Thanks, great find.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQjcRrTcY80#t=1671
Japan vs Korea
Live stream hosted by the Korean broadcast for those interested.![]()
Thanks, great find.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQjcRrTcY80#t=1671
Japan vs Korea
Live stream hosted by the Korean broadcast for those interested.![]()
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQjcRrTcY80#t=1671
Japan vs Korea
Live stream hosted by the Korean broadcast for those interested.![]()
Do you know, are they showing every Korean game?
P.S. Man these announcers are tense![]()
Austria and Slovenia i would say about 50/50.. Austria a bit more since they get promoted even if they win and Japan loses.
Lets hope so...I'd say Slovenia definitely has an edge.
Here are the number of Canadian and US trained players on each of those "Italian" teams in Pool A:And what is your point? Why are we talking about the 2007 U-20 championship? How is that relevant?
Italy has been a part of the A Pool/Elite tier for a number of generations.
This is why there should be a limit on naturalized players. Max 1 per team.Here are the number of Canadian and US trained players on each of those "Italian" teams in Pool A:
1982 (18), 1983 (16), 1992 (18), 1993 (16), 1994 (14), 1995 (14), 1996 (15), 1997 (13), 1998 (12), 1999 (11). 2000 (7), 2001 (11), 2002 (7), 2006 (6), 2007 (9), 2008 (9), 2012 (10)
And at the Olympics:
1984 (11), 1992 (17), 1994 (14), 1998 (14), 2006 (11)
Thanks ravenclaw2099 you made my day. I've been wanting to get a good look at both the South Korean and Japanese teams for a long time.![]()
I really want to see Japan promoted. As long as they win I think they'd be fine?
Yes, a win of any kind will get them in. A loss of any kind will depend on the Austria/Slovenia match as they hold tie-breaker against Slovenia but not Austria.
If both Japan and Slovenia win in overtime it would be a 3-way tie in which case I think Japan would be 3rd because they have the worst goal differential.
In the case of them all finishing with 11pts, the direct match table looks like this...
Austria 4pts (3 from Japan, one from Slovenia)
Japan 3pts (3 from Slovenia, zero from Austria)
Slovenia 2pts (2 from Austria, zero from Japan)
Goal difference would only come into play should they have all finished with 3pts each, then you would probably be correct as Japan is at -2, Slovenia would have to really route Austria for them to switch.
Oh yeah, didn't consider the different head-to-head points. You're right of course, apologies.
And what is your point?Here are the number of Canadian and US trained players on each of those "Italian" teams in Pool A:
1982 (18), 1983 (16), 1992 (18), 1993 (16), 1994 (14), 1995 (14), 1996 (15), 1997 (13), 1998 (12), 1999 (11). 2000 (7), 2001 (11), 2002 (7), 2006 (6), 2007 (9), 2008 (9), 2012 (10)
And at the Olympics:
1984 (11), 1992 (17), 1994 (14), 1998 (14), 2006 (11)