Is that the NHL's proposal? Or just an opinion.
According to ESPN that is the NHL's newest proposal.
Is that the NHL's proposal? Or just an opinion.
LOL of course.
Fehr counters with: No contract term-limits. Demands $400 million make-whole, and unrestricted free-agency at age 23 with a 5 year CBA coupled with a PA option to terminate in years 3, 4, and 5But still has the balls to claim he "worked off" the NHL's offer, and is negotiating in good faith
Is that the NHL's proposal? Or just an opinion.
If the cap drops to 60 million and they want to re-sign Hagelin, Stepan, McDonagh, Sauer and Del Zotto and keep them, there is no way to do that without making a significant cap move.
I think we are all forgeting one key factor here.....THE ABILITY TO TRADE FOR CAP SPACE
You have to figure that the Rangers will be in on that if they need to in order to keep the team together.
I think we are all forgeting one key factor here.....THE ABILITY TO TRADE FOR CAP SPACE
You have to figure that the Rangers will be in on that if they need to in order to keep the team together.
Woah, I must have missed that. If that is the case that would be sweet.
i guess this is pretty much the last chance for a season, right? this offer...
Right. Because the last pa offer didn't touch ufa age, had an 8 year cba, 8 year cap on contracts, a variance cap, and no counter on make whole. Pretty rational post. Kudos
When healthy,Gaborik is unquestionably the superior player.
One of the biggest knocks people had on Gaborik was his inability to play seamlessly with Richards, after having no true #1 center his whole career. Nash is coming here in a similar situation and, quite frankly, I don't expect his production to magically explode with Broadway Brad either.
Nash was brought here to provide enough additional scoring to win us a cup. Not to be the #1 goal scoring threat. That is Marian's job.
Gaborikis one of the top 5 goal scoring threats in the league. As of right now, Nash is #12, maybe #11 is you're being harsh to Bobby Ryanafter a bad year.
I think when it all comes down to it they're gonna have to sit, and make some tweaks. Kinda like they did in New York a few weeks ago when it really looked like progress was made.To date: Fehr keeps receiving improved offers so he is improving the PA's position by waiting and not initiating.
If the season is cancelled or if the players pay too much for their ultimate return then Fehr might have erred?
As of now the owners seem to be pushing more for a settlement (Perhaps they need the season more or are covering their position for any possible lawsuits) so it's too early to judge the results.
Fehr is simply playing a calculated positions and negotiating the way he believes is best.
What I'm saying is get in the room with each other. Read the proposals. Tell the owners what you like, and don't like. The best I've seen was the marathon sessions a few weeks ago. Not writing up a whole new counteroffer after a day. Get in the room, tell them the things you don't like, and that you'd like to bend on. As has already been said we know they've been stalling anyway. It's gonna come down to them having to do this though if they don't wanna cancel the season. I'm not quite sure what Fehr has planned though.How is presenting a counteroffer not negotiating? And why must the players work off the owners' proposal?
Nash and Gaborik are so different its ridiculous. Both bring different aspects to their team, both are effective.
Id rather make some cuts elsewhere than to lose Gabby.
The PA proposed trading for space in August. It would have been very limited.
It wasn't in their November proposal.
Bettman wasn't going for that. Its not in the NHL proposals.
If the cap is set at 60 million the Rangers will be quite a bit over that if they re-sign and keep all of their current players (Hagelin, Stepan, McDonagh, Sauer). The only real viable option would be to trade Gaborik. IMO that is the better route than trading Girardi or Staal although that may be an option they would have to look at after dealing Gaborik considering the raises some of these players would be looking at.
Shouldn't there be a rollback with the cap going down like that? Or is the buyout supposed to be the answer? I think they'll meet in the middle somewhere. Maybe a $63 million cap ceiling.
It is going to be extraordinarily difficult to get a nice package and clear significant cap space.
64 million would be enough to keep Gaborik
Why can't they just keep the cap where it is and not increase it until the owners are made whole on the 50-50 revenue split?