UsernameWasTaken
Let's Go Hawks!
wow! Sweden gets its first win and eliminates the US. I wasn't expecting that one.
I love how this tournament is always pretty wild.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4d62/f4d62cb829ad39d63881c47ec42cf6cbead9e846" alt="nod :nod: :nod:"
I love how this tournament is always pretty wild.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4d62/f4d62cb829ad39d63881c47ec42cf6cbead9e846" alt="nod :nod: :nod:"
Sorry, who are the semifinals pairings?
Team Canada Black has been a massive disappointment, especially considering they have three first overall picks on the team.
I honestly couldn't tell if Levin even played in the third period or much of the game at all, he was that invisible. Bowers and Matteos were also poor.
The only player that showed why he was picked high was Veleno.
You know, going into the tournament Team Red was not really the best team on paper, but they've yet to lose, and a big reason for that is the play of Comtois, Teasdale, and Morand with 7,6, and 5 pts respectfully (yes Studnicka and Bellerive are doing good as well), Comtois especially, is leading the tournament in assists, and seems to factor in on almost every goal, he's also over a ppg in the Q so he seems like on of the top '99 players in Canada so far.
It will also be interesting to see the developing comparison between Veleno and Svechnikov.
Not surprised the US team lost this one. They were sloppy defensively, took too many penalties and couldn't get the power play on track all tournament long. Combine that with the fact the Swedes played a much stronger defensive game than previous US opponents and this is what you get. Congrats to them.
It's too early to say anything definitively but I was not as impressed with a number of the more highly touted US players as I'd hoped to be. I'll refrain from naming names but I think there's a decent chance we don't see any of these players taken in the top part of the 2017 draft's first round.
1:6 again...
I mean, shots were close, what was the difference? Goalie? Defense? Dissapointed, not even by the fact we lost but because the score looks so bad. In 5 games of the tournament (Including preliminary one against Finland) the overall score is 14:25. That's just really bad.
Honestly it's hard to say what's gone wrong because they played so well still! Skarek was good. Defence still looked good.
I think the main issue, specifically with this game and against the Americans, was that they went down early. So they've had to take chances going forward (defence especially) and got caught on the break. Russians were very fast and so was U.S.A.
Possession-wise? Czechs dominated Russia for most of the 2nd and 3rd periods. They just couldn't score. Couldn't get it by the Russian goalie (who had the game of his life) and when they did? They hit the post. Just bad luck all around for them this tournament. That combined with a horrid power play. 0 goals all tourney on the power play.
But I'm still very impressed with this group.. I've never seen a Czech team with more heart then these guys. Even when down 4-1, the whole bench was standing up and banging their sticks on the boards, as the Czechs put on pressure, urging their teammates on. They battled extremely hard. It was quite the site to see. Still very proud and fully expect this age group to be medal contenders in world juniors going forward. No doubt..
Not taking anything away from Russia. They still deserved the win I guess, but boy... That score is just wack.
I have no idea who is supposed to be a top player or not, but I was at almost every USA game and despite the upset, they were an excellent team overall.
I thought the blueliner Gildon really stood out personally. Dhooge was really good as well but he'll need to put on several more inches and about 50 more pounds...haha.
Finland wins 5-4 in overtime.
Tolvanen didn't break, Kovalchuk's goal record but however he was Finland's best player.
Lets wait and see, what he can do in U18 WJC's next April.