notbias
Registered User
- Feb 16, 2017
- 12,282
- 10,190
Based on what? Contracts signed back in 2010?
The Matthews deal was a simple one. At the time, he was better than Eichel and clearly below McDavid. Eichel signed for 10 x 8 and McDavid for 12.5 x 8
We got Matthews in the middle for cap hit which makes sense, but only at 5 years, not 8. That's a big difference because at 5 years he enters UFA at peak age. And we also gave him top signing bonuses, and gave him a NMC in his final year. He got everything possible at a time when he shouldn't have. A couple rockets, a lindsay and an MVP later he's going to understandably gouge our eyes out
He is closer to Eichel than McDavid based on CH%, so sure 8 years probably adds a million or more to his cap which they didn't want to do, so that seems fair to me.
Contracts back in 2010 are still valid when there are so few players on Matthews' level, he is a step behind McDavid and two ahead of Eichel.