xxxx
Registered User
- Sep 20, 2012
- 5,480
- 0
No Phaneuf ever.![]()
I actually like him. If he was paired with some good overall d-man (Doughty, Pietrangelo) I think he would be fine. Mainly, he could be better in two years.
No Phaneuf ever.![]()
I actually like him. If he was paired with some good overall d-man (Doughty, Pietrangelo) I think he would be fine. Mainly, he could be better in two years.
No Phaneuf ever.![]()
Hall - Crosby - Stamkos
Tavares - Toews - MacKinnon
Benn - Getzlaf - Perry
Duchene - Bergeron - Carter
Keith - Weber
Subban - Pietrangelo
Bouwmeester - Doughty
Price
Crawford
Can't leave out Giroux this time around. He should be there in the 2016 World Cup.
Can't leave out Giroux this time around. He should be there in the 2016 World Cup.
It's going to be crazy finding room for Canada's forwards in 2016. For scorers you have guys like Crosby, Tavares, Stamkos, Getzlaf, Giroux, Perry, Seguin, Benn, Duchene, Hall, MacKinnon. Role players (term used liberally) like Toews, Bergeron, Couture, Carter, O'Reilly and so on. That's 16 forwards, without considering players who might emerge over the next two seasons. It's usually crazy for Canada (Giroux and Stamkos in 2014, Stamkos and St. Louis in 2010, etc.) but in 2016 it might be particularly difficult.
He has certainly earned it. After his slow start, he has been amazing.
For 2016 WC
Forwards
Hall-Crosby-Tavaras
*Drouin-Stamkos-St.Louis (if hes still around if not sub St.Louis for MacKinnon)
Perry-Toews-Getzlaf
ROR-Bergeron-Benn
extras: , RNH,Duchene,Monahan(I would love for him to be paired with Toews) Tyler Seguin and maybe Evander kane
Defense: (im matching left and right handed D, dear god the right side is crazy)
Doughty- Duncan Keith
Weber- Ryan Murray
Pietrangelo- Morgan Reily
Extras: PK Subban, Dougie Hamilton, Dion Phaneuf,Karl Alzner
Goalie
Price
Crawford
Luongo
extras: Holtby,Ward, Fluery, Smith
* For those bashing why Stamkos isn't on the top line i wanted to spread out the scoring and I'm also factoring chemistry as well. for McDavid its a bit too early id rather put him on 2018 Olympic team.
As for Morgan Reilly i wanted some new blood on the team (also its hard finding a left handed D).
Lastly what on earth gives the NHL the right to control an international sanctioned hockey tournament? I believe that international Hockey competition should fall under the jurisdiction of the IIHF. No world championships should be held in the same year as either Tournament (Olympics and World cup).
Just cause where Canadian
Hall - Crosby - Tavares
Mackkinon - Nugent-Hopkins - Stamkos
Duchene - Seguin - Drouin
Couture - McDavid - Eberle
Reinhart Toews
Subban - Pietrangelo
Keith - Doughty
Ekblad - Weber
Schultz Nurse
Price
Bernier
Subban
Drouin-Crosby-Stamkos (Stammer and Drouin rip it up and hard to separate)
Hall-Tavares-MacKinnon (Hyped 1st overalls, All with great gifts)
Giroux-Toews-Seguin (Mix and match line, no denying the talent)
Benn-Getzlaf-Perry (Makes too much sense to roll out this line)
Bergeron (duh)
Keith-Weber (easy)
Doughty-Pietrangelo (easier)
Subban-Ekblad (?? pairing, lots of time and it will tell ALOT!)
Murray
Price
Bernier
Mason
I'd like to echo that sentiment. The only leafs player who gets my vote is Bernier...but I imagine he'll be nursing that injury for most of the summer.
Morgan Rielly has a significantly better chance to make it than Phaneuf.
Canada is going to tear **** up. We have more top players now than we had in the late 90s and early 2000s. Every other country is falling into a generation gap (Except for Sweden's defense and Finland's goaltending because they are pretty amazing) while Canada's under 25 talent is startling. I think Canada will be relatively stronger in 2018 than ever before in the NHL Olympic era.
Yes, I agree that a 2018 team would look different. Doughty should unquestionably be the #1 defenceman, and both Weber and Keith should have regressed to a degree. By that time Canada will still have a Crosby/Toews core, but Tavares should easily be the next option. I suspect they will be loyal to Getzlaf, right or wrong, but there are any number of qualified replacements.
There are a few candidates. Murray, Rielly, Hamilton all seem to have a lot of potential. It's just potential though. Canada has been producing a lot of first round defencemen, but they mostly seem like a bunch of high end #2 defencemen. Sweden has Brodin and Lindholm, while USA has Trouba and Jones (with potentially great defencemen still undrafted). Canada has been ok with defencemen, but really should be able to stay ahead of the competition. On the bright side, guys like Weber and Keith were not elite until their mid 20s, so there is plenty of time for someone to emerge.
I feel like you're forgetting or possibly underestimating Pietro? I really feel like he is a legit #1 defenseman, who has no problem playing on any ice surface. There are lots of times I think he can be every bit as good as Doughty. He had a different job in Sochi, but he can certainly be given a more offensive task if need be. I really don't see any other country with a top 2 that good.
Maybe that's just me though.
...l think hot-housing our talent is the way to go...
.
...: Our kids deserve to know what it feels like to win at the U17s and U18s.
...I admire the Swedish development model, even if I dislike Swedish Schadenfreude, anti-Canadian posters, and self-righteousness. I think they have a marvellous system in place for maximizing skill development. Frankly, they are far and away the dominant power in European hockey right now.