Get outta here with that Ryane Clowe mess. He can't even spell his first name right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Classic Devil
Clowe scored what, two goals all of last season? Please.
That's pretty short-sighted. He did score 3 goals last year (in 12 games with the Rangers). Remember he was in a pretty crappy situation with SJ, and he scored 0 in 28. He wasn't happy there.
Prior to last year here are his goal totals / games played:
2011: 17 / 76
2010: 24/ 75
2009: 19 / 82
2008: 22 / 71
vs Clarkson
30, 12, 11, 17 the last 4 years. Which one is not like the others?
Clarkson showed incredible luck and inconsistency last year with his scoring. The rest of their games are pretty similar, Clowe is more skilled.
Clowe is just as good as Clarkson I see him as a 40-55 pts winger.
Clowe is just as good as Clarkson I see him as a 40-55 pts winger.
Would we be able to afford Horton and Stalberg?
Would we be able to afford Horton and Stalberg?
1) no hes not
2) thats a BIG difference. 40 points and 55 pts are vastly different
1) no hes not
2) thats a BIG difference. 40 points and 55 pts are vastly different
I sincerely understand and respect how loyal Devils fans are to David Clarkson. I understand that that loyalty can cloud judgement and, full disclosure, I've never been much of a fan of David Clarkson's game. He's a poor skater, has a poor shot, has poor vision, and makes his living being a grinder. I cheer for the guy because I respect his game and how he consistently leaves it all on the ice.
But he's not a 30 goal scorer. That's not who he is. He may barely be a 20 goal scorer. He's a liability on offense more than anything.
Ryane Clowe is just a better player than David Clarkson and will come considerably cheaper. I say take advantage of the fact that people are going to focus on his 3 goals last year and get him on the cheap for 3-4 years. There's no way Clowe is scoring 6 goals next year. Last year was his first single digit goal output of his career (16 is the prior low).
Looking at his last 5 seasons. Point totals 52, 57, 62, 45, 19(projects to 38 over full season).
What do you consider Clarkson?
Last 5 season: 32, 24 (hurt half the year), 18 (terrible team), 46 (career peak), 24 (projects to 41).
I would figure Clarkson would be good 35 - 50 range. It is telling how few assist Clarkson gets.
I keep on forgetting about Weiss. I wonder Pete wants him to be the LW to Zajac - Kovy line.
Plus, a few of those Clowe numbers are from a SJ Sharks team that was the best run and gun offense in the league.
Clarkson has been better of late.
Clowe is a better all-around player. Clarkson is a better niche player. Clarkson gives the Devils a dynamic they lack, while Clowe just fits right in with guys like Zubrus.
I'd rather someone like Bouchard who gives us something we lack, instead of Clowe.
Weiss is a center.
HEnrique would move to winger if we got Weiss.
I know he is a center but I figure that maybe Pete would move him to play LW with Zajac and Kovy.
Weiss - Zajac - Kovalchuk
Breire - Elias - Zubrus
???? - Henrique - Bernier
Carter - Jayo - Gionta
you forgot Loktionov
Here's my post:
You either believe that Ryane Clowe regressed immensely in the scoring department (ignoring his pretty solid scoring with the Rangers) or you believe last year might have been the exception and not the rule (that's my opinion).
I would expect a higher goal output from Clowe. I know Clarky has had two pretty solid years but watching him play every night has me firmly believing that he's pretty damn lucky on the vast majority of his goals. When the other shoe drops I expect Clarky to be the player he was before his 30 goal season and Clowe to be the player he was before last year.
Their intangibles are nearly identical. Clowe is nails.
http://www.inlouwetrust.com/2013/6/...LWT's chart. So there's food for thought too.