Proposal: - 1st Overall to Flames. | Page 2 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Proposal: 1st Overall to Flames.

I think you are really underappreciating how close Misa and Schaefer are. Maybe the islanders pick Schaefer first, and the Sharks would too, but the rest of the top 5 would probably take Misa first
Obviously if you want a forward you take a forward but if you ask 32 NHL teams probably 30 will tell you Schaefer is a better prospect
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatass

Attachments

  • IMG_0229.jpeg
    IMG_0229.jpeg
    54.5 KB · Views: 1
  • Like
Reactions: Fatass
Like usual? Lol ok Lunatik

I guess scoring the most points in your draft year in 16 years and being a dominant 2-way player means nothing?

I love all these non-scouts on this site that "know better" because they've watched Schaefer play how many games over the last 6 months? Right zero
Yes, like usual. You often get these half baked thoughts and you cling onto them. As you're doing here by making those bullshit comments about us not thinking his numbers matter. Schaefer is very clearly the consensus #1 to anyone paying any attention.

The irony of your comment about non-scouts since you tend to run your mouth about prospects more than basically anyone.
 
Yes, like usual. You often get these half baked thoughts and you cling onto them. As you're doing here by making those bullshit comments about us not thinking his numbers matter. Schaefer is very clearly the consensus #1 to anyone paying any attention.

The irony of your comment about non-scouts since you tend to run your mouth about prospects more than basically anyone.
Im not the one pretending a guy who hasn't played in 6 months is still clearly better than the most dominant play in the league. People saying Schaefer is clearly better and "every GM would agree" are making baseless claims. Again he hasn't played a game in 6 months, what is that opinion based on?

In your "professional opinion" what makes Schaefer so clearly the better prospect? And how do you know every GM agrees?
 
  • Like
Reactions: kevrondl
There's biased and then there's.... whatever this weird take is.
Interesting. People said the same thing when I was hyping up Tkachuk and Gaudreau. And Wolf. And Adam Fox. Check my post history.

Haven’t really made any bold proclamations for any other Flames prospects in main boards other than I thought Sam Bennet would be a really good player… that one didn’t look so good for a while. We’ll see how this one goes.
 
Im not the one pretending a guy who hasn't played in 6 months is still clearly better than the most dominant play in the league. People saying Schaefer is clearly better and "every GM would agree" are making baseless claims. Again he hasn't played a game in 6 months, what is that opinion based on?

In your "professional opinion" what makes Schaefer so clearly the better prospect? And how do you know every GM agrees?
again, you're making claims that no one actually f***ing said, talk about baseless claims. you're such a f***ing hypocrite

and the fact you think "better" is the deciding factor is all I need to dismiss your opion, it's about where they project them... but hey everyone who has sources is saying Schaefer is going #1... but hey your opinion means so much more that people with actual sources
 
again, you're making claims that no one actually f***ing said, talk about baseless claims. you're such a f***ing hypocrite

and the fact you think "better" is the deciding factor is all I need to dismiss your opion, it's about where they project them... but hey everyone who has sources is saying Schaefer is going #1... but hey your opinion means so much more that people with actual sources
Lmao what are you talking about. The person I responded to said, and I quote
if you ask 32 NHL teams probably 30 will tell you Schaefer is a better prospect
That is the subject of the conversation. You decided to chime in and argue with me about things I didn't say.

That user said Schaefer is absolutely considered the better prospect by 30/32 GM's, and I call bullshit. I think it is absolutely up for debate which one is better.

I am not arguing whether NYI prefers Misa vs Schaefer, or if sources say they do
 
Lmao what are you talking about. The person I responded to said, and I quote

That is the subject of the conversation. You decided to chime in and argue with me about things I didn't say.

That user said Schaefer is absolutely considered the better prospect by 30/32 GM's, and I call bullshit. I think it is absolutely up for debate which one is better.

I am not arguing whether NYI prefers Misa vs Schaefer, or if sources say they do
Oh I see, you think 30/32 is "every GM".... but hey maths is hard huh.
 
It's the same problem every time. No team in a position to draft in the top tier is in a position to realistically value current NHL talent more than a top prospect. The Isles are no different.

Such teams might consider moving down a few slots in exchange for a sweetener, but not out of the top tier of the first round entirely. The Isles might trade with Chicago or San Jose or Utah, but not down to the middle or late first round. I tend to think they keep the pick and draft Schaefer. They aren't so flush with quality young D under team control that they can pass that up.
 
again, you're making claims that no one actually f***ing said, talk about baseless claims. you're such a f***ing hypocrite

and the fact you think "better" is the deciding factor is all I need to dismiss your opion, it's about where they project them... but hey everyone who has sources is saying Schaefer is going #1... but hey your opinion means so much more that people with actual sources
Take it easy man, no need to curse at him lol holy shit
 
And there's no way those two are getting traded. Wolf is a Calder candidate and Parekh is a top 5 league wide prospect. That's likely the ceiling for the #1 overall pick this year. There's no true guaranteed franchise center.
This retort perfectly demonstrates why the proposed pieces don't land you 1st OA.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad