I wonder what number Barkov is going to use in the National team now that #16 is retired. It'll be weird to see him without #16![]()
That's the reason freezing Peltonen's number was so ridiculous. Best ever Finnish #16 can't wear his number.
I don't mean to disrespect, but why? Ilves already honored him, and rightfully so, but suffering a tragic fate should not be a reason for veneration everywhere, just because.For that case, i think only number which should be retired is Jarmo Wasama´s number on NT.
Little if any. Individual releases are still projected to take place. Behind that they still have good depth. I wouldn't worry about it.What is the effect of KHL not stopping the games to the Finnish team?
Behind that they still have good depth. I wouldn't worry about it.
I would count Jokipakka also NHL-level defenseman.Sorry.
We have 3 NHL level D in Finland. Maatta, Ristolainen and Vatanen. The rest is crap.
If all KHL players are out, Finland will field AHL scrubs and maybe Kukkonen from FEL. Fantastic tournament.![]()
I'm on mobile so I can't see your flag but if you're Finnish you have no excuse for this ignorance in regards to the Finnish team. Jokipakka is a solid NHL LEVEL defenseman. More embarrassingly those "AHL scrubs" you're talking about are Ville Pokka and Julius Honka. Pokka is the top Blackhawks defensive prospect and Honka would be the Star's if he weren't behind Esa Lindell. They're all top 10 defensemen in AHL scoring and I really don't think there's a Finnish KHL defenseman other than maybe Lepisto and Heitanen who would as good or slightly better than these top prospects. Perhaps Lajunen of the -15 +/-. Finland's defense is not Sweden's or Canada's, everyone knows this, but not having KHL players vs. having them is not going to make a big difference, and the news that came out today has zero affect on whether you will be able to get Lepisto or not.Sorry.
We have 3 NHL level D in Finland. Maatta, Ristolainen and Vatanen. The rest is crap.
If all KHL players are out, Finland will field AHL scrubs and maybe Kukkonen from FEL. Fantastic tournament.![]()
Actually I think at least Jaakola, Kukkonen and Salmela are front of Lajunen on our depth chart.Perhaps Lajunen of the -15 +/-.
I don't mean to disrespect, but why? Ilves already honored him, and rightfully so, but suffering a tragic fate should not be a reason for veneration everywhere, just because.
That being said, if there is one number that belongs up there for all services rendered, it's #14.
If one absolutely must, a case could also be made - with some consternation - to #17 and #8 (though I'd prefer not), on the merit of their careers as a whole, not just in the NT... but retiring #11, #16 and #26 was one of the most idiotic stunts by Liitto to date. Koivu, Peltonen and Lehtinen can't get enough respect, but by retiring them, Liitto set the bar awfully low. While they were arguably leading players of their own generation, they were not players whose achievements will surpass all generations.
In fact, you can fully expect that numbers like #9, #64 and others wrap up their careers with similar records, paragons of their own generations. And what then? Do they go up to the rafters too? Because if one intends to retire 3-4 numbers every 15 years, the future's heroes need to start wearing jerseys with three digits by the end of the ongoing century.
Not crap but they are still developing. We will probably need Lepistö and Kukkonen.Sorry.
We have 3 NHL level D in Finland. Maatta, Ristolainen and Vatanen. The rest is crap.
If all KHL players are out, Finland will field AHL scrubs and maybe Kukkonen from FEL. Fantastic tournament.![]()
My tone was derision hahaActually I think at least Jaakola, Kukkonen and Salmela are front of Lajunen on our depth chart.
Potentially losing Lepistö. That's all.What is the effect of KHL not stopping the games to the Finnish team?
You obviously haven't watched Lindell play lately. Calling him an "AHL scrub" is not doing him justice.So 3 players + Jokipakka (almost a player now).
Then AHL scrubs.
Well at least no worries for US to get shutout again.
However, the more important question here is this: Why do you deride? It's a gimmick tourney, not even international, there's little prestige in winning it. Even if they chose to feature half of our U20 defense there, it would matter little. Lindell, Lindbohm and Pokka will all be NHL regulars come 2018, and likely shoo-ins to the tournament that really matters (if we are to presume the league lets its players go, that is). And for them, featuring here would be nothing but beneficial when you think two years forward.
I'd buy this view if we didn't already have a direct point of comparison between these KHL "vets" and AHL "rookies". Namely, did you watch the last year's WHC?If we can't field a competitive D, then winning is not likely. 30yo 1D KHL vets > 22yo AHL rookies.
"Locks" in what manner, since your lineup excludes players already selected?My dream team, locks bolded