The low SOG don't really bother me as much, we had been racking up fewer shots on the winning streak and we were winning those games.
Honestly, our SOG totals were always a little skewed and inflated because we tended to settle for too many shots from distance that were of little scoring threat.
Being optimistic here, but I'm not hardly as upset about this as I probably should be. First game back from the break against a pretty good divisional opponent we've struggled against all year and a goaltender whose absolutely had our number, and it still came down to the wire and honestly could have gone either way. I think (or hope) they'll be fine.
Preds played hard tonight. In my opinion, they didn't generate many great scoring opportunities but neither did the Blues.
Regardless, I like how in the last minute of the game when we need to score we put someone in front of the net.
How about a body in front of the net at all times when we set up in their zone?
In a discussion with Flyers fans they say PL is responsible for the Simmonds in front of the net experiment that has worked quite well. Makes me wonder why he has not found someone here to do the same. Maybe we do not have the player with the right skill set or one willing??????????
There are three players with the size or the grit on this team to play that role Watson, Nystrom and Gaustad. The rest are smurfs or do not have the guts to get into the dirty area. Have to give Johanson, Neal and Forsberg a pass though since there the only three on the team with any type offensive talent for putting the puck in the net.
I said from the beginning of the year I thought that's what oughtta' happen with Watson - he's not just got size, he has decent hands - and that Holmstrom guy did ok without a whole lot more than that.
We also have a few others - given how father-time as slowed Fish down, parking him in front on the PP makes good sense. Can't do that with him having to C his line, though, but if we could skate him as a wing on the 2nd he could fill that mucker roll there, too.
Willy should be put there and told to figure it out, if he ever gets healthy. And Salo, while undersized, certainly is gritty enough - Horny isn't the biggest guy and he's done ok.
We have candidates, it's as if the staff just hasn't figure it out or can't get the guys to do it.
The more I'm thinking about it having John Scott on our team might not be a bad thing.
The love affair with John Scott would end after about his second game. Once we saw how truly slow he was and how little he could accomplish when it's 5-on-5, not 3-on-3 in an all-star game, we'd be bemoaning whatever length contract we gave him.
I like the guy, but he's a McGratten.
So true. Why not hire him to replace Stu though?
So true. Why not hire him to replace Stu though?