Despite all my attempts to be objective, I've always had a bit of a soft spot for Ruutu. He's had bad seasons before, yet been solid when's the time come to don the blue-and-white. What I've seen of him this season, I'm yet again not entirely certain if we can fault him being in the doghouse entirely on his abilities.
Therefore, I suppose I wouldn't mind if they had him, and wouldn't mind that either if KJ and co just went nuts and placed him in the top units. His history speaks for him, and I'm willing to excuse him based on that - at least until the present day turns against him. Of course, that'd suck for guys like Hartikainen and Osala who also really deserve to be in the team. They've got some fresh showings and have worked their backsides off to display them, so to have someone rob their spot based on mostly his name and old merit would be a bit harsh.
However, as it was pointed out, there might just be room for a bit more than usual grinder complement - since many of them can be used to balance out the top lines as well. At least Ruutu, Korpikoski, Komarov, Hartikainen and Osala could all be used in such a manner. It's quite easy really to fit them all in the lineup.
Ruutu - Barkov - Jokinen
Korpikoski - Kontiola - Aaltonen
Salminen - Immonen - Osala
Komarov - Wirtanen - Hartikainen
That's actually a pretty balanced squad with some finish in all of the lines despite looking a bit grind-heavy at first. The difference to last year is that most of the guys Erkka picked did NOT have the necessary offensive flair on top their usual physical abilities. Out of those, only Pakarinen was able to answer that call.
Can somebody who saw those Swiss games tell me is Jalonen for real about Kontiola or is he talking out of his ass?
There were some flashes I suppose, but can't say I really saw anything that would justify a slot. Maybe just enough to deserve some extra rope. In his defense though, he was playing in a line with Huhtala and Pihlström, who are not really guys who complement his playstyle. With the new additions, he should be back together with JMA and somebody else more skilled, so we should have better image in a week or two.
How about AHL-players who's season is over soon ?
Michael Keränen
Joel Armia
example ? We could use Keränen's skill and creativity, cuz we have tons of hard-workin attackers, but pure stickhandlers not so much
Both Minnesota and Winnipeg may end up in the playoffs however, so it's entirely possible said players are going to end up hanging around the big clubs as a Black Ace. And if they don't, well... that's really not an indicator they've had a good season and therefore puts a question mark on their usefulness for the NT as well. Bit of a catch-22.
Armia was good on the first half with the Amerks, but has regressed quite a bit since his trade. Not that I'd mind if the Nose decided to take a chance with him anyway, but I can also see why he'd pass.
And we DO have quite a bit of stickhandling wingers even without Keränen, actually. Salminen, Aaltonen, Donskoi, Enlund and possibly J.Jokinen too. Even all of them won't make the cut, so adding Keränen would be a bit redundant if anything. Which, in reference to my preceding comment about the grinders, could mean that there is a fair opportunity to build the team by filling it with somewhat seasoned skill rather than muscle. Erkka obviously balked at Teräväinen and Keränen last year because he felt uncomfortable with their relative freshness (which he shouldn't have, IMO) - Jalonen can't use the same excuse because he should be far more aware what the players available to him are capable of.