This year's group has depth, sure, but it's severely lacking in high-end talent. It's a group of 8-9 middle-6 players, followed by a bunch of guys who just shouldn't be playing at this level. It's funny you should mention the 2014 team, because it is exactly what this team resembles, with the exception that there is no Teräväinen-level forward this time (possibly no Saros either, but we'll see).
This year's competition. I have Canada, USA, Sweden and Russia all ahead of Finland, and the Czechs aren't that far away either. I'd say that's pretty mediocre.
This year's group has depth, sure, but it's severely lacking in high-end talent. It's a group of 8-9 middle-6 players, followed by a bunch of guys who just shouldn't be playing at this level. It's funny you should mention the 2014 team, because it is exactly what this team resembles, with the exception that there is no Teräväinen-level forward this time (possibly no Saros either, but we'll see).
The defensemen project very well but if it's going to be mostly first-time draft eligible guys won't inexperience be a big issue? This is a 19 yo tournament.
Which is why we'll probably see one of the bottom spots go to some relatively safe, "boring" -97 born - like Rautanen or Parikka - over a flashier youngster all the stargazers are pining after.The defensemen project very well but if it's going to be mostly first-time draft eligible guys won't inexperience be a big issue? This is a 19 yo tournament.
Yeah, it only had Ristolainen, Lindell, Pokka and Honka.2014 had nothing on defense if compared to this years D..
This year's competition. I have Canada, USA, Sweden and Russia all ahead of Finland, and the Czechs aren't that far away either. I'd say that's pretty mediocre.
This year's group has depth, sure, but it's severely lacking in high-end talent. It's a group of 8-9 middle-6 players, followed by a bunch of guys who just shouldn't be playing at this level. It's funny you should mention the 2014 team, because it is exactly what this team resembles, with the exception that there is no Teräväinen-level forward this time (possibly no Saros either, but we'll see).
Is Jonne Tammela still hurt?
This team is too unexperienced and mediocre to cause any havoc but on tabloid pages at most - and for their subpar performing compared to their lofty predecessors.
If the coach Jock Iron Woods irons woods and woods irons then it might be a different matter. But...yeah that does not happen, not outside Europe or fantasy books thick as bibles and as full of mirages and miracles.
I consider it a job well done if they reach the quarters. You cannot do away with the fact written in screaming red letters as big as the ass of a hippo that The team is just a big MEH. No, not anybody's fault. Just the way it is this time around. So, it is time for some other bunch of vibrant kids to celly and tan in the shine of glory and glittering gold. These guys of lionage descent will bring back to Finland only experiences and some maple syrup in a jar if not the autograph of Patrick Laine on their sticks. Yikes.
That was... interesting. I enjoyed trying to decode that post, and I believe that after much thought, I have come up with the answer............. Illuminati confirmed!This team is too unexperienced and mediocre to cause any havoc but on tabloid pages at most - and for their subpar performing compared to their lofty predecessors.
If the coach Jock Iron Woods irons woods and woods irons then it might be a different matter. But...yeah that does not happen, not outside Europe or fantasy books thick as bibles and as full of mirages and miracles.
I consider it a job well done if they reach the quarters. You cannot do away with the fact written in screaming red letters as big as the ass of a hippo that The team is just a big MEH. No, not anybody's fault. Just the way it is this time around. So, it is time for some other bunch of vibrant kids to celly and tan in the shine of glory and glittering gold. These guys of lionage descent will bring back to Finland only experiences and some maple syrup in a jar if not the autograph of Patrick Laine on their sticks. Yikes.
^^^If you make a literal translation of that thing to Finnish, it actually becomes a rather coherent - not to mention amusingly written - opinion.
Yet I don't agree with said opinion at all.
Based on the list of players that was released...
Kuokkanen - Nättinen - Palmu
Tolvanen - Räsänen - Vesalainen
Luoto - Borgström - Koivula
Björkqvist - Mattila - Vidgren
Ruotsalainen
Juolevi - Saarijärvi
Välimäki - Heiskanen
Salo - Vaakanainen
Parikka
Kaarlehto
Vehviläinen
Ruusu
Very good D, mediocre forwards. This team really could've used both Saarela and Puljujärvi (I don't think the Oilers let Pulju play in the WJC). Goaltending is a huge question mark, coaching should be pretty good.
Last time Finland won when Finland had strong D. Although not having Teräväinen or Saros may be a difference maker if none of the players step up.