Toggle sidebar

Post-Game Talk: 1st place once again, Jets win 5-2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ggg99

Ggg99

Registered User
Sep 17, 2018
1,888
5,547
And it turned out nice again.

Nice win. First in the Central.

And a nice tribute to a nice man.

57567489-45BB-444A-AF27-DD204ECE8F90.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: BoneDocUK, B33R LEAGUE, chaos4 and 16 others
John Agar

John Agar

The 4th Hanson Bro'
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
25,810
42,710
Winnipeg, Manitoba
schism
[ˈs(k)izəm]

NOUN
  1. a split or division between strongly opposed sections or parties, caused by differences in opinion or belief:
    "the widening schism between so called leaders and real players... Vezina players..." · "the persistence of this Helle' could produce schism within PoMo's room

    tenor.gif
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: chaos4, ps241, macmaroon and 10 others
surixon

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
50,496
73,812
Winnipeg
This is a good example of the short falls of advanced stats. The Panthers where much better then us according to the stats but not by my eye test. Almost all of the Panthers "good chances" came head on with Helle set and seeing it. I don't care who you are you aren't beating a goalie of Helle's caliber on a shot he is set for and can see. It puts into context why Florida has good numbers but sub par finish. Maurices disdain for the seam pass is going to hurt his team. Meanwhile we made the goalies move on our goals and as a result imo we not only had the more dangerous chances but also scored more goals.

Helle was very good.

Top pairing was matched with our third line most of the game and did a solid job.

Second pairing with another strong game, like how Pionk's playing. Dillion just doing his job.

Third pairing, some hiccups with puck control from this duo but was generally pretty good.

Top line: I thought the lines timing was a bit off through two periods but started clicking again in the third. They aren't going to be on every night but I liked that even when a bit off they didn't give up much of anything defensively and still had the larger share of good looks.

Second line: It was the Dubois and Conner show, excellent night from both of them. Mike took a bit to get comfortable but by the third was back to doing the things he does well. Glad to see this line heat up, the top line wasn't going to continue to shoot at 15% forever.

Third line: They were decent but once again didn't generate much and had a hard time in their end. I get it's a bit of a makeshift line due to injuries but I'm not sure I like them as a hard match line. I'm also not sure I like our best offensive dmen behind them.

Fourth line was ok but didn't play much. Gus was fairly invisible and Gagner looked slow out there. I think he sits next game.

Special teams were both good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FinJetster, DannyGallivan, BoneDocUK and 19 others
Tom ServoMST3K

Tom ServoMST3K

In search of a Steinbach Hero
Nov 2, 2010
27,868
18,739
What's your excuse?
surixon said:
This is a good example of the short falls of advanced stats. The Panthers where much better then us according to the stats but not by my eye test. Almost all of the Panthers "good chances" came head on with Helle set and seeing it. I don't care who you are you aren't beating a goalie of Helle's caliber on a shot he is set for and can see. It puts into context why Florida has good numbers but sub par finish. Maurices disdain for the seam pass is going to hurt his team. Meanwhile we made the goalies move on our goals and as a result imo we not only had the more dangerous chances but also scored more goals.

Helle was very good.

Top pairing was matched with our third line most of the game and did a solid job.

Second pairing with another strong game, like how Pionk's playing. Dillion just doing his job.

Third pairing, some hiccups with puck control from this duo but was generally pretty good.

Top line: I thought the lines timing was a bit off through two periods but started clicking again in the third. They aren't going to be on every night but I liked that even when a bit off they didn't give up much of anything defensively and still had the larger share of good looks.

Second line: It was the Dubois and Conner show, excellent night from both of them. Mike took a bit to get comfortable but by the third was back to doing the things he does well. Glad to see this line heat up, the top line wasn't going to continue to shoot at 15% forever.

Third line: They were decent but once again didn't generate much and had a hard time in their end. I get it's a bit of a makeshift line due to injuries but I'm not sure I like them as a hard match line. I'm also not sure I like our best offensive dmen behind them.

Fourth line was ok but didn't play much. Gus was fairly invisible and Gagner looked slow out there. I think he sits next game.

Special teams were both good.
Click to expand...

Score effects are so strong in hockey, I really hope every advanced stat makes some allowance for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adam da bomb, Guardian17, Ginger Papa and 1 other person
Ginger Papa

Ginger Papa

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 21, 2019
15,440
72,547
Quesnel, B.C.
surixon said:
This is a good example of the short falls of advanced stats. The Panthers where much better then us according to the stats but not by my eye test. Almost all of the Panthers "good chances" came head on with Helle set and seeing it. I don't care who you are you aren't beating a goalie of Helle's caliber on a shot he is set for and can see. It puts into context why Florida has good numbers but sub par finish. Maurices disdain for the seam pass is going to hurt his team. Meanwhile we made the goalies move on our goals and as a result imo we not only had the more dangerous chances but also scored more goals.

Helle was very good.

Top pairing was matched with our third line most of the game and did a solid job.

Second pairing with another strong game, like how Pionk's playing. Dillion just doing his job.

Third pairing, some hiccups with puck control from this duo but was generally pretty good.

Top line: I thought the lines timing was a bit off through two periods but started clicking again in the third. They aren't going to be on every night but I liked that even when a bit off they didn't give up much of anything defensively and still had the larger share of good looks.

Second line: It was the Dubois and Conner show, excellent night from both of them. Mike took a bit to get comfortable but by the third was back to doing the things he does well. Glad to see this line heat up, the top line wasn't going to continue to shoot at 15% forever.

Third line: They were decent but once again didn't generate much and had a hard time in their end. I get it's a bit of a makeshift line due to injuries but I'm not sure I like them as a hard match line. I'm also not sure I like our best offensive dmen behind them.

Fourth line was ok but didn't play much. Gus was fairly invisible and Gagner looked slow out there. I think he sits next game.

Special teams were both good.
Click to expand...
Always appreciate your analysis @surixon

81B8E9BB-A050-45D7-8DE6-B33DD43855A2.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: DannyGallivan, chaos4, Jets 31 and 8 others

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
22,913
28,202
Tom ServoMST3K said:
Score effects are so strong in hockey, I really hope every advanced stat makes some allowance for them.
Click to expand...
Of course there is. It's no different to football and qbs or receivers padding their stats in garbage time.
 

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
22,913
28,202
Buffdog said:
As long as they aren't spectacularly bad, I'm OK with that
Click to expand...
They barely play and usually 10 mins or less for a reason. They're ineffective. I didn't think we could get less offense from previous 4cs (ie Thompson, Toninato) but here we are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom
X